-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 251
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KNOX-3039 Add error message sanitization to GatewayServlet #914
Open
kardolus
wants to merge
7
commits into
apache:master
Choose a base branch
from
kardolus:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+217
−11
Open
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b029eff
KNOX-3039 Add error message sanitization to GatewayServlet
kardolus 0f5f6cd
Touch up
kardolus 13cca6e
Log original error message
kardolus 4d4687a
Return instead of throw
kardolus e11912a
Make the pattern configurable
kardolus d9df195
Refactor exception handling to use SanitizedException in GatewayServlet
kardolus 3253622
Add Apache license
kardolus File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions
9
gateway-server/src/main/java/org/apache/knox/gateway/SanitizedException.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
package org.apache.knox.gateway; | ||
kardolus marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
import javax.servlet.ServletException; | ||
|
||
public class SanitizedException extends ServletException { | ||
public SanitizedException(String message) { | ||
super(message); | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
131 changes: 131 additions & 0 deletions
131
gateway-server/src/test/java/org/apache/knox/gateway/GatewayServletTest.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ | ||
/* | ||
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one | ||
* or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file | ||
* distributed with this work for additional information | ||
* regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file | ||
* to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the | ||
* "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance | ||
* with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
* | ||
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
* | ||
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
* limitations under the License. | ||
*/ | ||
package org.apache.knox.gateway; | ||
|
||
import org.apache.knox.gateway.config.GatewayConfig; | ||
import org.easymock.EasyMock; | ||
import org.easymock.IMocksControl; | ||
import org.junit.Before; | ||
import org.junit.Test; | ||
import org.junit.runner.RunWith; | ||
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized; | ||
|
||
import javax.servlet.FilterConfig; | ||
import javax.servlet.ServletConfig; | ||
import javax.servlet.ServletContext; | ||
import javax.servlet.ServletException; | ||
import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest; | ||
import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse; | ||
import java.io.IOException; | ||
import java.util.Arrays; | ||
import java.util.Collection; | ||
|
||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals; | ||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull; | ||
|
||
@RunWith(Parameterized.class) | ||
public class GatewayServletTest { | ||
|
||
private static final String IP_ADDRESS_PATTERN = "\\b(?:\\d{1,3}\\.){3}\\d{1,3}\\b"; | ||
private static final String EMAIL_ADDRESS_PATTERN = "\\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\\.[A-Z|a-z]{2,}\\b"; | ||
private static final String CREDIT_CARD_PATTERN = "\\b\\d{4}-\\d{4}-\\d{4}-\\d{4}\\b"; | ||
|
||
@Parameterized.Parameters(name = "{index}: SanitizationEnabled={2}, Pattern={3}, Exception={0}, ExpectedMessage={1}") | ||
public static Collection<Object[]> data() { | ||
return Arrays.asList(new Object[][] { | ||
{ new IOException("Connection to 192.168.1.1 failed"), "Connection to [hidden] failed", true, IP_ADDRESS_PATTERN }, | ||
{ new RuntimeException("Connection to 192.168.1.1 failed"), "Connection to [hidden] failed", true, IP_ADDRESS_PATTERN }, | ||
{ new NullPointerException(), null, true, IP_ADDRESS_PATTERN }, | ||
{ new IOException("General failure"), "General failure", true, IP_ADDRESS_PATTERN }, | ||
{ new IOException("Connection to 192.168.1.1 failed"), "Connection to 192.168.1.1 failed", false, IP_ADDRESS_PATTERN }, | ||
{ new RuntimeException("Connection to 192.168.1.1 failed"), "Connection to 192.168.1.1 failed", false, IP_ADDRESS_PATTERN }, | ||
{ new NullPointerException(), null, false, IP_ADDRESS_PATTERN }, | ||
{ new IOException("General failure"), "General failure", false, IP_ADDRESS_PATTERN }, | ||
{ new IOException("User email: user@example.com"), "User email: [hidden]", true, EMAIL_ADDRESS_PATTERN }, | ||
{ new RuntimeException("Credit card number: 1234-5678-9101-1121"), "Credit card number: [hidden]", true, CREDIT_CARD_PATTERN }, | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
|
||
private final Exception exception; | ||
private final String expectedMessage; | ||
private final boolean isSanitizationEnabled; | ||
private final String sanitizationPattern; | ||
|
||
public GatewayServletTest(Exception exception, String expectedMessage, boolean isSanitizationEnabled, String sanitizationPattern) { | ||
this.exception = exception; | ||
this.expectedMessage = expectedMessage; | ||
this.isSanitizationEnabled = isSanitizationEnabled; | ||
this.sanitizationPattern = sanitizationPattern; | ||
} | ||
|
||
private IMocksControl mockControl; | ||
private ServletConfig servletConfig; | ||
private ServletContext servletContext; | ||
private GatewayConfig gatewayConfig; | ||
private HttpServletRequest request; | ||
private HttpServletResponse response; | ||
private GatewayFilter filter; | ||
|
||
@Before | ||
public void setUp() throws ServletException { | ||
mockControl = EasyMock.createControl(); | ||
servletConfig = mockControl.createMock(ServletConfig.class); | ||
servletContext = mockControl.createMock(ServletContext.class); | ||
gatewayConfig = mockControl.createMock(GatewayConfig.class); | ||
request = mockControl.createMock(HttpServletRequest.class); | ||
response = mockControl.createMock(HttpServletResponse.class); | ||
filter = mockControl.createMock(GatewayFilter.class); | ||
|
||
EasyMock.expect(servletConfig.getServletName()).andStubReturn("default"); | ||
EasyMock.expect(servletConfig.getServletContext()).andStubReturn(servletContext); | ||
EasyMock.expect(servletContext.getAttribute("org.apache.knox.gateway.config")).andStubReturn(gatewayConfig); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void testExceptionSanitization() throws ServletException, IOException { | ||
GatewayServlet servlet = initializeServletWithSanitization(isSanitizationEnabled, sanitizationPattern); | ||
|
||
try { | ||
servlet.service(request, response); | ||
} catch (Exception e) { | ||
if (expectedMessage != null) { | ||
assertEquals(expectedMessage, e.getMessage()); | ||
} else { | ||
assertNull(e.getMessage()); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
mockControl.verify(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
private GatewayServlet initializeServletWithSanitization(boolean isErrorMessageSanitizationEnabled, String sanitizationPattern) throws ServletException, IOException { | ||
EasyMock.expect(gatewayConfig.isErrorMessageSanitizationEnabled()).andStubReturn(isErrorMessageSanitizationEnabled); | ||
EasyMock.expect(gatewayConfig.getErrorMessageSanitizationPattern()).andStubReturn(sanitizationPattern); | ||
|
||
filter.init(EasyMock.anyObject(FilterConfig.class)); | ||
EasyMock.expectLastCall().once(); | ||
filter.doFilter(EasyMock.eq(request), EasyMock.eq(response), EasyMock.isNull()); | ||
EasyMock.expectLastCall().andThrow(exception).once(); | ||
|
||
mockControl.replay(); | ||
|
||
GatewayServlet servlet = new GatewayServlet(filter); | ||
servlet.init(servletConfig); | ||
return servlet; | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not perform the message sanitization in the SanitizationException class?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pzampino There are some downsides in moving the logic over to the
SanitizationException
class. It makes the code less flexible and potentially harder to maintain (e.g. what if other classes want to throw aSanitizedException
but with different logic?). It's also a bit of an effort to refactor the tests. We haven't decided yet that this pattern is better than keeping the originalException
type (see my previous comment). Finally, but less important IMO, moving the logic over toSanitizedException
can be seen as a violation of the Single Responsibility Principle.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure I agree about the Single Responsibility Principle. What is the responsibility of the SanitizationException if not to provide a sanitized the message? Otherwise, the burden of message sanitization is on all entities that throw it, AND there is no guarantee that a thrower will have sanitized the message.
If there is a need to customize the sanitization, IMO that is what extensions are for. Nothing would prevent the subsequent creation of classes that extends SanitizationException to override the sanitizing logic.
Personally, I don't think level of effort for refactoring counts for much in these types of decisions, especially refactoring of test code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pzampino Yeah, I am bummed that I didn't receive any feedback on the tests. This class had none until I wrote some. Refactoring could mean I need tests on both classes, and since we didn't discuss whether this new pattern is actually better than the old one, it seems like wasted work. Feel free to commit a patch if you can. I am going to be a bit busy with some other work over the next couple of weeks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pzampino The Single Responsibility Principle would be violated because it would make the SanitizedException class responsible for both defining an exception and performing sanitization logic, thus giving it more than one reason to change.