Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Tests on Droplets ran even when tests failed #568

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2024

Conversation

hoh
Copy link
Member

@hoh hoh commented Mar 6, 2024

Solution: Only run integration tests on Droplets if code quality and pytest succeed.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 34.65%. Comparing base (d6025f5) to head (a6df003).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #568   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   34.65%   34.65%           
=======================================
  Files          52       52           
  Lines        4776     4776           
  Branches      558      558           
=======================================
  Hits         1655     1655           
  Misses       3103     3103           
  Partials       18       18           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2024

Failed to retrieve llama text: POST 504:

504 Gateway Time-out


The server didn't respond in time.

Solution: Only run integration tests on Droplets if code quality and pytest succeed.
@hoh hoh force-pushed the hoh-droplet-after-tests branch from d9d879d to a6df003 Compare March 7, 2024 15:12
@hoh hoh requested a review from nesitor March 7, 2024 16:20
Copy link
Member

@nesitor nesitor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe the workflow is going a bit big, and we need to start thinking about how to improve it.

@hoh
Copy link
Member Author

hoh commented Mar 8, 2024

Maybe the workflow is going a bit big, and we need to start thinking about how to improve it.

Agreed, a refactoring would be useful.

@hoh hoh merged commit 1f6b7b8 into main Mar 8, 2024
20 checks passed
@Psycojoker Psycojoker deleted the hoh-droplet-after-tests branch July 24, 2024 15:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants