Fix _irq_handler #791
Merged
Fix _irq_handler #791
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I'm working on a project that has 3 rotary encoders. When I used this libary, I couldn't get the 3 switches to properly increment / decrement the steps when I called readAbs(). Looking back at the code, I see there was a change in 351cd82 which seemed to have caused the issue. If I look previous to 351cd82, the _irq_handler was using digitalRead. I think switching to bitRead caused a mix up between the physical pin number vs. the port pin? I'm not entirely sure. I reimplemented the pre 351cd82 code and used the new ada_callback. Seems to be working great now!
hathach
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm working on a project that has 3 rotary encoders. When I used this libary, I couldn't get the 3 switches to properly increment / decrement the steps when I called readAbs(). Looking back at the code, I see there was a change in 351cd82 which seemed to have caused the issue.
If I look previous to 351cd82, the _irq_handler was using digitalRead. I think switching to bitRead caused a mix up between the physical pin number vs. the port pin? I'm not entirely sure. I reimplemented the pre 351cd82 code and used the new ada_callback. Seems to be working great now!