Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azure_rm_aksagentpool , azure_rm_aksagentpool_info - Ignore the 'node_public_ip_prefix_id' compare when updating aks pool #1668

Merged

Conversation

Fred-sun
Copy link
Collaborator

@Fred-sun Fred-sun commented Aug 9, 2024

SUMMARY

The service does not return this parameter 'node_public_ip_prefix_id', so it is not determined when updating

ISSUE TYPE
  • Bugfix Pull Request
COMPONENT NAME

azure_rm_aksagentpool.py
azure_rm_aksagentpool_info.py

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

@Fred-sun Fred-sun added ready_for_review The PR has been modified and can be reviewed and merged high_priority High priority labels Aug 10, 2024
@Fred-sun
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Fred-sun commented Aug 13, 2024

Re-open it!

@Fred-sun Fred-sun closed this Aug 13, 2024
@Fred-sun Fred-sun reopened this Aug 14, 2024
@xuzhang3 xuzhang3 changed the title Ignore the 'node_public_ip_prefix_id' compare when updating aks pool azure_rm_aksagentpool , azure_rm_aksagentpool_infoIgnore the 'node_public_ip_prefix_id' compare when updating aks pool Aug 15, 2024
@xuzhang3 xuzhang3 changed the title azure_rm_aksagentpool , azure_rm_aksagentpool_infoIgnore the 'node_public_ip_prefix_id' compare when updating aks pool azure_rm_aksagentpool , azure_rm_aksagentpool_info - Ignore the 'node_public_ip_prefix_id' compare when updating aks pool Aug 15, 2024
@xuzhang3 xuzhang3 merged commit 7f0ffdf into ansible-collections:dev Aug 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
high_priority High priority ready_for_review The PR has been modified and can be reviewed and merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants