fix #3960

[IanCao]

What is the purpose of the change

Merge rpc-native-thrift-for-apache-dubbo into incubator-dubbo #3960

Verifying this change

1. add dubbo-rpc-native-thrift into dubbo-all/pom.xml
2. add dubbo-rpc-native-thrift into dubbo-bom/pom.xml
3. add libthrift_version, javax_annotation_api_version, junit_version into dubbo-dependency-pom/pom.xml
4. add dubbo-rpc-native-thrift into dubbo-distribution/pom.xml
5. and merge https://github.com/dubbo/rpc-native-thrift-for-apache-dubbo into this module.
6. i have checked all test cases passed.

Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

• Make sure there is a GITHUB_issue field for the change (usually before you start working on it). Trivial changes like typos do not require a GITHUB issue. Your pull request should address just this issue, without pulling in other changes - one PR resolves one issue.
• Format the pull request title like [Dubbo-XXX] Fix UnknownException when host config not exist #XXX. Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line and body.
• Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
• Write necessary unit-test to verify your logic correction, more mock a little better when cross module dependency exist. If the new feature or significant change is committed, please remember to add integration-test in test module.
• Run mvn clean install -DskipTests=false & mvn clean test-compile failsafe:integration-test to make sure unit-test and integration-test pass.
• If this contribution is large, please follow the Software Donation Guide.

[chickenlj]

Junit 4 is not necessary.
Junit 5 is included in the parent pom and it can be used directly inside the new module without any extra declaration.

[IanCao]

ok. i'll changed

[chickenlj]

Why do we need this declaration? I don't find the place where it was referenced.

[IanCao]

yes. i'll remove..i'm just merge this from rpc-native-thrift-for-apache-dubbo to here. it's my fault.btw i find the thirft version of rpc-native-thrift and rpc-thrift is not same. should i make it same or declare 0.11 just in rpc-native-thrift module ??

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #3965 into master will decrease coverage by 0.2%.
The diff coverage is 72.83%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3965      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     63.97%   63.76%   -0.21%     
+ Complexity       98       71      -27     
============================================
  Files           715      744      +29     
  Lines         31493    32206     +713     
  Branches       5074     5124      +50     
============================================
+ Hits          20147    20536     +389     
- Misses         9048     9322     +274     
- Partials       2298     2348      +50

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...ubbo/rpc/protocol/nativethrift/ThriftProtocol.java	72.83% <72.83%> (ø)	0 <0> (?)
.../apache/dubbo/qos/protocol/QosProtocolWrapper.java	64.1% <0%> (-17.95%)	0% <0%> (ø)
.../remoting/transport/netty4/NettyServerHandler.java	61.9% <0%> (-9.53%)	0% <0%> (ø)
.../apache/dubbo/remoting/transport/AbstractPeer.java	65.21% <0%> (-8.7%)	0% <0%> (ø)
...ng/transport/dispatcher/all/AllChannelHandler.java	51.42% <0%> (-5.72%)	0% <0%> (ø)
.../org/apache/dubbo/remoting/ExecutionException.java	15.78% <0%> (-5.27%)	0% <0%> (ø)
.../dubbo/remoting/transport/netty4/NettyChannel.java	61.17% <0%> (-4.71%)	0% <0%> (ø)
.../apache/dubbo/remoting/transport/CodecSupport.java	77.77% <0%> (-3%)	0% <0%> (ø)
...pache/dubbo/registry/support/AbstractRegistry.java	80.07% <0%> (-2.69%)	0% <0%> (ø)
...exchange/support/header/HeaderExchangeHandler.java	59.84% <0%> (-2.37%)	0% <0%> (ø)
... and 59 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 78c7509...22f17ad. Read the comment docs.

[beiwei30]

sorry about it. just noticed you had a pull request for the same issue after I merged #3977 from @Leishunyu.

[beiwei30]

pls. improve #3977 if you see any inappropriate.