-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Editor: Make revisions more prominent #62323
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -28,3 +28,7 @@ | |
padding: $grid-unit-20; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
.editor-private-post-last-revision__button { | ||
display: inline-block; | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm looking at some other panel refactorings; they didn't keep the original versions. Example: #61357.
Should we do the same here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it's the same case because here we're not changing the entire panel (
PostLastRevisionPanel
) that is exported. So consumers of the above panel, should have the 'old'PostLastRevision
component.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the policy is to keep the old components intact, then we might need to revisit some of the refactoring, like #61357. Because
PostDiscussionPanel
has a new structure.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think there is a clear policy about that, but I think the changes should not be disruptive in the sense that they would make sense in other designs too. An example would be if we change a control and the exporting component is just that. In this case IMO it's fine to not keep the old version. In this PR for me it made more sense to keep the old one as it matches better when used inside
PostLastRevisionPanel
with the panel body and we actually don't usePostLastRevisionPanel
anymore in our codebase.Can you share the components you're concerned with the discussions panel? Also cc @jorgefilipecosta for visibility.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My concern is that the discussion panel consumers expect it to render
PanelBody > PanelRow
. Now, they'll get a different design.I personally don't mind either path for changes as long as they're consistent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know they get a different design and might be a bit different, but in my mind they still get the whole functionality (the whole panel). If I had to update the panel here for revisions personally I'd follow the same approach with the discussions panel. This is subjective though..