Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

NetworkPolicy status support - Feature Request #3540

Closed
rikatz opened this issue Mar 29, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

NetworkPolicy status support - Feature Request #3540

rikatz opened this issue Mar 29, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
area/network-policy/api Issues or PRs related to the network policy API. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@rikatz
Copy link

rikatz commented Mar 29, 2022

Describe the problem/challenge you have
Kubernetes v1.24 will start supporting condition status in Network Policy API (alpha and feature gate'd)

It would be great if Antrea supports this field to provide feedback for users whether the Network Policy could be parsed, and if not the reason (lack of feature, some error, etc)

Describe the solution you'd like

  • Update client-go to v1.24 when it's released
  • Provide feedback on the Network Policy parsing as part of the policy status

Anything else you would like to add?
@rikatz rikatz added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Mar 29, 2022
@antoninbas antoninbas added the area/network-policy/api Issues or PRs related to the network policy API. label Mar 29, 2022
This was referenced Apr 5, 2022
Closed
Closed
@antoninbas
Copy link
Contributor

We have upgraded client-go to v0.24, so if someone wants to work on that issue, it should be straightforward

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment, or this will be closed in 90 days

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 16, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Nov 15, 2022
@tnqn tnqn removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 15, 2022
@tnqn tnqn reopened this Nov 15, 2022
@tnqn tnqn added the priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. label Nov 15, 2022
@antoninbas
Copy link
Contributor

I see that the plan is to undo this in upstream K8s: kubernetes/enhancements#2943 (comment)

So we probably do not want to implement this at this time. cc @Dyanngg

@rikatz
Copy link
Author

rikatz commented Jan 5, 2023

Yes that's correct. We are undoing this in upstream.

Thanks @antoninbas

@antoninbas antoninbas added wontfix This will not be worked on and removed priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. labels Jan 5, 2023
@antoninbas antoninbas closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/network-policy/api Issues or PRs related to the network policy API. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@antoninbas @tnqn @rikatz @Dyanngg