Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor: Support nulls in array_replace, avoid a copy #8054

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 9, 2023
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
199 changes: 136 additions & 63 deletions datafusion/physical-expr/src/array_expressions.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1222,119 +1222,144 @@ array_removement_function!(
"Array_remove_all SQL function"
);

fn general_replace(args: &[ArrayRef], arr_n: Vec<i64>) -> Result<ArrayRef> {
let list_array = as_list_array(&args[0])?;
let from_array = &args[1];
let to_array = &args[2];

/// For each element of `list_array[i]`, replaces up to `arr_n[i]` occurences
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In general, having a clear description of what the function does, especially when it is mind bending likegeneral_replace helps a lot. I also find that writing such a description often helps improve the code as well as results in better naming

For example, I struggled to explain how this function worked when it took &[ArrayRef] because then the explanations were in terms fof arg[0], arg[1], and arg[2]. Giving the parameters names made things much clearer

/// of `from_array[i]`, `to_array[i]`.
///
/// The type of each **element** in `list_array` must be the same as the type of
/// `from_array` and `to_array`. This function also handles nested arrays
/// ([`ListArray`] of [`ListArray`]s)
///
/// For example, whn called to replace a list array (where each element is a
alamb marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
/// list of int32s, the second and third argument are int32 arrays, and the
/// fourth argument is the number of occurrences to replace
///
/// ```
/// general_replace(
/// [1, 2, 3, 2], 2, 10, 1 ==> [1, 10, 3, 2] (only the first 2 is replaced)
/// [4, 5, 6, 5], 5, 20, 2 ==> [4, 20, 6, 20] (both 5s are replaced)
/// )
/// ```
///
fn general_replace(
list_array: &ListArray,
from_array: &ArrayRef,
to_array: &ArrayRef,
arr_n: Vec<i64>,
) -> Result<ArrayRef> {
// Build up the offsets for the final output array
let mut offsets: Vec<i32> = vec![0];
let data_type = list_array.value_type();
let mut values = new_empty_array(&data_type);
let mut new_values = vec![];

for (row_index, (arr, n)) in list_array.iter().zip(arr_n.iter()).enumerate() {
// n is the number of elements to replace in this row
for (row_index, (list_array_row, n)) in
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I rename these variables to better explain what they are (rather than arr a shorthand for array which is already overloaded in this function

list_array.iter().zip(arr_n.iter()).enumerate()
{
let last_offset: i32 = offsets
.last()
.copied()
.ok_or_else(|| internal_datafusion_err!("offsets should not be empty"))?;
match arr {
Some(arr) => {
let indices = UInt32Array::from(vec![row_index as u32]);
let from_arr = arrow::compute::take(from_array, &indices, None)?;

let eq_array = match from_arr.data_type() {
// arrow_ord::cmp_eq does not support ListArray, so we need to compare it by loop
match list_array_row {
Some(list_array_row) => {
let indices = UInt32Array::from(vec![row_index as u32]);
let from_array_row = arrow::compute::take(from_array, &indices, None)?;
// Compute all positions in list_row_array (that is itself an
// array) that are equal to `from_array_row`
let eq_array = match from_array_row.data_type() {
// arrow_ord::cmp::eq does not support ListArray, so we need to compare it by loop
DataType::List(_) => {
let from_a = as_list_array(&from_arr)?.value(0);
let list_arr = as_list_array(&arr)?;
// compare each element of the from array
let from_array_row_inner =
as_list_array(&from_array_row)?.value(0);
let list_array_row_inner = as_list_array(&list_array_row)?;

let mut bool_values = vec![];
for arr in list_arr.iter() {
if let Some(a) = arr {
bool_values.push(Some(a.eq(&from_a)));
} else {
return internal_err!(
"Null value is not supported in array_replace"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know why nulls aren't supported -- all of the kernels support them well, and the code is more concise without the special case

);
}
}
BooleanArray::from(bool_values)
list_array_row_inner
.iter()
// compare element by element the current row of list_array
alamb marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
.map(|row| row.map(|row| row.eq(&from_array_row_inner)))
.collect::<BooleanArray>()
}
_ => {
let from_arr = Scalar::new(from_arr);
arrow_ord::cmp::eq(&arr, &from_arr)?
let from_arr = Scalar::new(from_array_row);
arrow_ord::cmp::eq(&list_array_row, &from_arr)?
}
};

// Use MutableArrayData to build the replaced array
let original_data = list_array_row.to_data();
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rather than using a new array with two indexes, I found naming them helped a lot

let to_data = to_array.to_data();
let capacity = Capacities::Array(original_data.len() + to_data.len());

// First array is the original array, second array is the element to replace with.
let arrays = vec![arr, to_array.clone()];
let arrays_data = arrays
.iter()
.map(|a| a.to_data())
.collect::<Vec<ArrayData>>();
let arrays_data = arrays_data.iter().collect::<Vec<&ArrayData>>();

let arrays = arrays
.iter()
.map(|arr| arr.as_ref())
.collect::<Vec<&dyn Array>>();
let capacity = Capacities::Array(arrays.iter().map(|a| a.len()).sum());

let mut mutable =
MutableArrayData::with_capacities(arrays_data, false, capacity);
let mut mutable = MutableArrayData::with_capacities(
vec![&original_data, &to_data],
false,
capacity,
);
let original_idx = 0;
let replace_idx = 1;

let mut counter = 0;
for (i, to_replace) in eq_array.iter().enumerate() {
if let Some(to_replace) = to_replace {
if to_replace {
mutable.extend(1, row_index, row_index + 1);
counter += 1;
if counter == *n {
// extend the rest of the array
mutable.extend(0, i + 1, eq_array.len());
break;
}
} else {
mutable.extend(0, i, i + 1);
if let Some(true) = to_replace {
mutable.extend(replace_idx, row_index, row_index + 1);
counter += 1;
if counter == *n {
// copy original data for any matches past n
mutable.extend(original_idx, i + 1, eq_array.len());
break;
}
} else {
return internal_err!("eq_array should not contain None");
// copy original data for false / null matches
mutable.extend(original_idx, i, i + 1);
}
}

let data = mutable.freeze();
let replaced_array = arrow_array::make_array(data);

let v = arrow::compute::concat(&[&values, &replaced_array])?;
values = v;
offsets.push(last_offset + replaced_array.len() as i32);
new_values.push(replaced_array);
}
None => {
// Null element results in a null row (no new offsets)
offsets.push(last_offset);
}
}
}

let values = if new_values.is_empty() {
new_empty_array(&data_type)
} else {
let new_values: Vec<_> = new_values.iter().map(|a| a.as_ref()).collect();
arrow::compute::concat(&new_values)?
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The old logic called concat for each row, which I think is O(N^2) as it keeps copying the same values over and over again. I changed it to call concat just once

I think it is probably possible to avoid calling concat entirely (use MutableArrayData to build up values directly). We can do that as a follow on PR perhaps.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We used to replace MutableArrayData with ListArray, as it is more straightforward. However, perhaps we can also construct ListArray using MutableArrayData and still maintain readability. Particularly in this case, doing so can enhance performance. We should certainly consider building with MutableArrayData!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, what I was getting at is that the contents of values are each already created using MutableArrayData -- and so I think rather than making many small arrays and then concating them together, the could could just use the same MutableArrayData to build the results directly

};

Ok(Arc::new(ListArray::try_new(
Arc::new(Field::new("item", data_type, true)),
OffsetBuffer::new(offsets.into()),
values,
None,
list_array.nulls().cloned(),
)?))
}

pub fn array_replace(args: &[ArrayRef]) -> Result<ArrayRef> {
general_replace(args, vec![1; args[0].len()])
// replace at most one occurence for each element
let arr_n = vec![1; args[0].len()];
general_replace(as_list_array(&args[0])?, &args[1], &args[2], arr_n)
}

pub fn array_replace_n(args: &[ArrayRef]) -> Result<ArrayRef> {
let arr = as_int64_array(&args[3])?;
let arr_n = arr.values().to_vec();
general_replace(args, arr_n)
// replace the specified number of occurences
let arr_n = as_int64_array(&args[3])?.values().to_vec();
general_replace(as_list_array(&args[0])?, &args[1], &args[2], arr_n)
}

pub fn array_replace_all(args: &[ArrayRef]) -> Result<ArrayRef> {
general_replace(args, vec![i64::MAX; args[0].len()])
// replace all occurences (up to "i64::MAX")
let arr_n = vec![i64::MAX; args[0].len()];
general_replace(as_list_array(&args[0])?, &args[1], &args[2], arr_n)
}

macro_rules! to_string {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1822,6 +1847,8 @@ pub fn string_to_array<T: OffsetSizeTrait>(args: &[ArrayRef]) -> Result<ArrayRef
mod tests {
use super::*;
use arrow::datatypes::Int64Type;
use arrow::util::pretty::pretty_format_columns;
use arrow_array::types::Int32Type;
use datafusion_common::cast::as_uint64_array;

#[test]
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2763,6 +2790,52 @@ mod tests {
);
}

#[test]
fn test_array_replace_with_null() {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since the null cases were not covered, I added new coverage. Maybe this style of test could help as we clean up the other aray functions

Copy link
Contributor

@jayzhan211 jayzhan211 Nov 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer having test in slt file if possible, we can cleanup test in the follow on PR.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

slt is a good idea -- I will move the tests

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done in c6dabcf

// ([3, 1, NULL, 3], 3, 4, 2) => [4, 1, NULL, 4] NULL not matched
// ([3, 1, NULL, 3], NULL, 5, 2) => [3, 1, NULL, 3] NULL not replaced (not eq)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why null is not replaced with 5 => [3, 1, 5, 3]?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems that arrow_ord::cmp::eq([3,1,null,3], null) return [null,null,null,null] which I expect to see [false,false,true,false]

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe it's reasonable for arrow-rs to handle null comparisons

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is because in SQL, NULL = NULL is NOT true like you might expect, but is actually NULL

If we want the NULL = NULL = true behavior, we could use the not_distinct kernel instead: https://docs.rs/arrow/latest/arrow/compute/kernels/cmp/fn.not_distinct.html

Copy link
Contributor

@jayzhan211 jayzhan211 Nov 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is because in SQL, NULL = NULL is NOT true like you might expect, but is actually NULL

If we want the NULL = NULL = true behavior, we could use the not_distinct kernel instead: https://docs.rs/arrow/latest/arrow/compute/kernels/cmp/fn.not_distinct.html

I would prefer having not_distinct here, it can let us replace null value with another, if we use eq here, replace with null value is meaningless, also there is no other DB have the similar function #7072, so I think we can have our own definition of what array_replace do.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, sounds good. I will update this PR

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done in acbffa0

// ([NULL], 3, 2, 1) => NULL
// ([3, 1, 3], 3, NULL, 1) => [NULL, 1 3]
let list_array = ListArray::from_iter_primitive::<Int32Type, _, _>([
Some(vec![Some(3), Some(1), None, Some(3)]),
Some(vec![Some(3), Some(1), None, Some(3)]),
None,
Some(vec![Some(3), Some(1), Some(3)]),
]);

let from = Int32Array::from(vec![Some(3), None, Some(3), Some(3)]);
let to = Int32Array::from(vec![Some(4), Some(5), Some(2), None]);
let n = vec![2, 2, 1, 1];

let expected = ListArray::from_iter_primitive::<Int32Type, _, _>([
Some(vec![Some(4), Some(1), None, Some(4)]),
Some(vec![Some(3), Some(1), None, Some(3)]),
None,
Some(vec![None, Some(1), Some(3)]),
]);

let list_array = Arc::new(list_array) as ArrayRef;
let from = Arc::new(from) as ArrayRef;
let to = Arc::new(to) as ArrayRef;
let expected = Arc::new(expected) as ArrayRef;

let replaced = general_replace(
as_list_array(&list_array).unwrap(),
&from as &ArrayRef,
&to,
n,
)
.unwrap();
assert_eq!(
&replaced,
&expected,
"\n\n{}\n\n{}\n\n{}",
pretty_format_columns("input", &[Arc::new(list_array) as _]).unwrap(),
pretty_format_columns("replaced", &[replaced.clone()]).unwrap(),
pretty_format_columns("expected", &[expected.clone()]).unwrap(),
);
}

#[test]
fn test_nested_array_replace() {
// array_replace(
Expand Down
Loading