Fix NodePortLocal rules being deleted incorrectly due to PodIP recycle #6531
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tnqn
added
kind/bug
tnqn
force-pushed
the
fix-npl
branch
3 times, most recently
from
7ed6c74 to
ca5de89
Compare
luolanzone
previously approved these changes
Jul 18, 2024
| @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ package rules | |||
|
|
|||
| // PodNodePort contains the Node Port, Pod IP, Pod Port and Protocols for NodePortLocal. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| // PodNodePort contains the Node Port, Pod IP, Pod Port and Protocols for NodePortLocal. | |
| // PodNodePort contains the Pod namespaced name, Node Port, Pod IP, Pod Port and Protocol for NodePortLocal. |
or remove the comment? I feel it's self-explanation and no need to add comment for PodNodePort.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Updated, I didn't remove it as a struct's comment may be useful when generating doc or when IDE references the struct.
The NodePortLocal cache bound a Pod's NodePortLocal rules to its Pod IP. However, a Pod IP can be recycled and allocated to another Pod when it runs into succeeded or failed stage, which causes more than one Pod to share a Pod IP. When the terminated Pod was deleted, NodePortLocal controller incorrectly deleted the rules that belong to another Pod because they have the same IP. The patch fixes it by binding the NodePortLocal rules to its Pod key (namespace + name). The podToIP cache is no longer needed as we can clean up rules by Pod key. Signed-off-by: Quan Tian <quan.tian@broadcom.com>
XinShuYang
reviewed
Jul 18, 2024
luolanzone
approved these changes
Jul 18, 2024
|
/test-all |
|
/test-e2e |
tnqn
added a commit
to tnqn/antrea
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2024
antrea-io#6531) The NodePortLocal cache bound a Pod's NodePortLocal rules to its Pod IP. However, a Pod IP can be recycled and allocated to another Pod when it runs into succeeded or failed stage, which causes more than one Pod to share a Pod IP. When the terminated Pod was deleted, NodePortLocal controller incorrectly deleted the rules that belong to another Pod because they have the same IP. The patch fixes it by binding the NodePortLocal rules to its Pod key (namespace + name). The podToIP cache is no longer needed as we can clean up rules by Pod key. Signed-off-by: Quan Tian <quan.tian@broadcom.com>
tnqn
added a commit
to tnqn/antrea
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2024
antrea-io#6531) The NodePortLocal cache bound a Pod's NodePortLocal rules to its Pod IP. However, a Pod IP can be recycled and allocated to another Pod when it runs into succeeded or failed stage, which causes more than one Pod to share a Pod IP. When the terminated Pod was deleted, NodePortLocal controller incorrectly deleted the rules that belong to another Pod because they have the same IP. The patch fixes it by binding the NodePortLocal rules to its Pod key (namespace + name). The podToIP cache is no longer needed as we can clean up rules by Pod key. Signed-off-by: Quan Tian <quan.tian@broadcom.com>
tnqn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2024
#6531) (#6534) The NodePortLocal cache bound a Pod's NodePortLocal rules to its Pod IP. However, a Pod IP can be recycled and allocated to another Pod when it runs into succeeded or failed stage, which causes more than one Pod to share a Pod IP. When the terminated Pod was deleted, NodePortLocal controller incorrectly deleted the rules that belong to another Pod because they have the same IP. The patch fixes it by binding the NodePortLocal rules to its Pod key (namespace + name). The podToIP cache is no longer needed as we can clean up rules by Pod key. Signed-off-by: Quan Tian <quan.tian@broadcom.com>
tnqn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2024
#6531) (#6533) The NodePortLocal cache bound a Pod's NodePortLocal rules to its Pod IP. However, a Pod IP can be recycled and allocated to another Pod when it runs into succeeded or failed stage, which causes more than one Pod to share a Pod IP. When the terminated Pod was deleted, NodePortLocal controller incorrectly deleted the rules that belong to another Pod because they have the same IP. The patch fixes it by binding the NodePortLocal rules to its Pod key (namespace + name). The podToIP cache is no longer needed as we can clean up rules by Pod key. Signed-off-by: Quan Tian <quan.tian@broadcom.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The NodePortLocal cache bound a Pod's NodePortLocal rules to its Pod IP. However, a Pod IP can be recycled and allocated to another Pod when it runs into succeeded or failed stage, which causes more than one Pod to share a Pod IP. When the terminated Pod was deleted, NodePortLocal controller incorrectly deleted the rules that belong to another Pod because they have the same IP.
The patch fixes it by binding the NodePortLocal rules to its Pod key (namespace + name). The podToIP cache is no longer needed as we can clean up rules by Pod key.
Fixes #6527