Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for opcodes for consensus incentives #270

Closed
uhudo opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 6 comments · Fixed by #342
Closed

Support for opcodes for consensus incentives #270

uhudo opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 6 comments · Fixed by #342
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@uhudo
Copy link

uhudo commented Jul 16, 2024

Problem

Algorand 3.25.0 introduced new AVM opcodes related to consensus incentives.
For related smart contract applications, access to these opcodes is required.

Solution

Expand AcctParamsGet and Global classes with new corresponding methods.

@uhudo uhudo added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 16, 2024
@robdmoore
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @uhudo we're just researching the status of those opcodes since they don't appear in the latest langspec yet, which is what we use to generate the op code support.

@uhudo
Copy link
Author

uhudo commented Oct 9, 2024

Hi @robdmoore, has there been any update on this? Or is there a workaround possible?
Algorand 3.26.0 is now already live and I'd really need access to these new opcodes.

@robdmoore
Copy link
Contributor

Good question! Let me follow up with the team.

@robdmoore
Copy link
Contributor

Team are on it, should land within a few days

@uhudo
Copy link
Author

uhudo commented Oct 30, 2024

Hi @robdmoore, has there been any update on this?

@daniel-makerx daniel-makerx linked a pull request Nov 1, 2024 that will close this issue
@daniel-makerx
Copy link
Contributor

daniel-makerx commented Nov 1, 2024

Hi @uhudo, have a PR in progress for this now, I expect to have it merged next week

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants