fix(specs): numberOfPendingTasks is plural

[kai687]

🧭 What and Why

This PR aims to improve the specs for the listIndicesResponse schema.

Testing the /1/indexes endpoint, I found that numberOfPendingTasks should be plural.

This PR also adds default values for pendingTask (false) and numberOfPendingTasks (0) as both values always seem to be part of the response.

🎟 JIRA Ticket: N/A

Changes included:

• fix name of response parameter numberOfPendingTasks
• Add default values for numberOfPendingTasks and pendingTask
• Make numberOfPendingTasks required for listIndicesResponse
• Make primary and replicas nullable

🧪 Test

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for api-clients-automation ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	5af82af
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/api-clients-automation/deploys/63b45871cb527100093f6703
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1211--api-clients-automation.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

[algolia-bot]

✗ The generated branch has been deleted.

If the PR has been merged, you can check the generated code on the main branch.
You can still access the code generated on main via this commit.

[shortcuts]

Great catch, thanks!

[shortcuts]

If numberOfPendingTasks is always present in the response, should this be marked as a required property?

Yep indeed

Should primary and replicas be marked as nullable with default values of null if they're optional parameters?

As long as they are not required it should be interpreted correctly by the language, but it might make sense in some cases 🤔

I'd say it's worth adding them and see if it changes something to the generation

[shortcuts]

looks great!

[shortcuts]

@kai687 will you try your 2nd question in this PR or can I merge?

[kai687]

@shortcuts sorry, got side-tracked.

[shortcuts]

@shortcuts sorry, got side-tracked.

no problem!

[kai687]

So, I guess making replicas and primary nullable with null as default values broke the code gen.

[shortcuts]

So, I guess making replicas and primary nullable with null as default values broke the code gen.

oops D: yep indeed it looks like

[shortcuts]

Thanks again!