Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update on s1 width cut #131

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2018
Merged

Update on s1 width cut #131

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2018

Conversation

skazama
Copy link
Contributor

@skazama skazama commented Jan 10, 2018

After discussion on Monday, s1 width cut is re-designed to 99% quantile line. Cut line and acceptance for all the calibration data can be seen in this
note

After discussion on Monday, s1 width cut is re-designed to 99% quantile line.
@skazama skazama requested review from pdeperio and coderdj January 10, 2018 15:04
@coderdj
Copy link
Contributor

coderdj commented Jan 10, 2018

Wait, you're too fast. Why not a flat line at 300? Or 250? What are the events in the little 'bump' at low E and why do we want to keep them?

@skazama
Copy link
Contributor Author

skazama commented Jan 10, 2018

I think this bump is from after-pulses and looks good events, thus if we have a flat line cut, acceptance may have energy dependence. that's why I calculated 99% quantile line.

For high energy events, afterpulse contribution is very small for 90% area width calculation, but not negligible in this energy region.

@coderdj
Copy link
Contributor

coderdj commented Jan 10, 2018

I can buy that. OK to merge from my side.

@skazama
Copy link
Contributor Author

skazama commented Jan 10, 2018

screen shot 2018-01-10 at 17 43 00

This is an example of waveform for those events in ER-band. You can clearly see afterpulse

@pdeperio pdeperio merged commit 460db9a into master Jan 11, 2018
@pdeperio pdeperio deleted the skazama-new-s1-width branch January 11, 2018 15:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants