[TRIVIAL] Remove all uses of the name scoped_lock #3309
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
scoped_lock is now a std name with subtly different semantics
compared to lock_guard. Namely it can be used to lock 0 or
more mutexes. This is valuable, but can also be accidentally
used to lock 0 mutexes when 1 was intended, creating a
run-time error.
Therefore, if and when we use scoped_lock, extra care needs to
be taken in reviewing that code to ensure it doesn't
accidentally lock 0 mutexes when 1 was intended. To aid in
such careful reviewing, the use of the name scoped_lock should
be limited to those cases where the number of mutexes is not
exactly one.
More in-depth rationale is here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/60172828/576911