Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move FSHook/PackageIndexHook/SubprocessHook to standard provider #42506

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member

Moving FSHook, PackageIndexHook, SubprocessHook to standard provider


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member Author

oh few tests are failing, looking at now.

@romsharon98 romsharon98 merged commit 61d1dbb into apache:main Oct 1, 2024
56 checks passed
@gopidesupavan gopidesupavan deleted the standard-provider-hooks branch October 1, 2024 21:02
@gopidesupavan gopidesupavan restored the standard-provider-hooks branch October 2, 2024 09:22
joaopamaral pushed a commit to joaopamaral/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
…che#42506)

* move hooks to standard providers

* fix document build and adding hooks to provider yaml file

* adding fshook tests

* marking as db test

* doc reference update to subprocess hook
ellisms pushed a commit to ellisms/airflow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
…che#42506)

* move hooks to standard providers

* fix document build and adding hooks to provider yaml file

* adding fshook tests

* marking as db test

* doc reference update to subprocess hook
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants