-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use Docker container for riscv64 #836
Conversation
Thank you for creating a pull request!Please check out the information below if you have not made a pull request here before (or if you need a reminder how things work). Code Quality and Contributing GuidelinesIf you have not done so already, please familiarise yourself with our Contributing Guidelines and Code Of Conduct, even if you have contributed before. TestsGithub actions will run a set of jobs against your PR that will lint and unit test your changes. Keep an eye out for the results from these on the latest commit you submitted. For more information, please see our testing documentation. In order to run the advanced pipeline tests (executing a set of mock pipelines), it requires an admin to post |
It depends on adoptium/infrastructure#3240 |
The boards are just too limited at the moment. It only targets jdk17u, jdk19u, and jdk20u for now for lack of Ubuntu 20.04 compatible builds of jdk20u (for jdk21u) and jdk21u (for jdk22). Once we've some builds of jdk20u on Ubuntu 20.04, we can enable jdk21u. Next we can do jdk21u for jdk22.
02b867a
to
9d54010
Compare
…o riscv64-docker-images
It is currently blocked by not being able to push the |
But as you say it isn't going to work yet until we can push it up. Why did you select x64 as the host specifically for this? |
Is there a way to manually push the image until the CI is fixed? Given RISC-V isn't an officially supported platform, the necessity for tracking sources of the tools isn't as much a requirement?
Kinda of by default. Happy to use something else if it's any better. The other ones I would see is aarch64 if we have enough machines in that pool (and fast enough) to dedicate to that. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we update the commit message on this - I know the option in the pipelines says "crossCompile" but since this is not using a cross-compiler (it's still running the native riscv64 compiler) I'd prefer it to say "Use system emulation" or something along those lines.
Scaling down the scope of this PR to only using the docker container. We'll see to use x64 host on a follow-up PR. |
Superseded by #864 |
No description provided.