Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

aiohttp 2.3 release schedule #2250

Closed
asvetlov opened this issue Sep 7, 2017 · 18 comments
Closed

aiohttp 2.3 release schedule #2250

asvetlov opened this issue Sep 7, 2017 · 18 comments
Labels

Comments

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member

asvetlov commented Sep 7, 2017

We have very long list of features implemented in master but not released yet.

towncriyer --draft generates 107 lines.

I've scheduled at least 40 working hours for PRs review and cleaning up all pending issues.

aiohttp committers, please help me.
We have https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/milestone/16 for list of pending issues for 2.3 but the list is not full.
Feel free to add 2.3 milestone for valuable issues without milestone mark.
For other ones please assign 2.4 milestone.

I'd like iterate over all open aiohttp issues and sort them by selecting ones which are required in aiohttp 2.3 from my perspective.

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member Author

asvetlov commented Sep 20, 2017

Showstoppers:

Fill free to add a bullet to the list.

@fafhrd91
Copy link
Member

I'd cleanup PRs, it is not good to hold on PRs

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member Author

Sure, opened PRs are in my priority list tooo

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member Author

'None' in HTTP headers #2183 solved, Server request's state is not cloned. #2284 added.
#2284 is trivial, have anybody a time for making a fix?

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member Author

asvetlov commented Sep 29, 2017

#2262 looks like a non-issue, but I should reread the conversation.
#2171 is going to be finished by #2299

The 2.3 release is coming.
Guys, if you want to merge something into 2.3 -- please hurry up.
At least left a comment here.

@hellysmile
Copy link
Member

Hey, is there any chance to include #2297 into 2.3?

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member Author

Sure. Showstoppers list is updated.

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member Author

asvetlov commented Oct 1, 2017

"Client basic HTTP auth domain mismatch #1699 " is a security issue too

@fafhrd91
Copy link
Member

fafhrd91 commented Oct 5, 2017

#2189

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member Author

asvetlov commented Oct 5, 2017

Good point

@fafhrd91
Copy link
Member

#2311

@pfreixes
Copy link
Contributor

I know that this might be kind of disruptive but could you consider this #2313?

@kxepal
Copy link
Member

kxepal commented Oct 11, 2017

@pfreixes I think #2313 is quite cool, but big feature that will delay release for unknown time. While it's simple to just copy-paste server implemntation, there are a lot of details to think about.

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member Author

I want to release 2.3 next Monday.
We have 3 showstoppers -- all are relative easy and have straightforward solutions.

I'd like to accept #2252 also after some polishing.

@socketpair
Copy link
Contributor

During holidays, maybe I will fix PR about GET + Content-Length:0

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member Author

Unfortunately I didn't make the release today.
Good news: all showstoppers are fixed.
Waiting for CI green, than merge #2331 #2329 #2328 tomorrow and finally release aiohttp 2.3

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member Author

Everything is done, preparing to release

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Oct 28, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a [new issue] for related bugs.
If you feel like there's important points made in this discussion, please include those exceprts into that [new issue].
[new issue]: https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/new

@lock lock bot added the outdated label Oct 28, 2019
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 28, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants