Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make use of mvn for OpenJCEPlus test execution #5479

Conversation

jasonkatonica
Copy link
Contributor

@jasonkatonica jasonkatonica commented Aug 1, 2024

This update allows for the test infrastructure to make use of mvn directly for testing OpenJCEPlus. This allows for mvn to control dependency usage along with using the same test infrastructure and plugins in use within the open source project.

Signed-off-by: Jason Katonica katonica@us.ibm.com

@jasonkatonica
Copy link
Contributor Author

This update is dependent upon adoptium/TKG#591

@llxia
Copy link
Contributor

llxia commented Aug 22, 2024

Did we test this on Windows? If so, could you provide the Grinder link? Thanks

@jasonkatonica jasonkatonica marked this pull request as ready for review August 23, 2024 11:09
@jasonkatonica jasonkatonica marked this pull request as draft August 23, 2024 12:03
This update allows for the test infrastructure to make use of `mvn`
directly for testing `OpenJCEPlus`. This allows for `mvn` to control
dependency usage along with using the same test infrastructure and
plugins in use within the open source project.

Signed-off-by: Jason Katonica <katonica@us.ibm.com>
@jasonkatonica jasonkatonica force-pushed the katonica/feature/junit5executionopenjceplus branch from eee565a to 929b0e4 Compare August 23, 2024 15:36
@jasonkatonica
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @llxia I did need to make an update using 929b0e4 to get this to work on windows. The code now uses fully qualified paths to mvn and to the pom.xml file in order to work. Setting the path to mvn on windows had some issues. I ran this on the various platforms using the following grinder jobs with this new code:

@jasonkatonica jasonkatonica marked this pull request as ready for review August 23, 2024 16:40
Copy link
Contributor

@llxia llxia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@llxia llxia requested a review from LongyuZhang August 23, 2024 18:00
Copy link
Contributor

@LongyuZhang LongyuZhang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Will merge since the dependency PR has been merged.

@LongyuZhang LongyuZhang merged commit 3ccb51c into adoptium:master Aug 23, 2024
3 checks passed
jasonkatonica added a commit to jasonkatonica/aqa-tests that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2024
* Make use of mvn for OpenJCEPlus test execution

This update allows for the test infrastructure to make use of `mvn`
directly for testing `OpenJCEPlus`. This allows for `mvn` to control
dependency usage along with using the same test infrastructure and
plugins in use within the open source project.

Signed-off-by: Jason Katonica <katonica@us.ibm.com>

* Use fully qualified names instead of PATH

---------

Signed-off-by: Jason Katonica <katonica@us.ibm.com>
jasonkatonica added a commit to jasonkatonica/aqa-tests that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2024
* Make use of mvn for OpenJCEPlus test execution

This update allows for the test infrastructure to make use of `mvn`
directly for testing `OpenJCEPlus`. This allows for `mvn` to control
dependency usage along with using the same test infrastructure and
plugins in use within the open source project.

Signed-off-by: Jason Katonica <katonica@us.ibm.com>

* Use fully qualified names instead of PATH

---------

Signed-off-by: Jason Katonica <katonica@us.ibm.com>
@jasonkatonica jasonkatonica deleted the katonica/feature/junit5executionopenjceplus branch August 23, 2024 19:36
jasonkatonica added a commit to jasonkatonica/aqa-tests that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2024
* Make use of mvn for OpenJCEPlus test execution

This update allows for the test infrastructure to make use of `mvn`
directly for testing `OpenJCEPlus`. This allows for `mvn` to control
dependency usage along with using the same test infrastructure and
plugins in use within the open source project.

Signed-off-by: Jason Katonica <katonica@us.ibm.com>

* Use fully qualified names instead of PATH

---------

Signed-off-by: Jason Katonica <katonica@us.ibm.com>
jasonkatonica added a commit to jasonkatonica/aqa-tests that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2024
* Make use of mvn for OpenJCEPlus test execution

This update allows for the test infrastructure to make use of `mvn`
directly for testing `OpenJCEPlus`. This allows for `mvn` to control
dependency usage along with using the same test infrastructure and
plugins in use within the open source project.

Signed-off-by: Jason Katonica <katonica@us.ibm.com>

* Use fully qualified names instead of PATH

---------

Signed-off-by: Jason Katonica <katonica@us.ibm.com>
llxia pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2024
* Make use of mvn for OpenJCEPlus test execution

This update allows for the test infrastructure to make use of `mvn`
directly for testing `OpenJCEPlus`. This allows for `mvn` to control
dependency usage along with using the same test infrastructure and
plugins in use within the open source project.



* Use fully qualified names instead of PATH

---------

Signed-off-by: Jason Katonica <katonica@us.ibm.com>
llxia pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2024
* Make use of mvn for OpenJCEPlus test execution

This update allows for the test infrastructure to make use of `mvn`
directly for testing `OpenJCEPlus`. This allows for `mvn` to control
dependency usage along with using the same test infrastructure and
plugins in use within the open source project.



* Use fully qualified names instead of PATH

---------

Signed-off-by: Jason Katonica <katonica@us.ibm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants