ARROW-10889: [Rust] [Proposal] Add guidelines about usage of unsafe

rust/arrow/README.md

@@ -96,6 +96,85 @@ Arrow uses the following features:
 Other than `simd` all the other features are enabled by default. Disabling `prettyprint` might be necessary in order to
 compile Arrow to the `wasm32-unknown-unknown` WASM target.
 
+## Guidelines in usage of `unsafe`
+
+[`unsafe`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch19-01-unsafe-rust.html) has a high maintenance cost because debugging and testing it is difficult, time consuming, often requires external tools (e.g. `valgrind`), and requires a higher-than-usual attention to details. Undefined behavior is particularly difficult to identify and test, and usage of `unsafe` is the [primary cause of undefined behavior](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/behavior-considered-undefined.html) in a program written in Rust.
+For two real world examples of where `unsafe` has consumed time in the past in this project see [#8545](https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8645) and [8829](https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8829)
+This crate only accepts the usage of `unsafe` code upon careful consideration, and strives to avoid it to the largest possible extent.
+
+### When can `unsafe` be used?
+
+Generally, `unsafe` should only be used when a `safe` counterpart is not available and there is no `safe` way to achieve additional performance in that area. The following is a summary of the current components of the crate that require `unsafe`:
+
+* alloc, dealloc and realloc of buffers along cache lines
+* Interpreting bytes as certain rust types, for access, representation and compute
+* Foreign interfaces (C data interface)
+* Inter-process communication (IPC)
+* SIMD
+* Performance (e.g. omit bounds checks, use of pointers to avoid bound checks)
+
+#### cache-line aligned memory management
+
+The arrow format recommends storing buffers aligned with cache lines, and this crate adopts this behavior.
+However, Rust's global allocator does not allocate memory aligned with cache-lines. As such, many of the low-level operations related to memory management require `unsafe`.
+
+#### Interpreting bytes
+
+The arrow format is specified in bytes (`u8`), which can be logically represented as certain types
+depending on the `DataType`.
+For many operations, such as access, representation, numerical computation and string manipulation,
+it is often necessary to interpret bytes as other physical types (e.g. `i32`).
+
+Usage of `unsafe` for the purpose of interpreting bytes in their corresponding type (according to the arrow specification) is allowed. Specifically, the pointer to the byte slice must be aligned to the type that it intends to represent and the length of the slice is a multiple of the size of the target type of the transmutation.
+
+#### FFI
+
+The arrow format declares an ABI for zero-copy from and to libraries that implement the specification
+(foreign interfaces). In Rust, receiving and sending pointers via FFI requires usage of `unsafe` due to 
+the impossibility of the compiler to derive the invariants (such as lifetime, null pointers, and pointer alignment) from the source code alone as they are part of the FFI contract.
+
+#### IPC
+
+The arrow format declares a IPC protocol, which this crate supports. IPC is equivalent to a FFI in that the rust compiler can't reason about the contract's invariants.
+
+#### SIMD
+
+The API provided by the `packed_simd` library is currently `unsafe`. However, SIMD offers a significant performance improvement over non-SIMD operations.
+
+#### Performance
+
+Some operations are significantly faster when `unsafe` is used.
+
+A common usage of `unsafe` is to offer an API to access the `i`th element of an array (e.g. `UInt32Array`).
+This requires accessing the values buffer e.g. `array.buffers()[0]`, picking the slice 
+`[i * size_of<i32>(), (i + 1) * size_of<i32>()]`, and then transmuting it to `i32`. In safe Rust, 
+this operation requires boundary checks that are detrimental to performance.
+
+Usage of `unsafe` for performance reasons is justified only when all other alternatives have been exhausted and the performance benefits are sufficiently large (e.g. >~10%).
+
+### Considerations when introducing `unsafe`
+
+Usage of `unsafe` in this crate *must*:
+
+* not expose a public API as `safe` when there are necessary invariants for that API to be defined behavior.
+* have code documentation for why `safe` is not used / possible
+* have code documentation about which invariant the user needs to enforce to ensure [soundness](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library), or which 
+* invariant is being preserved.
+* if applicable, use `debug_assert`s to relevant invariants (e.g. bound checks)
+
+Example of code documentation:
+
+```rust
+// JUSTIFICATION
+//  Benefit
+//      Describe the benefit of using unsafe. E.g.
+//      "30% performance degradation if the safe counterpart is used, see bench X."
+//  Soundness
+//      Describe why the code remains sound (according to the definition of rust's unsafe code guidelines). E.g.
+//      "We bounded check these values at initialization and the array is immutable."
+let ... = unsafe { ... };
+```
+
 # Publishing to crates.io
 
 An Arrow committer can publish this crate after an official project release has