Renames ImmutableBuffer
/TextBufferView
to BinaryBuffer
/TextBuffer
#831
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are no logic changes in this PR, only mechanical renaming. It builds on #830.
ImmutableBuffer
got its name because it stood in contrast to the (now removed)IonReader
that mutated its state each time you advanced the cursor. Now that it stands alone, I thinkBinaryBuffer
is more descriptive.Similarly,
TextBufferView
was named that to emphasize that operations returned a new 'view' of the same buffer. However, the name does suggest that there's anotherTextBuffer
that this is a view into.TextBuffer
is (subjectively) less confusing and pairs nicely withBinaryBuffer
.By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.