-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 674
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MF-1455 - Update Versions of Protobuf #1704
Conversation
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Codecov Report
📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more @@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1704 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 70.30% 70.32% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 148 148
Lines 11501 11501
==========================================
+ Hits 8086 8088 +2
+ Misses 2747 2745 -2
Partials 668 668
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
@@ -92,21 +92,24 @@ func TestTransformCBOR(t *testing.T) { | |||
require.Nil(t, err, "Decoding CBOR expected to succeed") | |||
|
|||
tr := senml.New(senml.CBOR) | |||
msg := messaging.Message{ | |||
|
|||
// 82AD2169626173652D6E616D6522F956402369626173652D756E6974200A24F9490025F9564000646E616D650164756E697406F95CB0036331323307F958B002F9514005F94900AA2169626173652D6E616D6522F956402369626173652D756E6974200A24F9490025F9564000646E616D6506F95CB007F958B005F94900 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is this? Some dead code? Or a regular comment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was initially there
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <blackd0t@protonmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
* initial commit * add protoc-gen-gofast * update generated files * fix linting * fix consumers error on message conversion * fix copying values on transformers * initial commit * initial commit * add protoc-gen-gofast * update generated files * fix linting * fix consumers error on message conversion * fix copying values on transformers * embedded for forward compatible. * remove gogo * embedded for forward compatible. * update protoc compiler * fix linting * remove hex comment Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo <socials@rodneyosodo.com>
Signed-off-by: rodneyosodo socials@rodneyosodo.com
What does this do?
Updates versions of protobuf
Which issue(s) does this PR fix/relate to?
Resolves #1455
List any changes that modify/break current functionality
When updating the protobuf version, it is possible that some changes may break backward compatibility. The change in the protobuf version enforces that the message is passed in as a pointer since it contains a sync mutex. Therefore, any existing code that attempted to pass the message without a pointer would no longer function correctly.
Have you included tests for your changes?
No
Did you document any new/modified functionality?
No
Notes
N/A