UnixPB: Include Pre-Req Packages For SSL Test

[steelhead31]

Fixes #3059

Install packages required for running ssl-tests for 3rd party clients ( gnutls / nss / openssl ), also include appropriate documentation update, and an additional test has been added to the VPC tests.

Checklist

• commit message has one of the standard prefixes
• other documentation is changed or added (if applicable)
• playbook changes run through VPC or QPC (if you have access)

[steelhead31]

VPC run with SSL tests on Fed35.. https://ci.adoptium.net/job/VagrantPlaybookCheck/OS=Fedora35,label=vagrant/1703/console

VPC Assorted other platforms
https://ci.adoptium.net/job/VagrantPlaybookCheck/1704/

[sxa]

Two things (OK it's three!)

1. I presume this doesn't modify any existing openssl install or links etc that might affect anything building against it (e.g. openh9)
2. Are we happy that this will be ok on CentOS6?
3. This will presumably need to be added to the Dockerfiles in the DockerStatic role since those are used for most of our test machines

[sxa]

Requesting changes as this will need to be in the docker files

[github-actions]

A block has been put on this Pull Request as this repository is temporarily under a code freeze due to an ongoing release cycle.

If this pull request needs to be merged during the release cycle then please comment /merge and a PMC member will be able to remove the block.

If the code freeze is over you can remove this block by commenting /thaw.

[sxa]

/thaw

Pull Request unblocked - code freeze is over.

[sxa]

Is there a reason why the Alpine dockerfiles have had the new packages added to the existing apk line but for the other distributions they use a separate apt/yum command? Would be nice to be consistent across the distributions for maintenance purposes.

[steelhead31]

Ubuntu 21.04 check failure due to "hirsute" repos being removed.

[steelhead31]

Is there a reason why the Alpine dockerfiles have had the new packages added to the existing apk line but for the other distributions they use a separate apt/yum command? Would be nice to be consistent across the distributions for maintenance purposes.

Nope, I'll align them, I think I had the idea to seperate them for clarities sake, probably after I'd done the alpine ones, they should be aligned now.

[steelhead31]

@sxa I've also run the openj9 crypto tests ( in fact the whole java_security suite ) with a build of openj9 (jdk17), and thats all worked fine in both and Ubuntu/x64 vagrant & VM environments.

[sxa]

Thanks :-)