-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add GeneralizedTime #492
Merged
alex
merged 15 commits into
alex:main
from
trail-of-forks:dm/add-generalized-time-fractional
Nov 3, 2024
Merged
Add GeneralizedTime #492
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c0c2676
Add GeneralizedTimeFractional
DarkaMaul 48cfa03
Fix linting
DarkaMaul f4636be
Apply suggestions from code review
DarkaMaul b5c8036
Add missing import
DarkaMaul c4bc6fe
Exercise precision too high
DarkaMaul bf810c8
Correctly handle fractional values
DarkaMaul 031bfb4
Use more idiomatic Rust
DarkaMaul 8efe577
Merge branch 'main' into dm/add-generalized-time-fractional
DarkaMaul 7685207
Lint
DarkaMaul aad351c
Add CHANGELOG entry
DarkaMaul 5a9b142
README: rephrase change
woodruffw 1ad4676
types: remove old comment
woodruffw 6791f17
use itoa for formatting
woodruffw 9096ea1
make clippy happy
woodruffw dbeb462
Update src/types.rs
woodruffw File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should DateTime just have an optional nanoseconds field?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thoughts here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Whoops, missed this earlier. I don't have a super strong opinion -- I think @DarkaMaul put the nanos on
GeneralizedTime
sinceUTCTime
has no fractional time support at all, so having it on the top-levelDateTime
used by both seems (slightly) off.OTOH having it on
GeneralizedTime
also seems slightly off, since it's now(DateTime, nanos)
. So I'm happy to move if you'd prefer.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Eh, let's get the docs right on the generalized tiem strcut and that'll be good enough. (See my other comment)