Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency execa to v9.2.0 #3147

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 9, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
execa 9.1.0 -> 9.2.0 age adoption passing confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

sindresorhus/execa (execa)

v9.2.0

Compare Source

This release includes a new set of methods to exchange messages between the current process and a Node.js subprocess, also known as "IPC". This allows passing and returning almost any message type to/from a Node.js subprocess. Also, debugging IPC is now much easier.

Moreover, a new gracefulCancel option has also been added to terminate a subprocess gracefully.

For a deeper dive-in, please check and share the release post!

Thanks @​iiroj for your contribution, @​SimonSiefke and @​adymorz for reporting the bugs fixed in this release, and @​karlhorky for improving the documentation!

Deprecations

  • Passing 'ipc' to the stdio option has been deprecated. It will be removed in the next major release. Instead, the ipc: true option should be used. (#​1056)
- await execa('npm', ['run', 'build'], {stdio: ['pipe', 'pipe', 'pipe', 'ipc']});
+ await execa('npm', ['run', 'build'], {ipc: true});
- import {execaCommand} from 'execa';
+ import {execa} from 'execa';

- await execaCommand('npm run build');
+ await execa`npm run build`;

const taskName = 'build';
- await execaCommand(`npm run ${taskName}`);
+ await execa`npm run ${taskName}`;

const commandArguments = ['run', 'task with space'];
await execa`npm ${commandArguments}`;

If the file and/or multiple arguments are supplied as a single string, parseCommandString(command) can split that string into an array. More info. (#​1054)

- import {execaCommand} from 'execa';
+ import {execa, parseCommandString} from 'execa';

const commandString = 'npm run task';
- await execaCommand(commandString);
+ const commandArray = parseCommandString(commandString); // ['npm', 'run', 'task']
+ await execa`${commandArray}`;

// Or alternatively:
const [file, ...commandArguments] = commandArray;
await execa(file, commandArguments);

Features

Types

Bug fixes


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "after 4pm on friday,before 9am on monday,every weekend" in timezone Europe/Paris, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner June 9, 2024 06:35
@renovate renovate bot requested review from damcou and Fluf22 and removed request for a team June 9, 2024 06:35
@algolia-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

algolia-bot commented Jun 9, 2024

✗ The generated branch has been deleted.

If the PR has been merged, you can check the generated code on the main branch.
You can still access the code generated on main via this commit.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/execa-9.x branch 5 times, most recently from 4caf407 to 16e9009 Compare June 10, 2024 06:40
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request June 10, 2024 07:04 Inactive
@millotp millotp merged commit 718e8d2 into chore/renovateBaseBranch Jun 10, 2024
25 checks passed
@millotp millotp deleted the renovate/execa-9.x branch June 10, 2024 07:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants