Skip to content

Would this work better for coverage testing? #16

Would this work better for coverage testing?

Would this work better for coverage testing? #16

# Workflow derived from https://github.com/r-lib/actions/tree/v2/examples
# Need help debugging build failures? Start at https://github.com/r-lib/actions#where-to-find-help
on:
push:
branches: [master, devel]
pull_request:
branches: [master, devel]
name: test-coverage
jobs:
test-coverage:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
env:
GITHUB_PAT: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: r-lib/actions/setup-r@v2
with:
use-public-rspm: true
- uses: r-lib/actions/setup-r-dependencies@v2
with:
extra-packages: any::covr
needs: coverage
- name: Test coverage
run: |
covr::codecov(
quiet = FALSE,
clean = FALSE,
install_path = file.path(normalizePath(Sys.getenv("RUNNER_TEMP"), winslash = "/"), "package")
)
shell: Rscript {0}
- name: Show testthat output
if: always()
run: |
## --------------------------------------------------------------------
find '${{ runner.temp }}/package' -name 'testthat.Rout*' -exec cat '{}' \; || true
shell: bash
- name: Upload coverage reports to Codecov
uses: codecov/codecov-action@v4.0.1
with:
token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}