Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move constitution.jax.isochoric_volumetric_split() #887

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

adtzlr
Copy link
Owner

@adtzlr adtzlr commented Nov 5, 2024

from constitution.jax.models.hyperelastic.isochoric_volumetric_split().

Also for tensortrax from constitution.tensortrax.models.hyperelastic.isochoric_volumetric_split() to constitution.tensortrax.isochoric_volumetric_split()

from `constitution.jax.models.hyperelastic.isochoric_volumetric_split()`; also for tensortrax
@adtzlr adtzlr added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 5, 2024
@adtzlr adtzlr self-assigned this Nov 5, 2024
@adtzlr adtzlr added the consistency All tasks towards consistent namings for similar tasks label Nov 5, 2024
@adtzlr adtzlr merged commit b213099 into main Nov 5, 2024
3 checks passed
@adtzlr adtzlr deleted the move-iso-vol-split branch November 5, 2024 22:23
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.67%. Comparing base (461eadc) to head (a42af9e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #887      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.67%   97.67%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         167      166       -1     
  Lines        6065     6063       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         5924     5922       -2     
  Misses        141      141              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
consistency All tasks towards consistent namings for similar tasks enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant