Update README.rst #191
Merged
Update README.rst #191
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The comment about "afew is quite young" is from 2012 and no longer accurate. The NEWS.md file seems unused. Only the IRC channel information is still accurate.
The instructions in README.rst duplicated some of the information in the more complete docs, but not enough to really get started using afew. It is better to avoid duplication and refer new users directly to the full documentation. The README.rst installation instructions were slightly more complete and recent, so they were copied to the docs/sources/installation.rst. While at it, fix broken links in the rst markup. Fixes: afewmail/afew/afewmail#23.
flokli
approved these changes
Apr 11, 2018
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This makes the main README.rst a better starting point for new users:
Merging this will close #23, which probably could have been closed already a while ago. The documentation under "docs" was good enough for me to get started.