Patterns: Pass 'blocks' as inner blocks value #65029
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Mamaduka
added
[Type] Bug
|
The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the Unlinked AccountsThe following contributors have not linked their GitHub and WordPress.org accounts: @rdoughbs. Contributors, please read how to link your accounts to ensure your work is properly credited in WordPress releases. If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message. To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook. |
|
Size Change: -9 B (0%) Total Size: 1.78 MB
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
|
Flaky tests detected in f802f2d. 🔍 Workflow run URL: https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/actions/runs/10695530248
|
|
@talldan, @SantosGuillamot, all e2e tests are green. How's the test coverage of pattern overrides? I think some manual testing also won't hurt in this case. |
Mamaduka
requested review from
talldan,
ellatrix and
SantosGuillamot
and removed request for
ajitbohra
Mamaduka
force-pushed
the
try/fix-reusable-blocks-remounting
branch
from
f802f2d to
e843d6d
Compare
Pretty good, mostly thanks to @kevin940726's efforts. I'll give this a manual test too. |
|
Thank you, @talldan!
Could you share the testing steps afterward? I would like to include them in the PR description for future reference. |
|
I've done a bit of manual testing, and everything seems to be working as expected. But I'll leave it to @talldan for a final approval. Some things I tested: This issue is solved
Pattern overrides keep working as expected
Blocks with the same name are synced
Undo/Redo still work after clicking reset
|
|
Thanks, it's also working well for me. I carried out similar steps to @SantosGuillamot who was very thorough! A few other tests I did:
There's one issue I'm seeing with a double block icon when an overridden block is selected, but it's not from this PR (I'll spin up a separate PR for it). |
talldan
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2024
Mamaduka
changed the title
|
Thank you both for testing! I've updated the PR description to include details for future reference; feel free to edit it if I missed something. |
2 tasks
Mamaduka
added
the
Backport to WP Minor Release
|
@rdoughbs mind sharing your WordPress.org username so I can ensure its included in the 6.7 credits listing? |
cbravobernal
removed
the
Backport to WP Minor Release
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What?
Fixes #63909.
Fixes #64514.
PR updates Pattern (Reusable) block to use value for inner blocks provided by the
useEntityBlockEditorhook. It prevents infinite loops when a child blocks updates attributes inside effects on the mount.Why?
The attribute update will result in a new
innerBlocksvalue from the store, triggering an internal block synchronization. This synchronization, in turn, re-mounts child blocks, starting the whole cycle again.The "fresh" client IDs from inner blocks are only need to set block editing mode. See #60721 (comment).
Testing Instructions
See #65029 (comment)
Testing Instructions for Keyboard
Same.