Minor LiveObjects fixes/refactoring #1898
Conversation
github-actions
bot
temporarily deployed
to
staging/pull/1898/typedoc
github-actions
bot
temporarily deployed
to
staging/pull/1898/features
github-actions
bot
temporarily deployed
to
staging/pull/1898/bundle-report
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across four files related to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/plugins/liveobjects/liveobjectspool.ts (1)
30-30: Approve the simplification with a suggestion for optimizationThe change simplifies the logic and improves readability by using the
filtermethod directly. This is a good improvement for maintainability.For potential optimization when dealing with large arrays, consider using a Set for faster lookups:
deleteExtraObjectIds(objectIds: string[]): void { const objectIdSet = new Set(objectIds); const poolObjectIds = [...this._pool.keys()]; const extraObjectIds = poolObjectIds.filter((x) => !objectIdSet.has(x)); extraObjectIds.forEach((x) => this._pool.delete(x)); }This approach would change the time complexity from O(n*m) to O(n+m), which could be beneficial for very large arrays. However, for small to medium-sized arrays, the current implementation is likely sufficient.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/plugins/liveobjects/liveobjectspool.ts (1 hunks)
- src/plugins/liveobjects/statemessage.ts (1 hunks)
- src/plugins/liveobjects/syncliveobjectsdatapool.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/plugins/liveobjects/syncliveobjectsdatapool.ts (3)
50-50: Improved efficiency inisEmptymethod.The change to directly access
this._pool.sizeinstead of calling a method is a good optimization. It simplifies the code and potentially improves performance by avoiding an unnecessary method call.
Line range hint
1-138: Overall assessment: Positive optimizationsThe changes made to the
SyncLiveObjectsDataPoolclass, specifically in theisEmptyandresetmethods, are positive optimizations that improve performance without altering the class's functionality. These modifications align with TypeScript best practices for working with Map objects and should result in more efficient code execution.
54-54: Optimizedresetmethod for better performance.The change to use
this._pool.clear()instead of creating a new Map is a good optimization. It's more memory-efficient and maintains existing references to the Map object.To ensure this change doesn't have unintended consequences, please verify that no other part of the codebase relies on getting a new Map instance when
resetis called. You can use the following script to check for potential issues:src/plugins/liveobjects/statemessage.ts (3)
158-158: LGTM: Asynchronous decoding of map entriesThe addition of
awaitfordecodeMapEntryensures proper asynchronous handling of each map entry decoding operation. This change aligns well with the updatedasyncmethod signature and improves the overall robustness of the decoding process.
164-164: LGTM: Consistent asynchronous decodingThe addition of
awaitfordecodeMapEntryin this loop maintains consistency with the previous change. This ensures that all map entries, whether inmessage.objectormessage.operation, are decoded asynchronously, improving the overall reliability of the decoding process.
Line range hint
151-177: Verify callers of thedecodemethodThe
decodemethod has been successfully updated to handle asynchronous operations for decoding map entries. This change improves the robustness of the decoding process. However, it's important to ensure that all callers of this method are updated to handle its new asynchronous nature.Please run the following script to identify potential callers that might need updating:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful
All callers of the
decodemethod are correctly handling its asynchronous behavior.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find potential callers of StateMessage.decode that might need updating # Search for StateMessage.decode calls echo "Potential callers of StateMessage.decode:" rg "StateMessage\.decode\(" --type ts # Search for potential async function calls that might not be awaited echo "\nPotential async calls that might need to be awaited:" rg "await.*StateMessage\.decode\(" --type tsLength of output: 592
…> !otherArr.includes(x))` instead
Some minor fixes/changes suggested by @coderabbitai in #1887. Opening a separate PR to not drag merging that one for longer
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
isEmptyandresetmethods in the SyncLiveObjectsDataPool for better performance.arrSubtractutility function to streamline codebase.