Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stop showing full SBoM output in build log #3567

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2023

Conversation

sxa
Copy link
Member

@sxa sxa commented Dec 8, 2023

Discussions starter: I personally find that the display of the SBoM content is overly verbose, and it typically makes it harder to find what I want in the log because I have to start at the bottom and scroll back to the "good bits". This PR suggests changing it so that it prints the location on the file system instead of printing it out. While this may be useful for debug/development I don't think it should print it by default. Bear in mind this content will also be archived afterwards along with the build itself.
In addition we print the metadata out in the pipelines job at https://github.com/adoptium/ci-jenkins-pipelines/blob/833a06de53ae21ffec043863600a88a5dbbb6529/pipelines/build/common/openjdk_build_pipeline.groovy#L1275 which should probably be removed too, but I'm looking for feedback before creating a second PR for that.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the jenkins Issues that enhance or fix our jenkins server label Dec 8, 2023
Signed-off-by: Stewart X Addison <sxa@redhat.com>
@sxa sxa force-pushed the stop_printing_sbom branch from 2637d75 to feca1be Compare December 8, 2023 10:54
@github-actions github-actions bot added jenkins Issues that enhance or fix our jenkins server and removed jenkins Issues that enhance or fix our jenkins server labels Dec 8, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@karianna karianna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but checks are failing - hopefully for unrelated reasons.

@sxa
Copy link
Member Author

sxa commented Dec 11, 2023

LGTM but checks are failing - hopefully for unrelated reasons.

Yeah this is the TKG issue that's been affecting multiple PRs (Raised in Slack and I'll get an issue raised today if no-one picks it up) . I'm not really sure why we're running TKG stuff as part of the build tests (I've queried that in this slack thread)

Copy link
Contributor

@andrew-m-leonard andrew-m-leonard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm
That echo was a leftover from the initial work

@sxa
Copy link
Member Author

sxa commented Dec 19, 2023

lgtm That echo was a leftover from the initial work

Ah good to know - not so controversial after all then ;-)

@sxa
Copy link
Member Author

sxa commented Dec 20, 2023

Re-running build checks now that adoptium/aqa-tests#4914 has been resolved.

@sxa
Copy link
Member Author

sxa commented Dec 20, 2023

Checks are still failing, but they're failing on other PRs such as #3590 so I'm merging anyway.

@sxa sxa merged commit 93da3a3 into adoptium:master Dec 20, 2023
19 of 23 checks passed
@karianna karianna mentioned this pull request Jan 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jenkins Issues that enhance or fix our jenkins server
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants