Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
This pr implements a simple benchmark suite to compare the efficiency of
effectful-core
andpolysemy
.I've implemented the suite with the help of
tasty-bench
. It is a simple benchmarking library that has minimal dependencies and it can be run with a default main using the same cli options as ourtasty
test suite.How to run
If you only want to run a particular benchmark:
Results
The results show that
effectful
is the clear winner, in some cases it is extremely close to the raw version.State
This benchmark adds the first 2 ^ 22 first naturals:
Results:
Output
This benchmark collects the first 2 ^ 21 naturals in a list and adds them.
Results:
Reader (First Order)
Repeats a constant in a list and adds it. The effects based version ask the constant value in each iteration.
Results:
Reader (Higher Order)
Adds the first 2 ^ 21 naturals. The effects based version use
local
(from theReader
) effect to pass down the argument that counts the iterations.Results:
Embed IO
Opens a temporary file and appends a character to it a number of times.
Results: