-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 499
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: Implement RFC-3911 Deleter API #5392
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <github@xuanwo.io>
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <github@xuanwo.io>
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <github@xuanwo.io>
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <github@xuanwo.io>
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <github@xuanwo.io>
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <github@xuanwo.io>
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #5392 will degrade performances by 21.37%Comparing Summary
Benchmarks breakdown
|
NOTEs to reviewer:
|
core/src/types/operator/operator.rs
Outdated
Ok(()) | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Delete an infallible iterator of paths. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fallible?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I only reviewed the core part (under oio
) and not any of the services or layers. I trust you on that.
Thank you @George-Miao for the review! |
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo github@xuanwo.io
Which issue does this PR close?
A big part of #3922
Rationale for this change
Implement RFC.
What changes are included in this PR?
This PR implements all needed things to unblock further development.
Are there any user-facing changes?
Enable users to remove a large stream of files.