-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: support LargeList
in array_dims
#8592
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
@@ -1925,12 +1925,29 @@ pub fn array_length(args: &[ArrayRef]) -> Result<ArrayRef> { | |||
|
|||
/// Array_dims SQL function | |||
pub fn array_dims(args: &[ArrayRef]) -> Result<ArrayRef> { | |||
let list_array = as_list_array(&args[0])?; | |||
let data = match args[0].data_type() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please check args not empty, especially if its pub function
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will address this later in the pull request as other functions may also lack this check.
query ??? | ||
select array_dims(arrow_cast(make_array(1, 2, 3), 'LargeList(Int64)')), array_dims(arrow_cast(make_array([1, 2], [3, 4]), 'LargeList(List(Int64))')), array_dims(arrow_cast(make_array([[[[1], [2]]]]), 'LargeList(List(List(List(List(Int64)))))')); | ||
---- | ||
[3] [2, 2] [1, 1, 1, 2, 1] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks great @Weijun-H please address a minor comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm thanks @Weijun-H
Which issue does this PR close?
Parts #8185
Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?