CS: consistent placement of operators #133
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Boolean operator should be placed at the start of the line in multi-line conditions This generally makes for a smaller diff if something changes and improves readability.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context
Summary
This PR can be summarized in the following changelog entry:
Relevant technical choices:
CS: consistent placement of boolean operators
Boolean operator should be placed at the start of the line in multi-line conditions
This generally makes for a smaller diff if something changes and improves readability.
CS: concatenation operator at the start of the line
Same thing, but then for multi-line concatenation.
Test instructions
This PR can be tested by following these steps:
This is a code-only change and should have no effect on the functionality. If the build passes (linting, test runs), we're good.