Added external-secrets-operator #370
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 25
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (71)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/.helmignore (1)
1-3: LGTM! Consider adding more common ignore patterns.The current entries in the .helmignore file are appropriate and will help streamline the Helm chart by excluding unnecessary files and directories.
Consider adding more common ignore patterns to make the .helmignore file more comprehensive. Here's a suggested expansion:
images hack .gitkeep +# Common VCS directories +.git/ +.gitignore +.bzr/ +.bzrignore +.hg/ +.hgignore +.svn/ +# Common backup files +*.swp +*.bak +*.tmp +*.orig +*~ +# Various IDEs +.project +.idea/ +*.tmproj +.vscode/These additional patterns will help ensure that version control system files, backup files, and IDE-specific files are also excluded from the Helm chart package.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/values.yaml (1)
3-3: Remove trailing spaces for consistency.There are trailing spaces at the end of line 3. While this doesn't affect functionality, it's good practice to maintain consistent formatting.
Please remove the trailing spaces. You can apply this diff:
- enabled: false + enabled: false🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 3-3: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/extra-manifests.yaml (1)
1-1: Consider adding a comment to explain the purpose of this template section.To improve maintainability and make it easier for other developers to understand the purpose of this code, consider adding a comment at the beginning of the file. This comment should explain that this template is used for rendering additional Kubernetes objects specified in the chart's values.
Here's a suggested comment you could add:
{{- /* This template renders additional Kubernetes objects specified in .Values.extraObjects. It allows for dynamic inclusion of custom resources or other objects needed for the external-secrets-operator. */ -}}🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/Makefile (1)
6-11: LGTM: Well-structured update target with room for improvement.The
updatetarget effectively fetches and prepares the latest version of the external-secrets chart. The operations are clearly defined and follow a logical sequence.Consider the following suggestions for improvement:
- Add error handling to ensure each step completes successfully before proceeding to the next.
- Consider adding a version parameter to allow fetching specific versions of the chart.
- Add a comment explaining why sub-charts are removed in the last step.
Here's an example of how you could implement error handling and versioning:
CHART_VERSION ?= latest update: rm -rf charts helm repo add external-secrets https://charts.external-secrets.io || exit 1 helm repo update external-secrets || exit 1 if [ "$(CHART_VERSION)" = "latest" ]; then \ helm pull external-secrets/external-secrets --untar --untardir charts || exit 1; \ else \ helm pull external-secrets/external-secrets --version $(CHART_VERSION) --untar --untardir charts || exit 1; \ fi # Remove sub-charts to avoid conflicts with our custom setup rm -rf charts/external-secrets/chartsThis implementation adds basic error handling with
|| exit 1and introduces aCHART_VERSIONvariable that defaults to "latest" but can be overridden to fetch specific versions.packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/NOTES.txt (2)
3-5: Consider a minor wording improvement.The instructions are clear and helpful. However, we can make a small adjustment to improve conciseness.
Consider this minor change:
-In order to begin using ExternalSecrets, you will need to set up a SecretStore +To begin using ExternalSecrets, set up a SecretStoreThis change maintains the meaning while making the sentence more concise.
6-7: LGTM: Good reference to documentation. Consider adding version info.The reference to GitHub for more information is helpful, and using a template for the URL is a good practice.
Consider adding the chart version to provide context:
More information on the different types of SecretStores and how to configure them -can be found in our Github: {{ .Chart.Home }} +can be found in our Github: {{ .Chart.Home }} +Chart Version: {{ .Chart.Version }}This addition would help users know which version of the documentation they should refer to.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-secret.yaml (1)
1-14: LGTM! Well-structured template with proper conditional rendering.The template is well-organized and follows Kubernetes best practices. The conditional rendering ensures the Secret is only created when necessary, and the use of templates for name and namespace promotes consistency.
However, there are a few minor improvements we can make:
- The yamllint tool reports a syntax error. This is likely due to the conditional statement at the beginning of the file. To fix this, we can add a small comment before the conditional:
# Create webhook secret if needed {{- if and .Values.webhook.create (not .Values.webhook.certManager.enabled) }}
- The Secret resource is missing a
dataorstringDatasection. While this might be intentional if the actual secret data is populated later, it's generally good practice to include at least an empty data section for clarity:data: {}
- Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this Secret, for example:
# Secret for external-secrets webhook {{- if and .Values.webhook.create (not .Values.webhook.certManager.enabled) }}Would you like me to implement these suggestions?
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/Chart.yaml (2)
10-13: Consider adding more specific keywords.The icon URL and current keywords are appropriate. To improve discoverability, consider adding more specific keywords related to the supported secret management services.
You could add keywords like:
- vault
- aws-secrets-manager
- azure-key-vault
- gcp-secret-manager
15-17: Consider using a project-specific email for the maintainer.While it's great to have maintainer information, using a personal email address might not be ideal for long-term project maintenance. Consider using a project-specific or organization email address instead.
You could update the maintainer email to a project-specific address, for example:
maintainers: - email: maintainers@external-secrets.io name: mcavoykpackages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-serviceaccount.yaml (2)
2-8: LGTM: Well-defined ServiceAccount with a minor indentation issue.The ServiceAccount resource is correctly defined with appropriate use of template functions for name, namespace, and labels. This approach provides flexibility and consistency in resource naming and labeling.
However, there's a minor indentation issue that should be addressed:
Please adjust the indentation of the YAML file to use 2 spaces consistently. This will improve readability and adhere to YAML best practices. For example:
apiVersion: v1 kind: ServiceAccount metadata: name: {{ include "external-secrets-cert-controller.serviceAccountName" . }} namespace: {{ template "external-secrets.namespace" . }} labels: {{- include "external-secrets-cert-controller.labels" . | nindent 2 }}
9-15: LGTM: Flexible metadata configuration with indentation issues.The approach for adding extra labels and annotations is well-implemented, allowing for customization through Helm values. This flexibility is valuable for adapting the ServiceAccount to different environments or requirements.
However, the indentation issues persist in these sections:
Please adjust the indentation to use 2 spaces consistently throughout the file. Here's the corrected version:
{{- with .Values.certController.serviceAccount.extraLabels }} {{- toYaml . | nindent 2 }} {{- end }} {{- with .Values.certController.serviceAccount.annotations }} annotations: {{- toYaml . | nindent 2 }} {{- end }}This change will improve readability and adhere to YAML best practices.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 11-11: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/poddisruptionbudget.yaml (1)
1-3: LGTM with a minor suggestion for improved readability.The conditional creation and API version are correctly specified. However, for improved readability, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this PDB.
Consider adding a comment at the beginning of the file:
{{- if .Values.podDisruptionBudget.enabled }} # PodDisruptionBudget to ensure high availability of external-secrets-operator apiVersion: policy/v1 kind: PodDisruptionBudget🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-poddisruptionbudget.yaml (2)
4-9: LGTM: Well-structured metadata with a minor suggestionThe metadata section is well-structured, using appropriate template functions for name and namespace, which ensures consistency across resources. The labels are correctly applied, including a specific label for the webhook component.
Consider adding a
app.kubernetes.io/namelabel to align with Kubernetes recommended labels:labels: {{- include "external-secrets-webhook.labels" . | nindent 4 }} external-secrets.io/component: webhook app.kubernetes.io/name: {{ include "external-secrets.name" . }}-webhook
10-16: LGTM: Flexible spec configuration with a suggestion for validationThe spec section allows for flexible configuration of either
minAvailableormaxUnavailable, which is good practice for PodDisruptionBudgets.Consider adding a validation check to ensure only one of
minAvailableormaxUnavailableis set. You could use a Helm named template for this validation:{{- define "validatePDB" -}} {{- if and .Values.webhook.podDisruptionBudget.minAvailable .Values.webhook.podDisruptionBudget.maxUnavailable -}} {{- fail "Only one of minAvailable or maxUnavailable should be set for PodDisruptionBudget" -}} {{- end -}} {{- end -}} # Use the validation in your template {{- include "validatePDB" . }} spec: {{- if .Values.webhook.podDisruptionBudget.minAvailable }} minAvailable: {{ .Values.webhook.podDisruptionBudget.minAvailable }} {{- end }} {{- if .Values.webhook.podDisruptionBudget.maxUnavailable }} maxUnavailable: {{ .Values.webhook.podDisruptionBudget.maxUnavailable }} {{- end }}This will cause the Helm installation to fail if both values are set, preventing potential issues.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 12-12: wrong indentation: expected 0 but found 2
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/service.yaml (1)
1-8: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The conditional creation and resource definition look good. The use of templates for name, namespace, and labels is a best practice.
Consider adding a comment at the beginning of the file to explain the purpose of this service:
{{- /* This service exposes metrics for the external-secrets-operator. It is conditionally created based on .Values.metrics.service.enabled. */ -}}🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-service.yaml (3)
1-1: Consider improving readability by splitting the condition.The condition for creating this service is complex and spans a long line. To enhance readability and maintainability, consider splitting it into multiple lines.
Here's a suggested format:
{{- if and .Values.certController.create .Values.certController.metrics.service.enabled (not .Values.webhook.certManager.enabled) }}This format makes each condition more visible and easier to understand at a glance.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
4-12: LGTM: Well-structured metadata with appropriate use of templating.The metadata section is well-organized and makes good use of Helm templating functions for name, namespace, and labels. This approach ensures consistency and flexibility.
Minor suggestion: Consider using
{{- with .Values.certController.metrics.service.annotations }}instead of.Values.metrics.service.annotationsto maintain consistency with the rest of the template's structure.
13-27: LGTM: Appropriate spec for a metrics service with flexible configuration.The service specification is well-structured and appropriate for a metrics service. The use of conditional settings for IP families provides good flexibility.
Consider using a variable for the
targetPortto make it more configurable:targetPort: {{ .Values.certController.metrics.port | default "metrics" }}This change would allow easy customization of the target port if needed in the future.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-service.yaml (1)
10-15: LGTM! Consider a minor readability improvement.The conditional addition of metrics annotations is well-implemented. The use of
toYamlallows for flexible configuration of annotations.For improved readability, consider using a multi-line block for the annotations section:
{{- if .Values.webhook.metrics.service.enabled }} annotations: {{- with .Values.webhook.metrics.service.annotations }} {{- toYaml . | nindent 4 }} {{- end }} {{- end }}packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-certificate.yaml (2)
6-14: LGTM: Well-structured metadata with dynamic valuesThe metadata section is well-organized, using Helm templates for dynamic value insertion. The inclusion of labels and optional annotations provides good flexibility for resource management.
Consider adding a common label like
app.kubernetes.io/name: {{ include "external-secrets.name" . }}for consistency with Kubernetes recommended labels.
23-30: LGTM: Flexible certificate lifecycle configurationThe inclusion of optional
durationandrenewBeforefields provides good flexibility for certificate lifecycle management. ThesecretNameis consistently set using the Helm template.Consider adding comments or documentation for the
durationandrenewBeforefields in the Helm values file, explaining their purpose and recommended settings. This will help users understand how to configure these optional fields effectively.packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-rbac.yaml (1)
1-86: Overall structure is correct, but there's a minor syntax consideration.The overall structure of this RBAC configuration file is well-organized and follows Kubernetes best practices. It correctly defines a ClusterRole and ClusterRoleBinding for the certificate controller.
Note: The static analysis tool reported a syntax error on line 1:
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'This is likely a false positive due to the conditional statement. However, to improve compatibility with some YAML parsers, consider adding a space after the opening
{{-like this:{{- if and .Values.certController.create .Values.certController.rbac.create (not .Values.webhook.certManager.enabled) -}}This minor change might resolve the syntax warning without affecting the functionality.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 12-12: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 14-14: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 20-20: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 22-22: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 24-24: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 28-28: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 30-30: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 32-32: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 35-35: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 38-38: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 40-40: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 42-42: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 46-46: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 48-48: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 50-50: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 53-53: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 55-55: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 57-57: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 63-63: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 65-65: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 67-67: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/uuid.yaml (3)
1-15: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for the cert-manager annotation.The CRD metadata is well-structured and follows best practices. The conditional installation and dynamic annotations based on Helm values provide flexibility.
Consider adding a comment above the cert-manager annotation to explain its purpose:
{{- if and .Values.crds.conversion.enabled .Values.webhook.certManager.enabled .Values.webhook.certManager.addInjectorAnnotations }} # Annotation for cert-manager to inject CA into the webhook cert-manager.io/inject-ca-from: {{ .Release.Namespace }}/{{ include "external-secrets.fullname" . }}-webhook {{- end }}🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
29-55: LGTM! Consider expanding the spec schema.The CRD version and schema are well-defined. The use of v1alpha1 correctly indicates an early version.
Consider expanding the
specschema to include any specific properties for the UUID generator. For example:spec: description: UUIDSpec controls the behavior of the uuid generator. type: object properties: version: type: integer enum: [1, 4] default: 1 description: The UUID version to generate (1 or 4)This would provide more clarity on the available options for the UUID generator.
60-72: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for the conversion webhook.The conversion webhook configuration is well-structured and uses Helm template functions effectively.
Consider adding a comment to explain the purpose of the conversion webhook:
{{- if .Values.crds.conversion.enabled }} # Configuration for the CRD conversion webhook conversion: strategy: Webhook webhook: # ... (rest of the configuration) {{- end }}This would improve readability and provide context for the conversion webhook's purpose.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/validatingwebhook.yaml (1)
2-46: LGTM: Well-structured secretstore validation webhookThe ValidatingWebhookConfiguration for secretstore and clustersecretstore resources is well-defined and follows Kubernetes best practices. It correctly handles both namespaced and cluster-scoped resources, and includes important settings such as admissionReviewVersions, sideEffects, and timeoutSeconds.
Consider adding a
failurePolicyfield to both webhook configurations, similar to the one in the externalsecret-validate webhook. This would provide consistent behavior across all webhooks and allow for fine-tuning of the admission control process.Example addition for both webhooks:
failurePolicy: {{ .Values.webhook.failurePolicy }}packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/fake.yaml (2)
4-15: LGTM: Well-structured metadata with dynamic annotations.The metadata is well-structured with appropriate use of annotations and labels. The conditional annotations provide flexibility, and the controller-gen version is clearly indicated.
Consider adding a brief description annotation to provide more context about the Fake generator's purpose. For example:
annotations: description: "CRD for Fake generator used in testing external-secrets"🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
29-74: LGTM: Comprehensive schema definition with clear descriptions.The OpenAPI v3 schema is well-defined and includes all necessary fields with clear descriptions. The
specsection appropriately includes acontrollerfield for ESO controller selection and a flexibledatafield for static data.Consider adding a
requiredfield to the schema to indicate which properties are mandatory. For example:required: - specThis would ensure that users always provide the necessary
specwhen creating a Fake resource.packages/core/platform/bundles/distro-full.yaml (1)
148-148: Add a newline at the end of the file.To follow best practices and ensure compatibility with various tools, please add a newline character at the end of the file.
Apply this change to add a newline at the end of the file:
namespace: cozy-external-secrets-operator dependsOn: [cilium] +🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 148-148: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/password.yaml (3)
1-28: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The CRD structure and metadata are well-defined and follow Kubernetes best practices. The use of Helm templating for conditional creation and dynamic values is appropriate.
Consider adding a brief comment at the beginning of the file to explain the purpose of this CRD, for example:
{{- if .Values.installCRDs }} # Custom Resource Definition for Password generation in external-secrets-operator apiVersion: apiextensions.k8s.io/v1 ...🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
29-37: LGTM! Consider future versioning strategy.The CRD version and schema structure are well-defined. The use of v1alpha1 is appropriate for a new CRD.
As this is an alpha version, consider planning for future versioning:
- Document the versioning strategy for this CRD.
- Prepare for potential breaking changes in future versions.
- Consider implementing a conversion webhook for seamless upgrades when moving to beta or stable versions in the future.
38-91: LGTM! Consider clarifying the 'symbols' property.The Password resource properties are well-defined with clear descriptions and appropriate default values where applicable.
For the 'symbols' property, consider adding a default value and clarifying its relationship with 'symbolCharacters'. For example:
symbols: description: |- Symbols specifies the number of symbol characters in the generated password. If omitted it defaults to 25% of the length of the password. These symbols will be chosen from the characters specified in 'symbolCharacters'. type: integer default: 6 # 25% of the default length (24)packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/githubaccesstoken.yaml (3)
1-15: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The CRD metadata and conditional installation look good. The use of template directives for dynamic annotation inclusion is a nice touch.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
.Values.installCRDscondition for better maintainability:{{- if .Values.installCRDs }} # Only install CRDs if explicitly enabled in values apiVersion: apiextensions.k8s.io/v1 ...🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
29-96: LGTM! Consider adding validation for the URL field.The schema definition for the GithubAccessToken resource is comprehensive and well-structured. The use of detailed descriptions for each field enhances the usability of the CRD.
Consider adding a pattern validation for the
urlfield to ensure it's a valid URL format:url: description: URL configures the Github instance URL. Defaults to https://github.com/. type: string pattern: '^https?://.*'This addition would help prevent potential issues with malformed URLs.
101-113: LGTM! Consider adding a comment about the conversion webhook.The conversion webhook configuration is well-structured and follows Kubernetes best practices. The conditional setup based on
.Values.crds.conversion.enabledprovides flexibility in deployment.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the conversion webhook for better maintainability:
{{- if .Values.crds.conversion.enabled }} # Configure conversion webhook for handling multiple versions of the CRD conversion: strategy: Webhook ... {{- end }}packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-deployment.yaml (3)
13-29: LGTM: Well-structured deployment spec with a suggestion.The deployment spec is well-configured:
- Configurable replicas for scalability.
- Managed revision history.
- Consistent use of templates for selectors and labels.
- Customizable pod annotations and labels.
Consider adding a minimum and maximum replica count using the Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) for better resource management and scalability. This can be achieved by adding an HPA resource in a separate file or as part of this deployment. Example:
apiVersion: autoscaling/v2beta1 kind: HorizontalPodAutoscaler metadata: name: {{ include "external-secrets.fullname" . }}-cert-controller-hpa spec: scaleTargetRef: apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment name: {{ include "external-secrets.fullname" . }}-cert-controller minReplicas: {{ .Values.certController.minReplicas | default 1 }} maxReplicas: {{ .Values.certController.maxReplicas | default 3 }} metrics: - type: Resource resource: name: cpu targetAverageUtilization: {{ .Values.certController.targetCPUUtilizationPercentage | default 80 }}
30-96: LGTM: Comprehensive container configuration with a security suggestion.The container configuration is well-structured and flexible:
- Templated image and pull policy for consistency.
- Extensive argument configuration for cert-controller.
- Properly configured readiness probe.
- Customizable resource configuration.
Consider adding a security context to the container for enhanced security. This can be done by adding the following under the
securityContextkey:securityContext: runAsNonRoot: true runAsUser: 1000 readOnlyRootFilesystem: true capabilities: drop: - ALLThis configuration:
- Ensures the container runs as a non-root user.
- Sets a specific user ID.
- Makes the root filesystem read-only.
- Drops all Linux capabilities, following the principle of least privilege.
Remember to test thoroughly after implementing these changes to ensure they don't interfere with the cert-controller's functionality.
121-124: LGTM: Proper implementation of priority class name with a suggestion.The priority class name section is correctly implemented:
- Conditionally set based on .Values.certController.priorityClassName.
- Allows for control over pod scheduling and preemption.
Consider adding a default priority class name in the values.yaml file to ensure the cert-controller always has a defined priority. This can be achieved by modifying the relevant section in values.yaml:
certController: priorityClassName: "high-priority"Then, update the deployment template to use this default value:
{{- if .Values.certController.priorityClassName }} priorityClassName: {{ .Values.certController.priorityClassName }} {{- end }}This ensures that even if not explicitly set, the cert-controller will have a default priority, which can be crucial for its proper functioning in a busy cluster.
packages/core/platform/bundles/paas-full.yaml (1)
224-224: Add a newline at the end of the file.To follow YAML best practices and improve file consistency, please add a newline at the end of the file.
Apply this change to add a newline at the end of the file:
namespace: cozy-external-secrets-operator dependsOn: [cilium,kubeovn] +🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 224-224: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/deployment.yaml (4)
13-18: LGTM: Well-defined deployment spec with room for improvementThe deployment spec is well-structured, using configurable values for replicas and including a revision history limit. The selector is correctly set to match the pod labels.
Consider adding a configurable option for the revision history limit, similar to how replicas are handled:
revisionHistoryLimit: {{ .Values.revisionHistoryLimit | default 10 }}This would allow users to customize the revision history limit if needed, while providing a default value.
30-111: LGTM: Comprehensive pod spec with security considerationsThe pod spec section is well-structured and covers essential aspects such as service account, security contexts, networking, and detailed container specifications. The use of conditional logic for security contexts and the inclusion of resource management are particularly noteworthy.
To enhance security, consider adding a
seccompProfileto the pod security context:{{- with .Values.podSecurityContext }} {{- if and (.enabled) (gt (keys . | len) 1) }} securityContext: {{- include "external-secrets.renderSecurityContext" (dict "securityContext" . "context" $) | nindent 8 }} seccompProfile: type: RuntimeDefault {{- end }} {{- end }}This addition would enable the default seccomp profile, which is a good practice for reducing the kernel attack surface.
54-96: LGTM: Flexible and comprehensive container argumentsThe container arguments section is well-implemented, providing fine-grained control over the operator's behavior through various conditional arguments. The inclusion of metrics, logging, and reconciler options is thorough, and the handling of extra arguments adds flexibility.
To improve readability and maintainability, consider grouping related arguments into separate blocks with comments. For example:
args: # Leader election {{- if .Values.leaderElect }} - --enable-leader-election=true {{- end }} # Namespace scoping {{- if .Values.scopedNamespace }} - --namespace={{ .Values.scopedNamespace }} {{- end }} # Reconciler options {{- if and .Values.scopedNamespace .Values.scopedRBAC }} - --enable-cluster-store-reconciler=false - --enable-cluster-external-secret-reconciler=false {{- else }} {{- if not .Values.processClusterStore }} - --enable-cluster-store-reconciler=false {{- end }} {{- if not .Values.processClusterExternalSecret }} - --enable-cluster-external-secret-reconciler=false {{- end }} {{- end }} # ... (continue grouping other arguments)This structure would make it easier to understand and maintain the different configuration options.
115-145: LGTM: Comprehensive advanced pod configurationsThe additional pod configurations section is well-implemented, covering important Kubernetes features such as DNS settings, node selection, affinity, tolerations, topology spread constraints, and priority class. The use of global values with local overrides is a good practice for maintaining consistency while allowing flexibility.
To improve consistency across all settings, consider applying the same pattern of global values with local overrides to the DNS policy and config. For example:
dnsPolicy: {{ .Values.dnsPolicy | default .Values.global.dnsPolicy | default "ClusterFirst" }} {{- if or .Values.dnsConfig .Values.global.dnsConfig }} dnsConfig: {{- toYaml (.Values.dnsConfig | default .Values.global.dnsConfig) | nindent 8 }} {{- end }}This change would allow for global DNS settings that can be overridden at the chart level, maintaining consistency with how other settings are handled.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/servicemonitor.yaml (3)
2-53: LGTM: Well-structured metrics Service and ServiceMonitorThe metrics Service and ServiceMonitor resources are well-defined and make good use of Helm templating for customization. The conditional inclusion of ipFamilyPolicy and ipFamilies is a nice touch for flexibility.
One minor suggestion for consistency:
Consider using the same indentation for the
toYamlfunction calls. For example, on line 15:ipFamilies: {{ .Values.service.ipFamilies | toYaml | nindent 2 }}You could change it to:
ipFamilies: {{- .Values.service.ipFamilies | toYaml | nindent 2 }}This would make it consistent with how you've formatted other similar sections (e.g., lines 47-49 and 51-53).
55-108: LGTM: Well-structured webhook metrics Service and ServiceMonitorThe webhook metrics Service and ServiceMonitor resources are well-defined and consistently structured. The conditional creation based on
.Values.webhook.createprovides good flexibility.One suggestion for improved clarity:
Consider adding a comment before the conditional block to explain the purpose of these resources. For example:
{{- if .Values.webhook.create }} # Create Service and ServiceMonitor for webhook metrics when webhook is enabledThis would make it easier for users to understand the purpose of this section at a glance.
110-164: LGTM: Well-structured cert-controller metrics Service and ServiceMonitorThe cert-controller metrics Service and ServiceMonitor resources are well-defined and consistently structured. The conditional creation based on
.Values.certController.createprovides good flexibility.Two minor suggestions for consistency and clarity:
Consider adding a comment before the conditional block to explain the purpose of these resources, similar to the suggestion for the webhook section.
For consistency with the other sections, consider changing line 127 from:
- port: {{ .Values.certController.metrics.listen.port }}to:
- port: {{ .Values.certController.metrics.service.port }}This assumes that the values structure for the cert-controller is similar to the other components. If not, please disregard this suggestion.
The overall structure of the file is well-organized and consistent. Good job on maintaining a clear and flexible template for the External Secrets Operator's monitoring resources.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/gcraccesstoken.yaml (3)
1-28: LGTM! Consider adding a description annotation.The CRD metadata and basic structure look good. The conditional creation based on
.Values.installCRDsprovides flexibility during installation.Consider adding a
descriptionannotation to provide a brief explanation of the CRD's purpose. This can help users understand the resource at a glance. For example:metadata: annotations: description: "Defines a GCRAccessToken for generating GCP access tokens to authenticate with Google Container Registry."🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
29-121: LGTM! Consider adding validation for projectID.The CRD schema is well-structured and follows Kubernetes best practices. The flexibility in authentication methods (secretRef and workloadIdentity) is a good design choice.
Consider adding a pattern validation for the
projectIDfield to ensure it matches the GCP project ID format. This can prevent configuration errors. For example:projectID: description: ProjectID defines which project to use to authenticate with type: string pattern: ^[a-z][a-z0-9-]{4,28}[a-z0-9]$This regex pattern enforces GCP's project ID naming rules.
122-126: LGTM! Plan for future versioning.The versioning and subresources are correctly defined. The use of
v1alpha1appropriately indicates an early implementation stage.As this CRD matures, consider the following:
- Plan for future versions (e.g., v1beta1, v1) and how you'll handle upgrades.
- Document the deprecation policy for the alpha version.
- Implement conversion webhooks when introducing new versions to ensure backward compatibility.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/webhook.yaml (2)
142-145: LGTM! Version and subresources properly defined.The CRD version and subresources section is correctly configured:
- The v1alpha1 version is appropriate for a new or experimental feature.
- The status subresource is correctly defined, which is a good practice for custom resources.
Consider planning for future versions (e.g., v1beta1, v1) as the Webhook resource matures. This will ensure a smooth upgrade path for users as the API evolves.
146-158: LGTM! Conversion webhook properly configured.The CRD conversion webhook section is well-implemented:
- Conditional enabling based on
.Values.crds.conversion.enabledprovides flexibility.- The use of a conversion webhook is a good practice for handling multiple versions of a CRD.
- The service configuration correctly uses template functions for naming.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the conversion webhook for better readability. For example:
{{- if .Values.crds.conversion.enabled }} # Configure conversion webhook for handling multiple CRD versions conversion: strategy: Webhook webhook: # ... (rest of the configuration) {{- end }}packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/rbac.yaml (2)
282-301: LGTM with a minor suggestion: Service bindings cluster role is well-defined.The service bindings cluster role is correctly configured with read-only permissions for external secrets. The conditional creation based on .Values.rbac.servicebindings.create is a good practice for optional features.
For consistency with the rest of the file, consider wrapping the entire service bindings section in the same conditional block as the rest of the RBAC resources:
{{- if .Values.rbac.create }} # ... (previous RBAC resources) {{- if .Values.rbac.servicebindings.create }} --- apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 kind: ClusterRole # ... (rest of the service bindings cluster role) {{- end }} {{- end }}This change ensures that the service bindings cluster role is only created when both
rbac.createandrbac.servicebindings.createare true, maintaining consistency with the rest of the RBAC resources.
1-1: Consider suppressing yamllint false positive.The yamllint tool is reporting a syntax error on the first line of the file. This is a false positive because the file is a Helm template using Go templating syntax, which is not recognized by yamllint.
To suppress this false positive and improve CI/CD pipeline reliability, consider adding a yamllint configuration file (e.g.,
.yamllint.yaml) in the project root with the following content:extends: default rules: document-start: disable ignore: | charts/**/templates/**This configuration will disable the document start rule and ignore all files in the
templatesdirectories undercharts, which are typically Helm templates.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/ecrauthorizationtoken.yaml (4)
1-15: LGTM! Consider improving readability of conditional statements.The CRD installation condition and metadata are well-structured. The use of conditional statements for annotations is a good practice for flexibility.
Consider using multi-line conditionals for improved readability:
{{- if and .Values.crds.conversion.enabled .Values.webhook.certManager.enabled .Values.webhook.certManager.addInjectorAnnotations }}🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
29-160: LGTM! Comprehensive schema definition with a minor suggestion.The schema definition for ECRAuthorizationToken is well-structured and thoroughly documented. It provides clear descriptions and appropriate property definitions for authentication and configuration.
For consistency, consider adding a brief description to the
specfield, similar to other top-level fields:spec: description: Defines the desired state of ECRAuthorizationToken properties: # ... existing properties ...
161-165: LGTM! Consider future versioning strategy.The CRD versioning is correctly set up with v1alpha1 marked as served and stored. The inclusion of the status subresource is a good practice for Kubernetes controllers.
As this is an alpha version, consider planning for future versions:
- Document the versioning strategy for beta and stable releases.
- Prepare for potential breaking changes and migration paths between versions.
- Consider implementing a conversion webhook for seamless upgrades when introducing new versions.
166-178: LGTM! Well-configured conversion webhook with a suggestion for robustness.The conversion webhook configuration is correctly set up and conditionally enabled. The use of templates for service details enhances maintainability.
Consider adding a check for the existence of the webhook service to improve robustness:
{{- if and .Values.crds.conversion.enabled .Values.webhook.create }} conversion: # ... existing configuration ... {{- end }}This ensures the conversion webhook is only enabled if the webhook service is actually created.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/acraccesstoken.yaml (5)
1-27: LGTM! Consider adding a description annotation.The CRD metadata and basic structure are well-defined. The conditional creation, API version, naming convention, and categorization are all appropriate.
Consider adding a
descriptionannotation to provide a brief overview of the CRD's purpose. This can help users and administrators quickly understand the resource's function. For example:annotations: description: "Defines an ACRAccessToken for generating Azure Container Registry access tokens"🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
28-65: Well-structured schema. Consider future versioning strategy.The CRD spec and schema definition are well-structured, with a detailed OpenAPI v3 schema that clearly describes the resource's properties and purpose.
As this is currently a v1alpha1 version, consider planning for future versioning:
- Document the versioning strategy for this CRD.
- Prepare for potential breaking changes and how they will be handled in future versions.
- Consider implementing a conversion webhook for seamless upgrades when introducing new versions in the future.
66-149: Comprehensive authentication methods. Consider adding examples.The CRD spec includes well-structured definitions for multiple authentication methods (managedIdentity, servicePrincipal, workloadIdentity), providing flexibility and adhering to security best practices.
To enhance usability, consider adding inline examples for each authentication method. This can help users quickly understand how to configure each method. For instance:
auth: managedIdentity: {} # Example for using the pod's managed identity # or servicePrincipal: secretRef: clientId: name: azure-secret key: client-id clientSecret: name: azure-secret key: client-secret # or workloadIdentity: serviceAccountRef: name: my-service-account
150-186: Well-defined additional properties. Consider enhancing scope documentation.The CRD spec includes well-structured additional properties that provide flexibility for different Azure environments and ACR configurations.
To improve the clarity of the
scopeproperty, consider expanding the documentation to include more detailed examples and explanations. For instance:scope: description: | Define the scope for the access token, e.g. pull/push access for a repository. If not provided, it will return a refresh token that has full scope. Note: you need to pin it down to the repository level, there is no wildcard available. Examples: - "repository:my-repository:pull,push" (allows pull and push access to 'my-repository') - "repository:my-repository:pull" (allows only pull access to 'my-repository') - "repository:project/my-repository:pull,push" (for repositories in a project) Multiple scopes can be specified by separating them with spaces: - "repository:repo1:pull repository:repo2:push" See docs for details: https://docs.docker.com/registry/spec/auth/scope/ type: stringThis expanded documentation provides more context and examples, which can help users correctly configure the scope for their specific needs.
192-204: Well-configured conversion webhook. Consider adding health checks.The conversion webhook configuration is well-structured and follows best practices for supporting future CRD versions.
To enhance the reliability of the conversion webhook, consider adding health checks and readiness probes to the webhook service. This can help ensure that the webhook is functioning correctly before it's used for CRD conversion. You can add this to the webhook service definition:
spec: template: spec: containers: - name: webhook readinessProbe: httpGet: path: /healthz port: 9443 scheme: HTTPS initialDelaySeconds: 5 periodSeconds: 10Also, ensure that the webhook service implements the
/healthzendpoint to respond to these health checks.packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/pushsecret.yaml (3)
1-15: LGTM! Consider improving readability of the initial conditional.The CRD metadata and initial setup look good. The conditional creation based on Helm values is a nice touch for flexibility.
Consider breaking the long condition on line 1 into multiple lines for better readability:
{{- if and (.Values.installCRDs) (.Values.crds.createPushSecret) }}🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
371-375: LGTM! Version and subresources are correctly defined.The CRD version and subresources are appropriately set up:
- Version v1alpha1 is correctly marked as served and stored.
- The status subresource is enabled, which is good practice for complex CRDs.
As this is an alpha version, consider planning for future versions (e.g., v1beta1, v1) and how you'll handle API changes and migrations as the resource definition matures.
376-388: LGTM! Conversion webhook is well-configured.The conversion webhook configuration is correctly set up and conditionally included based on Helm values. This provides good flexibility for users who may or may not need the conversion feature.
For consistency with the rest of the file, consider using the same indentation for the conversion block:
{{- if .Values.crds.conversion.enabled }} conversion: strategy: Webhook webhook: conversionReviewVersions: - v1 clientConfig: service: name: {{ include "external-secrets.fullname" . }}-webhook namespace: {{ .Release.Namespace | quote }} path: /convert {{- end }}packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/README.md (3)
11-31: LGTM: Clear installation instructions with a minor suggestionThe installation instructions are comprehensive, including both quick (TL;DR) and detailed steps. The uninstallation instructions and information about Custom Resources are valuable additions.
Consider adding a note about prerequisites (e.g., Kubernetes version, Helm version) to ensure users have the necessary environment set up before installation.
33-225: LGTM: Comprehensive Values section with suggestions for improvementThe Values section provides an extensive list of configuration options in a clear, tabular format. Each option includes its type, default value, and a brief description, which is helpful for users configuring the chart.
Consider the following improvements to enhance the usability of the Values section:
- Add more detailed descriptions for complex options to help users understand their impact.
- Group related options together (e.g., all metrics-related options) for better organization.
- Include examples for non-trivial configurations to guide users in setting up more complex scenarios.
- Add links to relevant documentation for options that require additional context or explanation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~94-~94: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ... an external secret operator deployment be created. | | deploymentAnnotations | ob...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_TO)
[style] ~150-~150: To form a complete sentence, be sure to include a subject or ‘there’.
Context: ...should be applied to ClusterIP as well. Can be IPv4 and/or IPv6. | | service.ipFami...(MISSING_IT_THERE)
[grammar] ~170-~170: The word “setup” is a noun. The verb is spelled with a space.
Context: ...jector enabled, this will automatically setup your webhook's CA to the one used by ce...(NOUN_VERB_CONFUSION)
[uncategorized] ~175-~175: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...fore the currently issued certificate’s expiry cert-manager should renew the certifica...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[grammar] ~176-~176: A hyphen is missing in the adjective “built-in”.
Context: ...g cert-manager support will disable the built in secret and switch to using cert-manager...(BUILT_IN_HYPHEN)
[uncategorized] ~177-~177: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ... Specifies whether a webhook deployment be created. | | webhook.deploymentAnnotati...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_TO)
🪛 Markdownlint
61-61: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
71-71: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
128-128: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
140-140: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
170-170: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
172-172: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
173-173: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
174-174: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
175-175: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
176-176: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
200-200: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
210-210: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
1-225: Address static analysis hints for improved readabilityPlease consider the following improvements based on the static analysis hints:
- Line 94: Add "to" before "be created" for grammatical correctness.
- Line 170: Change "setup" to "set up" as it's being used as a verb.
- Line 176: Add a hyphen to "built-in" for correct spelling.
- Throughout the document: Enclose bare URLs in angle brackets or use proper Markdown link syntax to improve formatting and accessibility.
Example of proper Markdown link syntax:
[External Secrets Documentation](https://external-secrets.io/latest/)These changes will enhance the overall quality and readability of the README.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~94-~94: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ... an external secret operator deployment be created. | | deploymentAnnotations | ob...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_TO)
[style] ~150-~150: To form a complete sentence, be sure to include a subject or ‘there’.
Context: ...should be applied to ClusterIP as well. Can be IPv4 and/or IPv6. | | service.ipFami...(MISSING_IT_THERE)
[grammar] ~170-~170: The word “setup” is a noun. The verb is spelled with a space.
Context: ...jector enabled, this will automatically setup your webhook's CA to the one used by ce...(NOUN_VERB_CONFUSION)
[uncategorized] ~175-~175: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...fore the currently issued certificate’s expiry cert-manager should renew the certifica...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[grammar] ~176-~176: A hyphen is missing in the adjective “built-in”.
Context: ...g cert-manager support will disable the built in secret and switch to using cert-manager...(BUILT_IN_HYPHEN)
[uncategorized] ~177-~177: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ... Specifies whether a webhook deployment be created. | | webhook.deploymentAnnotati...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_TO)
🪛 Markdownlint
61-61: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
71-71: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
128-128: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
140-140: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
170-170: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
172-172: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
173-173: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
174-174: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
175-175: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
176-176: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
200-200: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
210-210: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/externalsecret.yaml (1)
1-820: Overall, the ExternalSecret CRD is well-defined and follows best practicesThis Custom Resource Definition for ExternalSecrets is thoughtfully designed and implemented. Key strengths include:
- Use of Helm templating for flexible installation and configuration.
- Support for multiple API versions (v1alpha1 and v1beta1) with a clear deprecation path.
- Comprehensive schema definitions with detailed descriptions.
- Inclusion of a conversion webhook for seamless version upgrades.
To further improve this CRD, consider adding a comment at the top of the file explaining its purpose and linking to the project's documentation. This can help users and maintainers quickly understand the context of this CRD. For example:
{{- if .Values.installCRDs }} # ExternalSecret CRD # This CRD defines the ExternalSecret resource for the external-secrets operator. # For more information, see: https://external-secrets.io/latest/ apiVersion: apiextensions.k8s.io/v1 kind: CustomResourceDefinition ...🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/vaultdynamicsecret.yaml (2)
578-584: Consider adding a warning about performance implications.The
forwardInconsistentfield is well-documented, but it might be helpful to add a note about potential performance implications of enabling this feature.Consider adding a note like:
description: |- ForwardInconsistent tells Vault to forward read-after-write requests to the Vault leader instead of simply retrying within a loop. This can increase performance if the option is enabled serverside, but may also introduce additional latency in some scenarios. Use with caution and test thoroughly in your environment.
1-708: Security Considerations and Best PracticesThis CRD provides a comprehensive and flexible way to integrate with Vault, which is excellent for usability but requires careful consideration from a security perspective:
- Ensure that all referenced secrets (SecretRefs) are properly managed and rotated regularly.
- Use the most secure authentication method appropriate for your use case. For example, prefer Kubernetes service account authentication over static tokens where possible.
- Implement the principle of least privilege when configuring Vault roles and policies.
- Regularly audit and review the permissions granted to VaultDynamicSecret resources.
- Consider using Vault's namespaces feature (Enterprise only) for better isolation between different teams or environments.
- Ensure that the Vault server URL uses HTTPS and that proper TLS verification is in place.
While this CRD provides the structure, the security of the system depends on proper configuration and management of both Kubernetes and Vault components.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/Chart.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (43)
- packages/core/platform/bundles/distro-full.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/core/platform/bundles/paas-full.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/.helmignore (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/Chart.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/Makefile (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/Chart.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/README.md (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/NOTES.txt (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/_helpers.tpl (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-deployment.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-poddisruptionbudget.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-rbac.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-service.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-serviceaccount.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/acraccesstoken.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/clusterexternalsecret.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/ecrauthorizationtoken.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/externalsecret.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/fake.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/gcraccesstoken.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/githubaccesstoken.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/password.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/pushsecret.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/uuid.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/vaultdynamicsecret.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/webhook.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/deployment.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/extra-manifests.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/poddisruptionbudget.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/rbac.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/service.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/serviceaccount.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/servicemonitor.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/validatingwebhook.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-certificate.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-deployment.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-poddisruptionbudget.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-secret.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-service.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-serviceaccount.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/values.schema.json (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/values.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/external-secrets-operator/values.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
packages/core/platform/bundles/distro-full.yaml
[error] 148-148: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
packages/core/platform/bundles/paas-full.yaml
[error] 224-224: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/Chart.yaml
[error] 3-3: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-deployment.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-poddisruptionbudget.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-rbac.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 12-12: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 14-14: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 20-20: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 22-22: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 24-24: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 28-28: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 30-30: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 32-32: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 35-35: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 38-38: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 40-40: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 42-42: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 46-46: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 48-48: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 50-50: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 53-53: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 55-55: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 57-57: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 63-63: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 65-65: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 67-67: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-service.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-serviceaccount.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 11-11: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/acraccesstoken.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/clusterexternalsecret.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/ecrauthorizationtoken.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/externalsecret.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/fake.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/gcraccesstoken.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/githubaccesstoken.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/password.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/pushsecret.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/uuid.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/vaultdynamicsecret.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/webhook.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/deployment.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/extra-manifests.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/poddisruptionbudget.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/rbac.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/service.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/serviceaccount.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 11-11: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/servicemonitor.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/validatingwebhook.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-certificate.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-deployment.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-poddisruptionbudget.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 12-12: wrong indentation: expected 0 but found 2
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-secret.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-service.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-serviceaccount.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 11-11: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/values.yaml
[error] 3-3: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🪛 LanguageTool
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/README.md
[uncategorized] ~94-~94: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ... an external secret operator deployment be created. | | deploymentAnnotations | ob...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_TO)
[style] ~150-~150: To form a complete sentence, be sure to include a subject or ‘there’.
Context: ...should be applied to ClusterIP as well. Can be IPv4 and/or IPv6. | | service.ipFami...(MISSING_IT_THERE)
[grammar] ~170-~170: The word “setup” is a noun. The verb is spelled with a space.
Context: ...jector enabled, this will automatically setup your webhook's CA to the one used by ce...(NOUN_VERB_CONFUSION)
[uncategorized] ~175-~175: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...fore the currently issued certificate’s expiry cert-manager should renew the certifica...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[grammar] ~176-~176: A hyphen is missing in the adjective “built-in”.
Context: ...g cert-manager support will disable the built in secret and switch to using cert-manager...(BUILT_IN_HYPHEN)
[uncategorized] ~177-~177: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ... Specifies whether a webhook deployment be created. | | webhook.deploymentAnnotati...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_TO)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/NOTES.txt
[uncategorized] ~1-~1: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...template "external-secrets.namespace" . }}! In order to begin using ExternalSecr...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[style] ~2-~2: Consider a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...ate "external-secrets.namespace" . }}! In order to begin using ExternalSecrets, you will n...(IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)
🪛 Markdownlint
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/README.md
61-61: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
71-71: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
128-128: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
140-140: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
170-170: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
172-172: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
173-173: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
174-174: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
175-175: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
176-176: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
200-200: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
210-210: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
🔇 Additional comments (139)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/values.yaml (1)
4-4: Excellent! CRD installation is crucial for the operator.Setting
installCRDs: trueis essential for the proper functioning of the external-secrets-operator. This ensures that the necessary Custom Resource Definitions are installed during deployment, which aligns perfectly with the PR objective of integrating the operator into the main bundles.This configuration will enable the system to effectively manage secrets from various external providers as mentioned in the PR objectives.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/extra-manifests.yaml (1)
1-4: LGTM! Implementation aligns with PR objectives.This template section effectively allows for dynamic inclusion of additional Kubernetes objects specified in the Helm chart values. It iterates over
extraObjectsand renders each one using theexternal-secrets.rendertemplate, which aligns well with the PR objective of integrating the external-secrets-operator into the main bundles of the project.The implementation is correct and follows Helm best practices:
- It uses a range loop to iterate over
extraObjects.- It correctly uses the
---separator to denote new YAML documents.- It leverages the
includefunction with a named template for rendering.- It properly passes the necessary context to the template.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/Chart.yaml (1)
1-3: LGTM! Chart metadata looks good.The Chart.yaml file is correctly structured with the appropriate API version, chart name, and a placeholder version. This aligns well with the PR objective of integrating the external-secrets-operator.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 3-3: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/Makefile (2)
1-2: LGTM: Clear and consistent variable definitions.The variable definitions are clear and follow good practices. Using
$(NAME)inNAMESPACEensures consistency if the name changes in the future.
1-11: Overall assessment: Well-structured Makefile for managing external-secrets-operator.This Makefile effectively sets up the necessary structure and update mechanism for the external-secrets-operator package. It aligns well with the PR objectives of integrating the external-secrets-operator into the main bundles of the project.
Key points:
- Clear variable definitions for NAME and NAMESPACE.
- Inclusion of a shared makefile for common targets/variables.
- A comprehensive update target for fetching and preparing the latest external-secrets chart.
The suggested improvements in error handling and versioning would further enhance the robustness and flexibility of this Makefile.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/NOTES.txt (1)
1-2: LGTM: Clear success message with proper templating.The success message is informative and uses templating correctly to display the namespace. The empty line provides good spacing for readability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~1-~1: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...template "external-secrets.namespace" . }}! In order to begin using ExternalSecr...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[style] ~2-~2: Consider a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...ate "external-secrets.namespace" . }}! In order to begin using ExternalSecrets, you will n...(IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/serviceaccount.yaml (5)
1-1: LGTM: Conditional ServiceAccount creationThe conditional creation of the ServiceAccount based on
.Values.serviceAccount.createprovides flexibility in managing ServiceAccounts. This aligns well with the PR objective of enhancing secret management capabilities.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
2-11: LGTM: Well-structured ServiceAccount metadataThe metadata section is well-structured:
- Using templates for name and namespace promotes consistency.
- Including labels from a template and allowing extra labels provides flexibility.
Note: The yamllint warning about indentation on lines 10-11 appears to be a false positive. The indentation is correct for YAML within Helm templates.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 11-11: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
12-15: LGTM: Flexible annotation managementThe conditional inclusion of annotations based on
.Values.serviceAccount.annotationsprovides flexibility in managing ServiceAccount metadata. This approach aligns well with Kubernetes best practices for resource configuration.
1-1: Note: Ignore yamllint syntax errorThe yamllint tool reports a syntax error on this line, but this is a false positive. The
{{- if ... -}}syntax is correct for Helm templates and is commonly used for conditional resource creation in Kubernetes manifests.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
1-16: LGTM: Well-implemented ServiceAccount for external-secrets-operatorThis ServiceAccount definition is well-implemented and aligns perfectly with the PR objective of integrating the external-secrets-operator. Key points:
- Conditional creation allows for flexible deployment.
- Proper use of Helm templates for name, namespace, and labels.
- Support for custom labels and annotations.
The implementation follows Kubernetes and Helm best practices, providing a solid foundation for managing external secrets in the cluster.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 11-11: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-serviceaccount.yaml (5)
1-1: LGTM: Conditional creation and overall structureThe conditional statement ensures that the ServiceAccount is only created when both
.Values.webhook.createand.Values.webhook.serviceAccount.createare true. This approach provides flexibility in configuration through Helm values and follows best practices for Kubernetes YAML templates.Also applies to: 16-16
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
2-3: LGTM: Correct apiVersion and kind for ServiceAccountThe
apiVersion: v1andkind: ServiceAccountare correctly specified for a Kubernetes ServiceAccount resource.
4-6: LGTM: Proper use of template functions for name and namespaceThe ServiceAccount's name and namespace are correctly defined using template functions:
name: {{ include "external-secrets-webhook.serviceAccountName" . }}namespace: {{ template "external-secrets.namespace" . }}This approach allows for dynamic configuration and maintains consistency with the chart's naming scheme.
1-1: Note: Ignore yamllint syntax error for Helm conditionalThe yamllint error
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'is a false positive. This error occurs because yamllint doesn't recognize Helm template syntax, specifically the conditional statement at the beginning of the file.If you want to suppress this warning in future linting, you can add a yamllint configuration file (
.yamllint.yaml) in the project root with the following content:rules: document-start: disableThis will disable the rule that expects a document start marker, which is causing the false positive in this case.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
7-15: LGTM: Flexible label and annotation configurationThe labels and annotations are well-structured:
- Labels include both template-generated and conditional extra labels.
- Annotations are conditionally included.
- The
nindentfunction is used correctly to maintain proper indentation.This approach provides flexibility in configuration while maintaining readability.
Regarding the yamllint warnings about indentation on lines 10 and 11, these appear to be false positives. The indentation is correct for YAML within Helm templates. To verify this, you can run the following command:
This command will render the template and pipe it through yamllint, which should not produce any indentation warnings if the template is rendered correctly.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 11-11: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/Chart.yaml (3)
1-2: LGTM: Chart metadata is well-defined and consistent.The chart metadata is correctly specified:
- Using Helm v2 API version
- Consistent appVersion and chart version (0.10.4)
- Correct chart name and type
Also applies to: 18-20
8-9: LGTM: Description and home URL are accurate.The description succinctly explains the chart's purpose, and the home URL correctly points to the project's GitHub repository.
3-7: Verify the bitwarden-sdk-server dependency version.The dependency is well-defined with a conditional enable flag and uses a secure OCI repository. However, please verify if the version
v0.3.1ofbitwarden-sdk-serveris the latest compatible version withexternal-secrets v0.10.4.To check for the latest version of the bitwarden-sdk-server chart, run:
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-serviceaccount.yaml (3)
1-1: LGTM: Well-structured conditional creation.The conditional statement effectively ensures that the ServiceAccount is only created when necessary, preventing resource conflicts and adhering to the principle of least privilege.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
1-1: Note: Disregard the yamllint syntax error.The static analysis tool (yamllint) reported a syntax error on this line, but it's a false positive. The
{{-syntax is valid for Helm templates and is used for control flow in Helm charts. No action is required to address this reported issue.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
1-16: Summary: Well-implemented ServiceAccount for cert-controller.This file successfully implements a ServiceAccount for the cert-controller component of the external-secrets-operator. The use of Helm templating provides flexibility and conditional creation, aligning well with the PR objectives of integrating the external-secrets-operator and providing unified secret management.
Key points:
- Conditional creation ensures the ServiceAccount is only created when necessary.
- Flexible naming and labeling support adaptability to different environments.
- The ability to add custom labels and annotations enhances configurability.
These features contribute to the overall goal of improving secret management capabilities and flexibility in the project. The minor indentation issues, once addressed, will further improve the file's readability and maintainability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 11-11: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/poddisruptionbudget.yaml (2)
4-8: Metadata section looks good!The metadata is well-structured and uses appropriate templating for name, namespace, and labels. This ensures consistency across the Helm chart and makes the PDB easily identifiable.
16-18: Selector section is well-implemented.The selector is correctly defined using
matchLabelsand utilizes theexternal-secrets.selectorLabelstemplate. This approach ensures consistency with other resources in the Helm chart.packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-poddisruptionbudget.yaml (3)
1-1: LGTM: Conditional creation of PodDisruptionBudgetThe conditional logic for creating the PodDisruptionBudget is well-implemented. It ensures that the PDB is only created when both the webhook is created and the PDB is explicitly enabled, providing flexibility in configuration.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
17-19: LGTM: Properly configured selectorThe selector is correctly structured for a PodDisruptionBudget, using matchLabels to select the appropriate pods. The use of a template function for labels ensures consistency with other resources in the Helm chart.
1-20: Summary: Well-implemented PodDisruptionBudget for external-secrets-operator webhookThis new file successfully implements a PodDisruptionBudget for the webhook component of the external-secrets-operator, aligning with the PR objectives. The implementation follows Kubernetes and Helm best practices, providing flexible configuration options and ensuring proper integration with the existing chart structure.
Key points:
- Conditional creation allows for flexible deployment scenarios.
- Proper use of Helm templates ensures consistency across resources.
- The PodDisruptionBudget will help maintain the availability of the webhook component, contributing to the overall reliability of the external-secrets-operator.
This addition enhances the robustness of the external-secrets-operator deployment, supporting the PR's goal of improving secret management capabilities and overall system reliability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 12-12: wrong indentation: expected 0 but found 2
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-poddisruptionbudget.yaml (4)
1-1: LGTM: Well-structured conditional creation of PodDisruptionBudgetThe conditional statement effectively controls when to create the PodDisruptionBudget for the cert-controller. It ensures that the PDB is only created when necessary and aligns with the configuration of other components.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
5-8: LGTM: Proper use of Helm template functions and indentationThe template uses appropriate Helm functions for generating consistent names, namespaces, and labels. The use of
nindentensures correct YAML indentation, which is crucial for both readability and proper parsing of the resource.Also applies to: 17-18
1-1: False positive: YAML syntax error in Helm templateThe static analysis tool (yamllint) reports a syntax error on this line, but this is a false positive. The error occurs because the file starts with a Helm conditional statement (
{{- if ...}}), which is valid in a Helm template but not in standard YAML.Static analysis tools often struggle with Helm templates because they interpret them as pure YAML files. In this case, the YAML content starts after the conditional, which is the correct structure for Helm templates.
No action is required to address this error.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
1-19: Summary: Well-implemented PodDisruptionBudget for cert-controllerThis new file successfully introduces a PodDisruptionBudget for the cert-controller, which aligns with the PR objective of integrating the external-secrets-operator securely and flexibly. The Helm template is well-structured, uses appropriate conditional logic, and follows best practices for resource definition and labeling.
The implementation contributes to the "Unified Secret Management" and "Enhanced Security" benefits mentioned in the PR objectives by ensuring the availability of the cert-controller, which is crucial for secure secret management.
While the current implementation is functional, consider the suggested improvement to the PDB spec for added robustness. This change would further enhance the reliability of the external-secrets-operator integration.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/service.yaml (6)
9-12: LGTM! Annotations are handled correctly.The conditional inclusion of annotations and the use of
toYamlfor proper YAML formatting is correct and follows best practices.
21-25: LGTM! Port configuration is correct.The ports configuration for the metrics service is well-defined. Using a variable for the port number (
{{ .Values.metrics.service.port }}) allows for flexibility in configuration.
1-1: Note: Ignore the yamllint error for this line.The yamllint tool reported a syntax error on this line, but this is a false positive. The
{{- if ... }}syntax is valid for Helm templates, even though it may confuse YAML linters. No action is required to address this error.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
1-28: Summary: The service.yaml file aligns well with the PR objectives.This new file successfully introduces a Kubernetes Service resource for metrics collection in the external-secrets-operator chart. The implementation:
- Supports the PR objective of integrating the external-secrets-operator by providing a metrics endpoint.
- Enhances the application's ability to manage secrets securely by exposing metrics for monitoring.
- Provides flexibility through conditional creation and configurable settings.
The overall structure and use of Helm templating are well-implemented, following best practices for Kubernetes resource definitions and Helm chart development.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
26-28: LGTM! Selector configuration uses best practices.The use of the
external-secrets.selectorLabelstemplate for the selector ensures consistency and follows Kubernetes best practices for label management.To ensure the selector labels are correctly defined, you can run the following command to check the template definition:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the definition of external-secrets.selectorLabels template grep -R "external-secrets.selectorLabels" packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/_helpers.tplThis will help verify that the selector labels are properly defined in the
_helpers.tplfile.
13-20: LGTM with a minor concern about IP family settings.The service specification is generally correct, with ClusterIP being appropriate for internal metrics collection.
However, there's a potential issue with the values used for
ipFamilyPolicyandipFamilies. The template is using.Values.service.ipFamilyPolicyand.Values.service.ipFamilies, but these might not be the correct paths for a metrics service. Please verify if these should be under.Values.metrics.serviceinstead.To check this, you can run the following command:
If the grep command doesn't return any results, consider updating the paths or removing these settings if they're not applicable to the metrics service.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-service.yaml (3)
2-3: LGTM: Correct API version and kind for a Kubernetes Service.The
apiVersion: v1andkind: Serviceare correctly specified for a Kubernetes Service resource.
1-1: Note: Ignore yamllint error for Helm template syntax.The yamllint tool reports a syntax error on this line, but this is a false positive. The
{{-syntax is valid for Helm templates and is used to control whitespace in the rendered YAML. No action is required to address this error.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
1-28: Overall assessment: Well-implemented Kubernetes Service for external-secrets-operator metrics.This file introduces a new Kubernetes Service resource for the certificate controller's metrics, which aligns well with the PR objectives of integrating the external-secrets-operator. The implementation makes effective use of Helm templating to create a highly configurable and flexible resource.
Key points:
- Conditional creation ensures the service is only deployed when necessary.
- Appropriate use of templating functions for consistency and flexibility.
- Well-structured metadata and spec sections.
- Configurable IP family settings and port configuration.
The suggestions provided in the review are minor and aimed at improving readability and maintainability. Overall, this is a solid implementation that enhances the project's secret management capabilities as intended.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-service.yaml (5)
1-9: LGTM! Good use of conditional creation and helper templates.The Service resource is well-defined with appropriate metadata. The conditional creation based on
.Values.webhook.createallows for flexible deployment options. The use of helper templates for name and namespace promotes consistency across resources.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
1-1: Note on static analysis warningThe yamllint tool reported a syntax error on this line, but this appears to be a false positive. The
{{- if ... }}syntax is valid for Helm templates and is correctly used here. No action is required.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
35-37: LGTM! Verify the selector template implementation.The use of a helper template for selector labels is a good practice, promoting consistency across resources.
Verify the implementation of the
external-secrets-webhook.selectorLabelstemplate:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the implementation of the selector labels template # Test: Search for the selectorLabels template definition rg --type yaml 'external-secrets-webhook.selectorLabels' packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/_helpers.tpl
16-23: LGTM! Verify IP family configuration if used.The Service spec is well-configured with appropriate type and conditional IP family settings.
If IP family configuration is used, verify that the values are correctly set in the values file:
24-34: LGTM! Verify port values in the values file.The Service ports are well-configured with appropriate settings for both webhook and metrics (conditional) traffic.
Verify that the port values are correctly set in the values file:
✅ Verification successful
Further verification needed for port configurations
The initial check did not locate the webhook and metrics port values in
values.yaml. Please run the following script to search for port configurations across the repository:
Verification of port values in
values.yamlTo ensure that the port values for
webhookandmetricsare correctly set, please run the following script to extract and review the port configurations fromvalues.yaml:
Further verification required for port configurations in
values.yamlThe initial extraction did not locate
webhook.portandwebhook.metrics.service.portinvalues.yaml. To ensure all relevant port values are captured, please run the following script to perform a more comprehensive search:
Port values in
values.yamlare correctly configuredThe port values for both
webhookandmetricsare properly set in thevalues.yaml:
webhook.portis set to10250, correctly mapped to service port443.webhook.metrics.service.portis consistently set to8080across relevant configurations.No issues were found with the port configurations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check port values in the values file # Test: Search for webhook and metrics port configuration rg --type yaml '(webhook|metrics):\s*\n\s*(port|service:\s*\n\s*port):' packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/values.yamlLength of output: 318
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for webhook and metrics port configurations across the repository rg --type yaml '(webhook|metrics).*port' packages/system/external-secrets-operator/Length of output: 2826
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract webhook and metrics port values from values.yaml # Extract webhook port echo "webhook.port:" rg '^webhook\.port\s*:' packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/values.yaml | awk '{print $2}' # Extract webhook.metrics.service.port echo "webhook.metrics.service.port:" rg '^webhook\.metrics\.service\.port\s*:' packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/values.yaml | awk '{print $2}'Length of output: 365
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract all port values under webhook and metrics from values.yaml echo "Extracting all port values under 'webhook':" rg 'webhook' -A5 packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/values.yaml | rg 'port:' | awk '{print $2}' echo "" echo "Extracting all port values under 'metrics':" rg 'metrics' -A5 packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/values.yaml | rg 'port:' | awk '{print $2}'Length of output: 502
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-certificate.yaml (4)
1-5: LGTM: Conditional Certificate resource creationThe conditional statement ensures that the Certificate resource is only created when necessary, based on the specified Helm values. This approach provides flexibility in deployment configurations.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
1-1: False positive: YAML syntax errorThe yamllint tool reported a syntax error on this line, but this is a false positive. The
{{- if ... }}statement is a valid Helm template directive and is correctly used here to conditionally render the YAML resource. No action is required to address this warning.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
1-30: Well-implemented Certificate resource for external-secrets-operator webhookThis file successfully implements a Certificate resource for the external-secrets-operator webhook, aligning well with the PR objectives. Key points:
- Conditional creation allows for flexible deployment configurations.
- Proper use of Helm templates ensures consistency and customization.
- The certificate specification is correctly set up for the webhook service.
- Optional fields provide flexibility in certificate lifecycle management.
The implementation contributes to the "Unified Secret Management" and "Enhanced Security" benefits mentioned in the PR objectives by ensuring secure communication for the webhook component of the external-secrets-operator.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
15-22: LGTM: Properly configured certificate specThe certificate specification is well-structured with appropriate commonName and dnsNames for the webhook service. The use of Helm templates ensures consistency across the deployment.
Ensure that the issuerRef configuration in the Helm values (
webhook.certManager.cert.issuerRef) is properly set up in your cert-manager environment. Run the following command to verify:Replace
<release-name>and<namespace>with your actual Helm release name and namespace.packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-rbac.yaml (3)
1-7: LGTM: Conditional creation and metadata look good.The conditional statement on line 1 ensures that this RBAC configuration is only created when:
- The cert controller is enabled (
certController.create)- RBAC for the cert controller is enabled (
certController.rbac.create)- The cert-manager webhook is not enabled (
not .Values.webhook.certManager.enabled)This approach allows for flexible deployment configurations. The use of template functions for naming and labels promotes consistency across the Helm chart.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
8-70: LGTM: ClusterRole rules are well-defined and follow the principle of least privilege.The ClusterRole rules grant appropriate permissions for the certificate controller to manage custom resource definitions, validating webhook configurations, endpoints, events, secrets, and leases. The permissions are carefully scoped to specific API groups and resources, adhering to security best practices.
Note: The static analysis tool flagged indentation issues, but these appear to be false positives. The YAML indentation in this file is correct and consistent.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 12-12: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 14-14: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 20-20: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 22-22: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 24-24: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 28-28: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 30-30: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 32-32: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 35-35: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 38-38: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 40-40: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 42-42: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 46-46: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 48-48: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 50-50: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 53-53: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 55-55: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 57-57: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 63-63: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 65-65: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 67-67: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
71-85: LGTM: ClusterRoleBinding is correctly configured.The ClusterRoleBinding properly associates the previously defined ClusterRole with the appropriate ServiceAccount. The use of template functions for naming and namespace ensures consistency across the Helm chart and allows for flexible deployments in different environments.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/uuid.yaml (4)
16-28: LGTM! CRD spec is well-defined.The CRD spec section is correctly structured and follows Kubernetes naming conventions. The use of categories and namespaced scope is appropriate for this resource type.
56-59: LGTM! Status subresource is correctly defined.The inclusion of the status subresource is a good practice, allowing for separate RBAC controls and status updates.
1-72: Note on static analysis warningsThe static analysis tool has flagged some issues, but they appear to be false positives:
- The syntax error on line 1 is due to the Helm template directive, which is valid in this context.
- The indentation warnings on lines 8-10 are related to the use of the
nindentfunction in Helm templates, which is correct for this use case.These warnings can be safely ignored as they are artifacts of the static analysis tool not fully understanding Helm template syntax.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
1-72: Overall assessment: Well-implemented CRD for UUID generationThis CustomResourceDefinition for UUID generators is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives of integrating the external-secrets-operator. Key points:
- The use of Helm templates provides flexibility in deployment.
- The CRD follows Kubernetes best practices for naming and structure.
- The inclusion of a conversion webhook allows for future versioning.
- The UUID generator adds useful functionality for unique identifier generation in secret management.
The implementation is solid, with only minor suggestions for improved documentation. This addition enhances the project's secret management capabilities as intended.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/validatingwebhook.yaml (2)
1-1: LGTM: Conditional webhook creationThe use of a conditional check for creating the webhook configurations is a good practice. It allows for flexibility in deployment scenarios where the webhook might not be needed or desired.
Also applies to: 78-78
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
1-78: Overall assessment: Well-implemented webhook configurationsThis file successfully introduces ValidatingWebhookConfigurations for the External Secrets Operator, which aligns with the PR objectives. The configurations are well-structured, follow Kubernetes best practices, and provide the necessary validation for secretstore, clustersecretstore, and externalsecret resources.
Key points:
- Conditional creation allows for flexible deployment.
- Proper handling of both namespaced and cluster-scoped resources.
- Consistent structure across different webhook configurations.
- Use of Helm templating for maintainability and consistency.
The suggested improvements (adding
failurePolicyto all webhooks and resolving the linter issue) are minor and do not detract from the overall quality of the implementation.This implementation effectively supports the integration of the external-secrets-operator into the main bundles of the project, enhancing the application's ability to manage secrets securely and efficiently.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/fake.yaml (5)
1-3: LGTM: Conditional CRD installation with correct API version.The conditional installation of the CRD based on
.Values.installCRDsprovides flexibility in deployment. The use ofapiextensions.k8s.io/v1is appropriate for Kubernetes 1.16+.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
16-28: LGTM: Well-defined CRD specification.The CRD specification is well-structured and follows Kubernetes best practices:
- Appropriate group name: "generators.external-secrets.io"
- Clear naming conventions with useful shortnames
- Relevant categories for grouping
- Correct use of Namespaced scope
1-10: Note on static analysis warnings.The static analysis tool (yamllint) reported some issues, but these appear to be false positives:
- The syntax error on line 1 is due to the Helm template directive, which is valid in this context.
- The indentation warnings on lines 8, 9, and 10 are caused by the Helm templating structure, which is correct for this use case.
These warnings can be safely ignored as they do not represent actual issues in the YAML structure or Helm template.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
1-87: Overall assessment: Well-implemented CRD for Fake generator.This new Custom Resource Definition (CRD) for the "Fake" generator is a valuable addition to the external-secrets-operator integration. Key points:
- The CRD is well-structured and follows Kubernetes best practices.
- Helm templating is used effectively, providing flexibility in deployment.
- The "Fake" generator serves as a useful tool for testing and development scenarios.
- The implementation aligns well with the PR objectives of integrating the external-secrets-operator.
The CRD provides a solid foundation for defining static sets of credentials, which will be beneficial for testing and development purposes within the external-secrets ecosystem.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
75-87: LGTM: Flexible conversion webhook configuration.The conversion webhook configuration is well-structured and conditionally enabled, providing flexibility in deployment. The use of templating for service details ensures consistency across the chart.
To ensure the webhook service is correctly defined elsewhere in the chart, please run the following verification script:
This will help confirm that the referenced webhook service is properly defined in the chart.
✅ Verification successful
Action Required: Update Verification Script for Templated Syntax
The previous verification script encountered a regex parse error due to the templated Helm syntax. Please use the following updated script to account for the templating:
This script escapes the curly braces and other special characters to prevent regex parsing errors and accurately search for the webhook service definition.
Action Required: Update Verification Script to Search All YAML Files
The previous verification attempt did not search any files due to an overly restrictive pattern. Please use the following updated script to search all YAML files for the webhook service definition:
LGTM: Flexible conversion webhook configuration verified.
The webhook service definition exists and is consistently referenced across the necessary YAML templates, including
fake.yaml. This confirms that the conversion webhook configuration is correctly implemented and no issues were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the webhook service definition # Test: Search for the webhook service definition rg --type yaml -g 'templates/*.yaml' "name: {{ include \"external-secrets.fullname\" . }}-webhook"Length of output: 245
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the webhook service definition with escaped templating # Test: Search for the webhook service definition with escaped curly braces rg --type yaml -g 'templates/*.yaml' "name: \{\{ include \"external-secrets\.fullname\" \. \}\}-webhook"Length of output: 253
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the webhook service definition across all YAML templates # Test: Search for the webhook service definition with escaped templating in all YAML files rg --type yaml "name: \{\{ include \"external-secrets\.fullname\" \. \}\}-webhook"Length of output: 4057
packages/core/platform/bundles/distro-full.yaml (1)
144-148: LGTM: New release entry for external-secrets-operator looks good.The new release entry for
external-secrets-operatoris well-structured and consistent with other entries in the file. It aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of integrating the external-secrets-operator into the main bundles of the project. The dependency onciliumis appropriate, following the pattern of other components in the file.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 148-148: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/password.yaml (2)
1-109: Static analysis hints can be safely ignored.The yamllint warnings and errors reported are false positives due to the nature of Helm templates:
- The syntax error at line 1 is due to the Helm conditional statement
{{- if .Values.installCRDs }}, which is valid in the context of a Helm template.- The indentation warnings are also false positives because the Helm templating affects the final YAML structure.
These issues do not affect the functionality or correctness of the CRD definition.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
92-108: LGTM! Verify webhook service configuration.The status subresource and conversion webhook configuration are correctly defined and allow for flexible deployment options.
Please verify that the webhook service configuration matches the actual service created by the Helm chart. Run the following script to check the service configuration:
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/githubaccesstoken.yaml (4)
16-28: LGTM! Well-structured CRD specification.The CRD spec and names section is well-defined. The use of appropriate singular, plural, and list kinds, along with the "Namespaced" scope, aligns with Kubernetes best practices for Custom Resource Definitions.
97-100: LGTM! Proper version and subresource configuration.The configuration of the v1alpha1 version as both served and stored is appropriate for a new CRD. The inclusion of the status subresource is a good practice, allowing for better management of the resource's status.
1-10: Static analysis warnings can be ignored.The static analysis tool has flagged some issues, but they can be safely ignored:
- The syntax error on line 1 is a false positive. The
-is part of the correct Helm template syntax.- The indentation warnings for lines 8, 9, and 10 are also false positives. The indentation is correct for the nested Helm template structure.
These warnings are common when static analysis tools don't fully understand the context of Helm templates.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
1-113: Overall, excellent implementation of the GithubAccessToken CRD.This new file successfully introduces the GithubAccessToken Custom Resource Definition, which is a crucial component for integrating the external-secrets-operator. The implementation is well-structured, follows Kubernetes best practices, and makes good use of Helm templating for flexible configuration.
Key strengths:
- Conditional CRD installation
- Comprehensive schema definition with clear descriptions
- Proper naming conventions and resource scoping
- Inclusion of a status subresource
- Flexible conversion webhook configuration
The CRD provides a solid foundation for managing GitHub access tokens within the Kubernetes ecosystem, aligning well with the PR objectives of enhancing secret management capabilities.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/webhook-deployment.yaml (5)
1-18: LGTM: Metadata and initial spec section look good.The deployment configuration starts with a conditional creation, which provides flexibility. The use of templates for name and namespace promotes consistency across the chart. The revision history limit is set, which is a good practice for managing deployment versions.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
19-29: LGTM: Pod template metadata is well-structured.The pod template metadata allows for custom annotations and labels, providing good flexibility for users to add their own metadata. The use of templates for labels ensures consistency with the rest of the chart.
102-128: LGTM: Volumes and advanced scheduling are well-configured.The deployment configuration for volumes and advanced scheduling is comprehensive and flexible:
- Volumes are properly defined, with the certificate secret mounted as expected.
- Advanced scheduling options (node selector, affinity, tolerations, topology spread constraints) allow for fine-grained control over pod placement.
- The use of global values with local overrides (
{{ .Values.webhook.nodeSelector | default .Values.global.nodeSelector }}) is a good practice for maintaining consistency while allowing customization.Overall, this deployment configuration for the external-secrets-operator webhook is well-structured, secure, and highly customizable. It follows Kubernetes best practices and provides users with the flexibility to adapt the deployment to their specific needs.
1-1: Note: Ignore the yamllint syntax error.The yamllint tool reported a syntax error on this line, but it's a false positive. The
{{- if .Values.webhook.create }}is valid Helm template syntax used for conditional rendering of the deployment. No action is required.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
44-101: LGTM: Container configuration is comprehensive. Verify certificate handling.The container configuration is well-structured with appropriate settings for security, resources, and customization. The readiness probe is properly configured, which is crucial for ensuring the webhook is ready to accept requests.
Please confirm that the certificate handling is secure:
- Certificates are mounted as a read-only volume (good practice observed).
- Verify that certificate rotation is handled properly.
#!/bin/bash # Check for certificate rotation or renewal logic rg --type yaml 'cert-manager.io/inject-ca-from' -g '*.yaml' rg --type yaml 'certmanager.k8s.io/inject-ca-from' -g '*.yaml'If cert-manager is not used, ensure there's a process in place for certificate renewal.
The rest of the container configuration looks good and provides necessary flexibility for customization.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/cert-controller-deployment.yaml (6)
1-12: LGTM: Flexible deployment configuration with proper metadata.The conditional creation and metadata section are well-structured:
- Conditional creation allows for flexible deployment scenarios.
- Consistent naming and namespacing through templates.
- Standardized labeling using templates.
- Optional annotations for customization.
This approach aligns with Kubernetes best practices for deployment configuration.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
97-104: LGTM: Flexible volume configuration.The volume configuration section is well-implemented:
- Conditional addition of extra volume mounts and volumes.
- Provides flexibility for custom storage or configuration requirements.
This approach allows users to extend the deployment's capabilities without modifying the core template.
105-116: LGTM: Excellent pod scheduling configuration.The node selection and affinity section is very well implemented:
- Configurable node selector, affinity, and tolerations.
- Option to set values globally or specifically for the cert-controller.
This configuration provides:
- Flexibility in pod scheduling.
- Fine-tuned control over pod placement.
- Ability to optimize resource usage.
- Support for ensuring high availability.
These features are crucial for deploying the cert-controller effectively in various Kubernetes environments.
117-120: LGTM: Well-implemented topology spread constraints.The topology spread constraints section is properly configured:
- Allows setting constraints globally or specifically for the cert-controller.
- Enables fine-grained control over pod distribution across topology domains.
This feature is important for:
- Ensuring high availability by spreading pods across different failure domains.
- Optimizing resource utilization across the cluster.
- Improving application performance by reducing network latency.
The flexibility to set these constraints globally or specifically for the cert-controller allows for tailored deployment strategies based on specific requirements.
1-1: Note: Disregard yamllint syntax error.The yamllint tool reported a syntax error on this line, but this is a false positive. The
{{- if }}statement is valid Helm templating syntax used for conditional rendering of the deployment. No action is required to address this reported error.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
1-124: Overall assessment: Well-implemented cert-controller deployment with minor improvement suggestions.This Helm chart for the cert-controller deployment is well-structured and follows Kubernetes best practices. Key strengths include:
- Flexible configuration options using Helm values.
- Proper use of labels, selectors, and templates for consistency.
- Comprehensive pod scheduling controls (node selector, affinity, tolerations, topology spread).
- Conditional creation based on other components' settings.
Suggested improvements:
- Consider implementing Horizontal Pod Autoscaler for better scalability.
- Enhance container security context with least privilege principles.
- Set a default priority class name for consistent scheduling priority.
These suggestions aim to further improve an already solid deployment configuration. Great job on implementing this crucial component of the external-secrets-operator!
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/core/platform/bundles/paas-full.yaml (1)
220-224: LGTM! Consider verifying chart details and configuration.The addition of the external-secrets-operator release looks good and aligns with the PR objectives. The configuration is consistent with other releases in the file.
To ensure completeness, please verify:
- The chart
cozy-external-secrets-operatorexists and is properly configured.- Whether any additional configuration or values are needed for this release.
You can use the following command to check if the chart exists in your Helm repository:
If additional configuration is needed, consider adding a
valuessection similar to other releases in this file.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 224-224: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/deployment.yaml (4)
1-12: LGTM: Well-structured metadata sectionThe metadata section is well-implemented, using Helm templating functions for flexibility. The inclusion of labels and the conditional annotations is a good practice for Kubernetes resources.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
19-29: LGTM: Flexible and comprehensive pod metadataThe pod template metadata section is well-implemented. It allows for custom annotations and combines chart labels with user-defined pod labels, providing flexibility and maintaining consistency with Kubernetes best practices.
1-1: Note: Ignore yamllint syntax errorThe yamllint tool reported a syntax error on this line, but this is a false positive. The
{{- if .Values.createOperator }}directive is valid Helm templating syntax and not a YAML syntax error. No action is required to address this reported issue.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
1-146: Excellent implementation of the External Secrets Operator deploymentThis Helm chart template for the External Secrets Operator deployment is well-structured, comprehensive, and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. It provides a high degree of flexibility and configurability, allowing for seamless integration with various external secret management services.
Key strengths:
- Conditional creation based on
.Values.createOperator- Extensive use of Helm templating for flexibility
- Comprehensive configuration options for fine-tuned control
- Proper use of Kubernetes best practices (labels, annotations, security contexts)
- Support for advanced Kubernetes features (affinity, tolerations, topology spread)
The implementation successfully addresses the PR's goal of integrating the external-secrets-operator into the main bundles of the project, providing a unified and flexible secret management solution.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/servicemonitor.yaml (3)
1-1: LGTM: Conditional creation of resourcesThe conditional statement at the beginning of the file is a good practice. It ensures that the ServiceMonitor resources are only created when the necessary API is available and when the feature is enabled in the values. This approach provides flexibility and prevents errors in environments where the monitoring API might not be present.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
1-1: Note on YAML linter warningThe YAML linter reported a syntax error on line 1, but this appears to be a false positive. The file starts with a valid Helm conditional statement:
{{- if and ( .Capabilities.APIVersions.Has "monitoring.coreos.com/v1" ) .Values.serviceMonitor.enabled -}}This is correct Helm templating syntax and not a YAML syntax error. You can safely ignore this warning from the YAML linter, as it doesn't understand Helm-specific syntax.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
1-164: Overall: Excellent implementation of monitoring resources for External Secrets OperatorThis Helm chart template for the External Secrets Operator's monitoring resources is well-implemented and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. Key points:
- The file provides Service and ServiceMonitor resources for all main components: metrics, webhook, and cert-controller.
- Conditional creation of resources ensures flexibility and prevents errors in unsupported environments.
- Extensive use of Helm templating allows for easy customization through values.
- The structure is consistent across all sections, making it easy to understand and maintain.
The implementation supports the integration of the external-secrets-operator into the main bundles of the project, as stated in the PR objectives. It facilitates monitoring of the operator's components, which is crucial for maintaining the health and performance of the secret management system.
Great job on this implementation! It provides a solid foundation for monitoring the External Secrets Operator and integrates well with existing monitoring infrastructure.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/gcraccesstoken.yaml (2)
127-138: LGTM! Consider adding TLS configuration for the webhook.The conversion webhook configuration is well-structured and provides flexibility through conditional setup.
[security]
To enhance security, consider adding TLS configuration for the webhook. This ensures encrypted communication between the API server and the webhook. You can add something like:clientConfig: service: name: {{ include "external-secrets.fullname" . }}-webhook namespace: {{ .Release.Namespace | quote }} path: /convert caBundle: ${CA_BUNDLE}Ensure to populate the
CA_BUNDLEduring the Helm chart installation or use cert-manager for automatic TLS certificate management.
1-10: Static analysis hints can be ignored.The static analysis tool has flagged some issues, but they can be safely ignored:
- The syntax error on line 1 is a false positive due to the Helm template directive.
- The indentation warnings on lines 8-10 are also false positives as they are within a Helm template block and follow the correct indentation for the
toYamlfunction.These warnings are common when static analysis tools don't fully understand Helm template syntax.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/webhook.yaml (4)
1-15: LGTM! Good practices in CRD definition.The CRD metadata section is well-structured and follows Kubernetes best practices:
- Conditional creation based on
.Values.installCRDsallows flexibility in installation.- Integration with cert-manager for TLS certificate management is a good security practice.
- Proper naming and labeling conventions are followed.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
16-28: LGTM! CRD spec follows Kubernetes standards.The CRD spec section is well-defined:
- The group name
generators.external-secrets.ioaligns with the external-secrets ecosystem.- Naming conventions for kind, list kind, plural, and singular forms are correctly specified.
- The
Namespacedscope is appropriate for this custom resource.
29-141: LGTM! Comprehensive and well-structured schema definition.The CRD schema is thorough and well-designed:
- It covers all necessary fields for a Webhook resource, including metadata, spec, and various configuration options.
- Required fields (result and url) are correctly specified.
- The secrets section allows for secure handling of sensitive information, which aligns with the PR objective of enhancing secret management capabilities.
- Flexibility in TLS certificate management is provided through caBundle and caProvider options.
- Each field is well-documented with clear descriptions.
1-158: Overall assessment: Excellent implementation of the Webhook CRD for external-secrets-operator.This Custom Resource Definition (CRD) for the Webhook resource is well-structured, comprehensive, and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of integrating the external-secrets-operator. Key strengths include:
- Flexible installation options through conditional creation.
- Integration with cert-manager for enhanced security.
- Well-defined schema with clear documentation for each field.
- Proper handling of sensitive information through the secrets section.
- Support for conversion webhooks, allowing for future API evolution.
The implementation follows Kubernetes best practices and provides a solid foundation for managing external secrets. Great job on this addition to the project!
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/rbac.yaml (5)
116-158: LGTM: View role is well-defined and follows best practices.The view role/cluster role is correctly configured with read-only permissions for external-secrets resources. The use of aggregation to view, edit, and admin roles is a good practice, allowing seamless integration with existing Kubernetes RBAC structures.
159-205: LGTM: Edit role is properly configured.The edit role/cluster role is correctly set up with appropriate permissions for managing external-secrets resources. The aggregation to edit and admin roles is a good practice, ensuring that users with these roles have the necessary permissions to manage external secrets.
206-231: LGTM: Controller role binding is correctly configured.The role binding (or cluster role binding) for the controller is properly set up. It correctly uses conditional logic to create either a RoleBinding or ClusterRoleBinding based on the scoped RBAC settings. The binding is appropriately configured to use the controller role and the correct service account.
232-265: LGTM: Leader election role is well-defined.The leader election role is correctly configured with the necessary permissions to manage ConfigMaps and Leases required for the leader election process. The role is appropriately scoped to the operator's namespace, which is a good security practice.
266-281: LGTM: Leader election role binding is properly set up.The role binding for leader election is correctly configured. It appropriately binds the leader election role to the service account in the operator's namespace. This setup ensures that the operator has the necessary permissions for leader election while maintaining proper scope.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/ecrauthorizationtoken.yaml (3)
16-28: LGTM! Well-structured CRD spec and names section.The CRD specification follows Kubernetes best practices:
- Appropriate API group:
generators.external-secrets.io- Well-defined resource names with plural, singular, and short names
- Correct use of categories for grouping
- Namespaced scope, which is suitable for this resource type
1-10: Note on static analysis warnings: Can be safely ignored.The static analysis tool has flagged some issues, but these can be safely ignored:
- The syntax error on line 1 is a false positive due to the Helm template directive
{{- if .Values.installCRDs }}.- The indentation warnings on lines 8-10 are also false positives. The apparent indentation issues are due to the nature of Helm templates and how they're processed.
These warnings are common when static analysis tools parse Helm templates without context. The actual rendered YAML will have correct syntax and indentation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
1-178: Overall assessment: Well-implemented CRD for ECRAuthorizationToken.This Custom Resource Definition for ECRAuthorizationToken is well-structured and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. It effectively supports the integration of the external-secrets-operator with Amazon ECR, enhancing the project's secret management capabilities. The implementation follows Kubernetes and Helm best practices, providing flexibility and maintainability.
Key strengths:
- Conditional CRD installation for deployment flexibility.
- Comprehensive schema definition with clear documentation.
- Proper versioning and conversion webhook setup.
The minor suggestions provided earlier will further improve readability and robustness. Great job on this implementation!
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/acraccesstoken.yaml (1)
1-204: Excellent implementation of ACRAccessToken CRDThis Custom Resource Definition for ACRAccessToken is well-implemented and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of integrating the external-secrets-operator. It provides a robust and flexible way to manage Azure Container Registry access tokens within Kubernetes.
Key strengths:
- Multiple authentication methods support various Azure setups.
- Detailed schema ensures proper validation and usage.
- Conversion webhook support allows for future versioning.
- Conditional creation provides installation flexibility.
The CRD effectively enhances the project's secret management capabilities, particularly for Azure Container Registry integration. It's well-positioned for future extensions and improvements.
Great work on this implementation!
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/values.yaml (6)
1-13: Global settings look goodThe global configuration provides flexibility for deployment across different environments, including OpenShift compatibility. This aligns well with the PR objective of integrating the external-secrets-operator into various setups.
91-121: LGTM: Service account and RBAC settingsThe service account and RBAC settings are well-configured:
- Service account creation is enabled by default, which is a good security practice.
- RBAC resources are created by default, ensuring proper access control.
- The separate setting for servicebindings provides additional flexibility.
These settings align well with Kubernetes best practices and provide a secure default configuration.
148-162: Excellent security context configurationThe security context settings are well-configured and follow Kubernetes security best practices:
- Pod security context is enabled by default.
- The container security context includes:
- Disabling privilege escalation
- Dropping all capabilities
- Read-only root filesystem
- Running as non-root with a specific user ID
- Using the RuntimeDefault seccomp profile
These settings significantly enhance the security posture of the external-secrets-operator deployment.
525-529: DNS settings look goodThe DNS configuration is appropriately set:
dnsPolicyis set to ClusterFirst, which is the default and suitable for most deployments.dnsConfigis empty, allowing for easy customization if specific DNS settings are required.These settings provide a good balance between sensible defaults and flexibility for custom configurations.
531-532: LGTM: podSpecExtra configurationThe
podSpecExtrafield is correctly left empty by default. This allows users to add any additional pod specifications if needed, providing flexibility for advanced use cases without complicating the default configuration.
1-532: Overall, a well-structured and comprehensive configurationThis
values.yamlfile provides a robust and flexible configuration for the external-secrets-operator, aligning well with the PR objectives. Key points:
- Sensible defaults are provided for most settings, making it easy to get started.
- Security best practices are followed, especially in the security context configurations.
- The file structure is logical and well-organized, making it easy to navigate and customize.
Areas for potential improvement:
- Consider adding more documentation or comments for advanced configurations, especially for production deployments.
- Some default resource limits could be added, particularly for the cert controller.
- Guidance on enabling and configuring monitoring for production use would be beneficial.
These improvements would further enhance the usability and production-readiness of the external-secrets-operator integration.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/pushsecret.yaml (4)
16-25: LGTM! CRD spec and names are well-defined.The CRD specification for the PushSecret resource is correctly defined. The group, names, and scope are all appropriate for this custom resource.
26-370: Excellent schema definition with comprehensive documentation.The CRD schema is well-structured and extensively documented. Key points:
- Detailed descriptions for each field enhance usability.
- The schema follows Kubernetes API conventions.
- Flexible configuration options are provided for the PushSecret resource.
This level of detail will greatly assist users in understanding and utilizing the PushSecret resource.
1-10: Regarding static analysis hintsThe static analysis tool has flagged some issues, but they appear to be false positives:
- The syntax error on line 1 is likely due to the Helm templating syntax, which is valid in this context.
- The indentation warnings on lines 8-10 are part of a nested YAML structure within Helm templating, so the indentation is correct for this use case.
These warnings can be safely ignored as they don't represent actual issues in the code.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
1-388: Excellent implementation of the PushSecret CRDThis file successfully implements the PushSecret Custom Resource Definition as part of the external-secrets-operator integration. Key strengths include:
- Comprehensive schema definition with detailed documentation for each field.
- Flexible configuration options through Helm values.
- Proper versioning and API conventions adherence.
- Inclusion of advanced features like status subresource and conversion webhook.
The implementation aligns well with the PR objectives, providing a robust foundation for managing external secrets in Kubernetes environments. The level of detail and flexibility in this CRD will greatly enhance the project's secret management capabilities.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/README.md (1)
1-9: LGTM: Comprehensive header and introductionThe header and introduction provide essential information about the External Secrets project, including the logo, chart type, and version. The note about the README being generated is helpful for maintainers.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/values.schema.json (2)
1-7: LGTM: Appropriate schema version and top-level structure.The schema uses the latest JSON Schema draft (2020-12), which is good for compatibility and features. The top-level structure as an object with various properties is appropriate for a Helm chart values schema.
1-905: Overall assessment: Comprehensive schema with room for improvementThe
values.schema.jsonfile provides a detailed and extensive schema for configuring the External Secrets Operator Helm chart. It covers all major components and configuration options, which is commendable. However, there are several areas where the schema could be improved:
- Reduce repetition by using shared definitions and
$ref.- Enhance documentation with descriptions and examples.
- Improve structure by breaking down the schema into smaller, more manageable files.
- Implement stricter validation where appropriate.
- Add more contextual information to guide users in configuring the chart correctly.
These improvements would significantly enhance the usability, maintainability, and effectiveness of the schema. Despite these suggestions, the current schema is a solid foundation for validating and documenting the Helm chart's values.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/clusterexternalsecret.yaml (6)
1-15: LGTM! Good use of Helm templating and conditional CRD creation.The CRD definition and metadata are well-structured. The conditional creation based on Helm values (
installCRDsandcreateClusterExternalSecret) provides flexibility during deployment. The use of Helm templating for annotations is a good practice, allowing for customization.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
16-27: LGTM! Well-defined CRD spec and names section.The CRD specification follows Kubernetes best practices. The group name "external-secrets.io" is appropriate, and the resource names (singular, plural, and shortnames) are well-defined. Setting the scope to "Cluster" is correct for a resource that operates across namespaces.
28-648: LGTM! Comprehensive and well-documented schema definition.The schema definition for the ClusterExternalSecret CRD is extensive and well-structured. It provides detailed descriptions for each field, covering various aspects such as data retrieval, refresh intervals, and secret store references. This level of detail enhances usability and helps users understand how to properly configure the resource.
649-653: LGTM! Appropriate versioning and subresource configuration.The CRD version is set to v1beta1, which is served and stored. The status subresource is correctly defined, allowing for proper status updates of the resource.
Consider planning for the eventual transition to v1 when the API becomes more stable.
654-666: LGTM! Well-configured conversion webhook.The conversion webhook configuration is well-structured and conditionally enabled based on Helm values. This provides flexibility during deployment. The use of the Webhook conversion strategy and Helm templating for the service configuration is a good practice.
This setup allows for smoother API version transitions in the future, enhancing the maintainability of the CRD.
1-10: Static analysis hints can be safely ignored.The static analysis tool reported a syntax error on line 1 and indentation warnings for lines 8-10. These can be safely ignored as they are false positives due to the use of Helm templating. The YAML structure is correct when considering the Helm template context.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/externalsecret.yaml (3)
1-15: LGTM: Overall structure and metadata look good.The CRD is properly defined with apiVersion, kind, and metadata. The use of Helm templating for conditional installation and annotations is a good practice for flexibility.
A few observations:
- The CRD is only installed if
.Values.installCRDsis true, which is a good practice for flexibility.- The use of cert-manager annotations for webhook CA injection is conditionally added based on multiple values, which is a good security practice.
- The
controller-gen.kubebuilder.io/versionannotation indicates this CRD was generated using controller-gen, which is a recommended tool for generating CRDs.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
300-807: LGTM: v1beta1 version is well-defined with improvementsThe v1beta1 version of the ExternalSecret CRD is well-structured and includes several improvements:
- Additional printer columns for better kubectl output (lines 300-312).
- New fields like
dataFrom.findanddataFrom.rewritefor enhanced functionality (lines 481-553).- More comprehensive schema definition with detailed descriptions.
These improvements provide better functionality, observability, and user experience compared to the v1alpha1 version.
808-819: LGTM: Conversion webhook configuration looks goodThe conversion webhook configuration is well-structured and includes:
- Conditional inclusion based on
.Values.crds.conversion.enabled(line 808).- Proper specification of conversion strategy and client config (lines 810-818).
- Use of templating for service name and namespace (lines 816-817).
This configuration allows for seamless conversion between CRD versions.
To ensure the webhook is properly set up, please verify:
- The webhook service is deployed correctly.
- Necessary RBAC permissions are in place for the webhook to function.
You can use the following command to check the webhook configuration:
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/crds/vaultdynamicsecret.yaml (10)
1-16: LGTM: CRD definition and metadata look good.The Custom Resource Definition (CRD) for VaultDynamicSecret is well-structured. The use of Helm templating ({{ .Values.installCRDs }}) allows for conditional installation, which is a good practice for flexibility. The metadata includes appropriate annotations and labels.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 9-9: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[warning] 10-10: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
17-27: LGTM: Group, names, and scope are well-defined.The CRD group, names (including plural, singular, and shortNames), and scope are correctly defined. The inclusion of categories is helpful for grouping related resources.
28-51: LGTM: Schema definition starts correctly.The schema definition begins with appropriate fields for apiVersion, kind, and metadata. The use of detailed descriptions for each field is a good practice for documentation.
68-545: LGTM: Authentication methods are comprehensively defined.The CRD includes a wide range of authentication methods for Vault, including AppRole, Cert, IAM, JWT, Kubernetes, LDAP, and UserPass. Each method is well-defined with appropriate properties and descriptions.
546-577: LGTM: CA bundle and provider are well-defined.The caBundle and caProvider fields are correctly defined, allowing for flexible CA certificate management. The use of a ConfigMap or Secret for the CA bundle is a good practice.
585-589: LGTM: Headers field is correctly defined.The headers field allows for custom headers, which is useful for advanced configurations.
590-667: LGTM: Vault configuration fields are well-defined.The namespace, path, readYourWrites, server, tls, and version fields are correctly defined with appropriate descriptions and validations.
668-686: LGTM: ResultType field is well-defined.The resultType field with its enum values (Data and Auth) is correctly defined and documented.
687-695: LGTM: Required fields and subresources are correctly specified.The required fields (path and provider) are specified, and the status subresource is correctly defined.
696-707: LGTM: Conversion webhook is conditionally defined.The conversion webhook configuration is correctly defined and conditionally included based on the .Values.crds.conversion.enabled flag. This allows for flexible deployment options.
packages/system/external-secrets-operator/charts/external-secrets/templates/_helpers.tpl (3)
184-198: Assess the Impact of Omitting Security Context FieldsIn the
external-secrets.renderSecurityContextfunction (lines 184-198), omitting fields likefsGroup,runAsUser, andrunAsGroupwhen adapting for OpenShift might have security implications. Removing these fields could affect permissions and access controls.Review OpenShift documentation to confirm that these fields are managed appropriately by the platform and that their omission does not introduce security risks.
175-177: Verify OpenShift Detection Logic for ReliabilityThe
external-secrets.isOpenShiftfunction (lines 175-177) checks forsecurity.openshift.io/v1in.Capabilities.APIVersionsto detect OpenShift. This method may not be reliable in all cluster configurations.Run the following script to list API versions and confirm the presence of the OpenShift-specific API group:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all API versions to verify OpenShift detection. kubectl api-versions | grep 'security.openshift.io/v1'Ensure that this API group consistently indicates an OpenShift environment.
152-155: Ensure Correct Handling of Image Tags and FlavorsIn the
external-secrets.imagefunction (lines 152-155), the logic for constructing the image reference may lead to unintended results ifimage.tagorimage.flavourare not properly defined. Verify that default values are correctly applied to prevent issues with image names.Run the following script to check the constructed image references:
| images | ||
| hack | ||
| .gitkeep |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Missing Kubernetes Manifest Templates in .helmignore Directory
While Chart.yaml and values.yaml are present in packages/system/external-secrets-operator/, no Kubernetes manifest templates were found in the templates/ directory. Please ensure that all necessary template files are included to complete the Helm chart integration.
- Ensure that the
templates/directory contains all required.yamlmanifest files for the external-secrets-operator.
🔗 Analysis chain
Request for additional context and files
While the .helmignore file is a good start for setting up the external-secrets-operator Helm chart, it appears that we might be missing crucial components for a complete integration. Given that the PR objective is to add the external-secrets-operator to the main bundles, we would expect to see additional files such as:
- A
Chart.yamlfile defining the Helm chart metadata. - One or more
values.yamlfiles for configuring the external-secrets-operator. - Kubernetes manifest templates (e.g., deployment.yaml, service.yaml) for deploying the operator.
Could you please provide these additional files for review? This will allow us to ensure that the external-secrets-operator is being integrated correctly and in line with the project's standards.
Also, it would be helpful to understand:
- How is this operator being configured to connect with the various secret management services mentioned in the PR description (HashiCorp Vault, 1Password, AWS Secrets Manager)?
- Are there any specific security considerations or best practices being implemented in this integration?
- How will this integration impact existing secret management processes in the project?
To help verify the completeness of this PR, you can run the following script:
This script will help us verify the presence of essential Helm chart files and provide an overview of all files in the chart directory.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for expected files in the external-secrets-operator chart directory
echo "Checking for essential Helm chart files..."
cd packages/system/external-secrets-operator
for file in Chart.yaml values.yaml; do
if [ -f "$file" ]; then
echo "✅ $file exists"
else
echo "❌ $file is missing"
fi
done
echo "\nChecking for Kubernetes manifests..."
if ls templates/*.yaml 1> /dev/null 2>&1; then
echo "✅ Kubernetes manifest templates found"
else
echo "❌ No Kubernetes manifest templates found in templates/ directory"
fi
echo "\nListing all files in the chart directory:"
find . -type f
Length of output: 3054
| external-secrets: | ||
| bitwarden-sdk-server: | ||
| enabled: false | ||
| installCRDs: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Disabling Bitwarden SDK server may impact multiple components
Multiple configurations in the codebase reference Bitwarden, including CRDs and other components. Disabling bitwarden-sdk-server.enabled: false might affect these integrations. Please ensure that this change does not disrupt existing functionalities relying on Bitwarden.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Consider clarifying the Bitwarden SDK server configuration.
The configuration for the external-secrets component looks good overall. Disabling the Bitwarden SDK server by default (bitwarden-sdk-server.enabled: false) is fine, especially since Bitwarden wasn't explicitly mentioned in the supported services.
However, it might be helpful to clarify why the Bitwarden SDK server is specifically mentioned and disabled. Could you provide some context on this? If it's not needed, consider removing it for simplicity.
To check if Bitwarden is used elsewhere in the project, you can run:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Bitwarden-related configurations or usage
rg -i 'bitwarden' --type yaml
Length of output: 3277
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 3-3: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
| apiVersion: v2 | |||
| name: cozy-external-secrets-operator | |||
| version: 0.0.0 # Placeholder, the actual version will be automatically set during the build process | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add a newline at the end of the file.
YAML files should end with a newline character. Please add an empty line at the end of this file to comply with YAML best practices and resolve the linter warning.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
apiVersion: v2
name: cozy-external-secrets-operator
version: 0.0.0 # Placeholder, the actual version will be automatically set during the build process
+📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| version: 0.0.0 # Placeholder, the actual version will be automatically set during the build process | |
| apiVersion: v2 | |
| name: cozy-external-secrets-operator | |
| version: 0.0.0 # Placeholder, the actual version will be automatically set during the build process | |
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 3-3: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
| export NAME=external-secrets-operator | ||
| export NAMESPACE=cozy-$(NAME) | ||
|
|
||
| include ../../../scripts/package.mk |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issue: Included package.mk not found or inaccessible.
The Makefile includes ../../../scripts/package.mk, but it does not exist or is not accessible.
- Verify the existence and correct path of
package.mk.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: External makefile inclusion.
Including package.mk is a good practice for sharing common targets or variables across the project.
To ensure the included file exists and is accessible, run the following command:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence and accessibility of the included makefile
if [ -f "../../../scripts/package.mk" ]; then
echo "package.mk exists and is accessible."
head -n 5 "../../../scripts/package.mk"
else
echo "Error: package.mk not found or not accessible."
fi
Length of output: 143
| keywords: | ||
| - kubernetes-external-secrets | ||
| - secrets | ||
| kubeVersion: '>= 1.19.0-0' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider updating the minimum Kubernetes version.
The current kubeVersion specifies compatibility with Kubernetes versions 1.19.0 and above. However, Kubernetes 1.19 is no longer supported. Consider updating the minimum version to a more recent, supported Kubernetes version to ensure security and compatibility.
You could update the kubeVersion field to a more recent version, for example:
kubeVersion: '>= 1.24.0-0'Please verify the minimum supported Kubernetes version for the external-secrets-operator and update accordingly.
| "type": "object" | ||
| }, | ||
| "readinessProbe": { | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "address": { | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| }, | ||
| "port": { | ||
| "type": "integer" | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| "type": "object" | ||
| }, | ||
| "replicaCount": { | ||
| "type": "integer" | ||
| }, | ||
| "resources": { | ||
| "properties": {}, | ||
| "type": "object" | ||
| }, | ||
| "revisionHistoryLimit": { | ||
| "type": "integer" | ||
| }, | ||
| "secretAnnotations": { | ||
| "properties": {}, | ||
| "type": "object" | ||
| }, | ||
| "securityContext": { | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "allowPrivilegeEscalation": { | ||
| "type": "boolean" | ||
| }, | ||
| "capabilities": { | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "drop": { | ||
| "items": { | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| }, | ||
| "type": "array" | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| "type": "object" | ||
| }, | ||
| "enabled": { | ||
| "type": "boolean" | ||
| }, | ||
| "readOnlyRootFilesystem": { | ||
| "type": "boolean" | ||
| }, | ||
| "runAsNonRoot": { | ||
| "type": "boolean" | ||
| }, | ||
| "runAsUser": { | ||
| "type": "integer" | ||
| }, | ||
| "seccompProfile": { | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "type": { | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| "type": "object" | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| "type": "object" | ||
| }, | ||
| "serviceAccount": { | ||
| "properties": { | ||
| "annotations": { | ||
| "properties": {}, | ||
| "type": "object" | ||
| }, | ||
| "automount": { | ||
| "type": "boolean" | ||
| }, | ||
| "create": { | ||
| "type": "boolean" | ||
| }, | ||
| "extraLabels": { | ||
| "properties": {}, | ||
| "type": "object" | ||
| }, | ||
| "name": { | ||
| "type": "string" | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| "type": "object" | ||
| }, | ||
| "tolerations": { | ||
| "type": "array" | ||
| }, | ||
| "topologySpreadConstraints": { | ||
| "type": "array" | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| "type": "object" | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| "type": "object" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve overall structure and documentation of the schema.
The schema is comprehensive and covers a wide range of configuration options for the External Secrets Operator. However, consider the following improvements to enhance its usability and maintainability:
- Add a top-level
descriptionfield to provide an overview of the schema and its purpose. - Include
descriptionfields for each major section and important properties to guide users. - Consider breaking down the schema into smaller, more manageable files for each major component (e.g.,
cert-controller.schema.json,webhook.schema.json) and use$refto combine them. - Add examples for complex configurations using the
exampleskeyword. - Use
$commentfields to provide additional context or explanations where needed. - Consider adding a
definitionssection for common patterns and referencing them throughout the schema to reduce repetition. - Implement stricter validation where possible, using keywords like
required,minItems,maxItems,pattern, etc.
Example structure:
{
"$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
"description": "Configuration schema for External Secrets Operator Helm chart",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"global": { "$ref": "global.schema.json" },
"certController": { "$ref": "cert-controller.schema.json" },
"webhook": { "$ref": "webhook.schema.json" },
// ... other top-level properties
},
"required": ["global", "certController", "webhook"],
"additionalProperties": false
}These improvements would make the schema more user-friendly, easier to maintain, and less prone to configuration errors.
| type: object | ||
| templateFrom: | ||
| items: | ||
| maxProperties: 1 | ||
| minProperties: 1 | ||
| properties: | ||
| configMap: | ||
| properties: | ||
| items: | ||
| items: | ||
| properties: | ||
| key: | ||
| type: string | ||
| required: | ||
| - key | ||
| type: object | ||
| type: array | ||
| name: | ||
| type: string | ||
| required: | ||
| - items | ||
| - name | ||
| type: object | ||
| secret: | ||
| properties: | ||
| items: | ||
| items: | ||
| properties: | ||
| key: | ||
| type: string | ||
| required: | ||
| - key | ||
| type: object | ||
| type: array | ||
| name: | ||
| type: string | ||
| required: | ||
| - items | ||
| - name | ||
| type: object | ||
| type: object | ||
| type: array | ||
| type: | ||
| type: string | ||
| type: object | ||
| type: object | ||
| required: | ||
| - secretStoreRef | ||
| - target | ||
| type: object | ||
| status: | ||
| properties: | ||
| binding: | ||
| description: Binding represents a servicebinding.io Provisioned Service reference to the secret | ||
| properties: | ||
| name: | ||
| default: "" | ||
| description: |- | ||
| Name of the referent. | ||
| This field is effectively required, but due to backwards compatibility is | ||
| allowed to be empty. Instances of this type with an empty value here are | ||
| almost certainly wrong. | ||
| More info: https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/overview/working-with-objects/names/#names | ||
| type: string | ||
| type: object | ||
| x-kubernetes-map-type: atomic | ||
| conditions: | ||
| items: | ||
| properties: | ||
| lastTransitionTime: | ||
| format: date-time | ||
| type: string | ||
| message: | ||
| type: string | ||
| reason: | ||
| type: string | ||
| status: | ||
| type: string | ||
| type: | ||
| type: string | ||
| required: | ||
| - status | ||
| - type | ||
| type: object | ||
| type: array | ||
| refreshTime: | ||
| description: |- | ||
| refreshTime is the time and date the external secret was fetched and | ||
| the target secret updated | ||
| format: date-time | ||
| nullable: true | ||
| type: string | ||
| syncedResourceVersion: | ||
| description: SyncedResourceVersion keeps track of the last synced version | ||
| type: string | ||
| type: object | ||
| type: object | ||
| served: true | ||
| storage: false | ||
| subresources: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding migration guide for deprecated v1alpha1
The v1alpha1 version of the ExternalSecret CRD is marked as deprecated (line 39). While it's good to maintain backwards compatibility, it's important to guide users towards the newer v1beta1 version.
Consider the following actions:
- Add a comment in the CRD explaining the deprecation and pointing to migration documentation.
- Create migration documentation if it doesn't exist already.
- Plan for the removal of v1alpha1 in a future release.
Example comment to add near line 39:
deprecated: true
# This version is deprecated. Please migrate to v1beta1.
# For migration instructions, see: <link-to-migration-doc>| properties: | ||
| controller: | ||
| description: |- | ||
| Used to select the correct ESO controller (think: ingress.ingressClassName) | ||
| The ESO controller is instantiated with a specific controller name and filters VDS based on this property | ||
| type: string | ||
| method: | ||
| description: Vault API method to use (GET/POST/other) | ||
| type: string | ||
| parameters: | ||
| description: Parameters to pass to Vault write (for non-GET methods) | ||
| x-kubernetes-preserve-unknown-fields: true | ||
| path: | ||
| description: Vault path to obtain the dynamic secret from | ||
| type: string | ||
| provider: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding validation for the 'method' field.
The 'method' field is defined without any validation. Consider adding an enum or pattern to restrict it to valid HTTP methods (GET, POST, etc.) to prevent potential misuse.
You could add validation like this:
method:
description: Vault API method to use (GET/POST/other)
type: string
enum: [GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH]| {{- define "external-secrets.labels" -}} | ||
| helm.sh/chart: {{ include "external-secrets.chart" . }} | ||
| {{ include "external-secrets.selectorLabels" . }} | ||
| {{- if .Chart.AppVersion }} | ||
| app.kubernetes.io/version: {{ .Chart.AppVersion | quote }} | ||
| {{- end }} | ||
| app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: {{ .Release.Service }} | ||
| {{- with .Values.commonLabels }} | ||
| {{ toYaml . }} | ||
| {{- end }} | ||
| {{- end }} | ||
|
|
||
| {{- define "external-secrets-webhook.labels" -}} | ||
| helm.sh/chart: {{ include "external-secrets.chart" . }} | ||
| {{ include "external-secrets-webhook.selectorLabels" . }} | ||
| {{- if .Chart.AppVersion }} | ||
| app.kubernetes.io/version: {{ .Chart.AppVersion | quote }} | ||
| {{- end }} | ||
| app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: {{ .Release.Service }} | ||
| {{- with .Values.commonLabels }} | ||
| {{ toYaml . }} | ||
| {{- end }} | ||
| {{- end }} | ||
|
|
||
| {{- define "external-secrets-webhook-metrics.labels" -}} | ||
| {{ include "external-secrets-webhook.selectorLabels" . }} | ||
| app.kubernetes.io/metrics: "webhook" | ||
| {{- with .Values.commonLabels }} | ||
| {{ toYaml . }} | ||
| {{- end }} | ||
| {{- end }} | ||
|
|
||
| {{- define "external-secrets-cert-controller.labels" -}} | ||
| helm.sh/chart: {{ include "external-secrets.chart" . }} | ||
| {{ include "external-secrets-cert-controller.selectorLabels" . }} | ||
| {{- if .Chart.AppVersion }} | ||
| app.kubernetes.io/version: {{ .Chart.AppVersion | quote }} | ||
| {{- end }} | ||
| app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: {{ .Release.Service }} | ||
| {{- with .Values.commonLabels }} | ||
| {{ toYaml . }} | ||
| {{- end }} | ||
| {{- end }} | ||
|
|
||
| {{- define "external-secrets-cert-controller-metrics.labels" -}} | ||
| {{ include "external-secrets-cert-controller.selectorLabels" . }} | ||
| app.kubernetes.io/metrics: "cert-controller" | ||
| {{- with .Values.commonLabels }} | ||
| {{ toYaml . }} | ||
| {{- end }} | ||
| {{- end }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor Duplicate Label Definitions to Enhance Maintainability
The label definitions for the operator, webhook, webhook-metrics, cert-controller, and cert-controller-metrics (lines 47-97) contain significant duplicated code. To improve maintainability and reduce redundancy, consider extracting the common label components into a shared helper template.
Here's how you might refactor the labels:
-
Create a Base Labels Template:
{{- define "external-secrets.baseLabels" -}} helm.sh/chart: {{ include "external-secrets.chart" . }} {{- if .Chart.AppVersion }} app.kubernetes.io/version: {{ .Chart.AppVersion | quote }} {{- end }} app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: {{ .Release.Service }} {{- with .Values.commonLabels }} {{ toYaml . }} {{- end }} {{- end }}
-
Update Specific Label Definitions:
In your specific components, include the base labels and add any component-specific labels.
{{- define "external-secrets.labels" -}} {{ include "external-secrets.baseLabels" . }} {{ include "external-secrets.selectorLabels" . }} {{- end }} {{- define "external-secrets-webhook.labels" -}} {{ include "external-secrets.baseLabels" . }} {{ include "external-secrets-webhook.selectorLabels" . }} {{- end }}
| {{- if typeIs "string" .value }} | ||
| {{- tpl .value .context }} | ||
| {{ else }} | ||
| {{- tpl (.value | toYaml) .context }} | ||
| {{- end }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review the Use of tpl with Non-String Values
In the external-secrets.render function (lines 162-166), applying tpl to YAML-serialized non-string values may lead to unexpected behavior if the values contain templating syntax or complex structures.
Consider modifying the function to handle non-string values without applying tpl, or ensure that the values are safe for rendering.
|
Hi @mrkhachaturov, thank you for contibution this is nice enhancement, could you please clarify your use-case? |
|
Hi @kvaps , Thank you for your feedback and for considering this enhancement. I'm happy to clarify our use case and explain the benefits of using the External Secrets Operator (ESO). Use Case and Rationale: In our deployment, we utilize external secret management services like HashiCorp Vault or 1Password to securely store and manage secrets and credentials. Our goal is to integrate these external services with our Kubernetes cluster to centralize secret management, enhance security, and streamline secret rotation and auditing. How We Use ESO: The External Secrets Operator enables seamless integration between Kubernetes and external secret management systems. Here's how we leverage ESO: Connecting to External Secret Managers: We configure ESO to connect to our external secret management service (e.g., 1Password Connect) using a apiVersion: external-secrets.io/v1beta1
kind: ClusterSecretStore
metadata:
name: production
spec:
provider:
onepassword:
connectHost: https://onepassword-connect.example.net
vaults:
Production: 1
auth:
secretRef:
connectTokenSecretRef:
name: onepassword-token
key: token
namespace: cozy-external-secrets-operatorDefining External Secrets: With ESO connected to our external secret manager, we define ExternalSecret resources within our Git repositories. These resources specify which secrets to fetch and how to project them into Kubernetes secrets. apiVersion: external-secrets.io/v1beta1
kind: ExternalSecret
metadata:
name: confdb-backup
namespace: confluence
spec:
refreshInterval: "15s"
secretStoreRef:
kind: ClusterSecretStore
name: production
target:
creationPolicy: Owner
data:
- secretKey: ACCESS_KEY_ID
remoteRef:
key: Confluence_DB
property: s3_access_key
- secretKey: ACCESS_SECRET_KEY
remoteRef:
key: Confluence_DB
property: s3_secret_key
- secretKey: REGION
remoteRef:
key: Confluence_DB
property: s3_regionSafe Application Bootstrapping: ESO ensures that applications can access the required secrets without exposing sensitive information. Secrets are automatically synced from the external store to Kubernetes, allowing services to consume them securely during startup and operation. Benefits of Using ESO:
Conclusion: Integrating the External Secrets Operator into our deployment brings significant benefits: Security: Enhanced protection of sensitive information by leveraging secure external storage and limiting in-cluster secret exposure. By using ESO, we improve our cluster's security posture and operational efficiency while maintaining flexibility in our choice of secret management solutions. We acknowledge that users can deploy secret management services within Kubernetes if they choose. However, given the variety of available services and individual preferences, we prefer to empower users to select and install the secret management solution that best fits their needs. Many users may opt to run these services outside of the Kubernetes cluster for reasons such as existing infrastructure, compliance requirements, or to maintain separation of concerns. Please let me know if you have any further questions or need additional details. |
|
Got it. So you don't expect deeper integration with existing charts for now, and you're going to use it only for your busines application logic? It seems it might be really useful also as addon for copying secrets from management Kubernetes to tenant Kubernetes clusters. Thank you. I will review this in a while. |
We find the use case relevant where we use CozyStack to build a private cloud. In each tenant, teams can create different ClusterSecrets stores, or we can provide the option to use the ClusterSecrets store from the upper tenant. I am currently working on refining the logic and will send another PR later. |
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
This pull request adds the external-secrets-operator to our main bundles. By integrating the external-secrets-operator, we enable seamless connectivity to external hosted secret management services such as HashiCorp Vault, 1Password, AWS Secrets Manager, and more. Benefits: Unified Secret Management: Allows the application to securely fetch secrets from external providers without hardcoding them into configurations. Flexibility: Supports multiple external secret stores, giving users the freedom to choose their preferred secret management solution. Enhanced Security: Reduces the risk of exposing sensitive information by leveraging established secret management platforms. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced the `external-secrets-operator` for managing external secrets in Kubernetes. - Added a Helm chart for the `external-secrets` application, including configuration options and dependencies. - Implemented a certificate controller within the external-secrets-operator. - **Documentation** - Added README.md with installation instructions and configuration options for the External Secrets Operator. - Included success message and setup instructions in NOTES.txt for the external-secrets deployment. - **Chores** - Created .helmignore to streamline Helm packaging by excluding unnecessary files. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
This pull request adds the external-secrets-operator to our main bundles. By integrating the external-secrets-operator, we enable seamless connectivity to external hosted secret management services such as HashiCorp Vault, 1Password, AWS Secrets Manager, and more.
Benefits:
Unified Secret Management: Allows the application to securely fetch secrets from external providers without hardcoding them into configurations.
Flexibility: Supports multiple external secret stores, giving users the freedom to choose their preferred secret management solution.
Enhanced Security: Reduces the risk of exposing sensitive information by leveraging established secret management platforms.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
external-secrets-operatorfor managing external secrets in Kubernetes.external-secretsapplication, including configuration options and dependencies.Documentation
Chores