Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NOISSUE - Activate Standalone Mode For Things #1785

Closed

Conversation

rodneyosodo
Copy link
Member

What does this do?

Activates standalone mode for things by setting the environment variables

Which issue(s) does this PR fix/relate to?

Noissue

List any changes that modify/break current functionality

Activates things to run in standalone fashion

Have you included tests for your changes?

No

Did you document any new/modified functionality?

No

Notes

Partially Linked to #1784

@rodneyosodo rodneyosodo requested a review from a team as a code owner May 4, 2023 14:13
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1785 (ef2b2fb) into master (7cc1dd9) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1785   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   70.00%   70.00%           
=======================================
  Files         149      149           
  Lines       11803    11803           
=======================================
  Hits         8263     8263           
  Misses       2870     2870           
  Partials      670      670           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Copy link
Contributor

@arvindh123 arvindh123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@arvindh123 arvindh123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@drasko drasko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@drasko drasko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rodneyosodo
Copy link
Member Author

rodneyosodo commented Jun 15, 2023

Closing this as it is already implemented on master by #1716.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants