[ISSUE#4510] Add test case for SpringSinkConnector.

[yanrongzhen]

Fixes #4510 .

Modifications

• Add test case for SpringSinkConnector.
• Use the Version Catalog mechanism for hamcrest versioning.

[harshithasudhakar]

LGTM, but can we have a more descriptive method name? Like shouldProcessRecordsInQueue? This would make the test's purpose clearer. Additionally, can we consider adding another test case to handle an empty queue? Testing for this scenario is important to ensure the connector's behavior when the queue is empty is as expected. Including edge cases empty queue, can help improve code coverage in test suite.

[pandaapo]

Isn't it more convenient to use JUnit 5's Assertions directly? Why did you deliberately introduce 'hamcrest' to make assertions?

---

直接使用JUnit 5的Assertions不是更方便吗？为何特意引入'hamcrest'来断言？

[yanrongzhen]

Hamcrest's assertion is more powerful than junit5, and I think can be combined.

---

hamcrest的断言比junit5更强大, 我认为两者可以组合使用。

[pandaapo]

But your test case does not require more powerful features in 'hamcrest' than 'JUnit'. Shouldn't it be used on demand?

---

但是你的测试用例并不需要'hamcrest'比'JUnit'更强大的特性啊。不应该按需使用吗？

[harshithasudhakar]

Hamcrest is an additional dependency, and if we're using it solely for simple assertions, I believe that standard JUnit assertions should suffice. This can help us keep our project dependencies minimal and reduce complexity in our tests. This is just my opinion.

[yanrongzhen]

I also think it's right to keep minimal dependencies, it has been fixed in new commit.

[yanrongzhen]

LGTM, but can we have a more descriptive method name? Like shouldProcessRecordsInQueue? This would make the test's purpose clearer. Additionally, can we consider adding another test case to handle an empty queue? Testing for this scenario is important to ensure the connector's behavior when the queue is empty is as expected. Including edge cases empty queue, can help improve code coverage in test suite.

The name of the unit test method has been changed, but about the unit test when the queue is empty, the original class does not have a special case, so i think it does not need to be handle with.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #4511 (97ef124) into master (cf16cf6) will increase coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 97ef124 differs from pull request most recent head e009a26. Consider uploading reports for the commit e009a26 to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #4511      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     15.92%   15.97%   +0.05%     
- Complexity     1541     1549       +8     
============================================
  Files           727      727              
  Lines         28872    28872              
  Branches       2744     2744              
============================================
+ Hits           4597     4613      +16     
+ Misses        23792    23776      -16     
  Partials        483      483              

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[Pil0tXia]

LGTM