Improve Adaptive Server Selection to penalize servers returning server side exceptions

[kiruphabalu]

• Currently if server response has exceptions they are not considered and the latency is set to time taken to receive response. This potentially ranks servers with underlying issues better. So the algorithm would prefer these servers.
• With this change, the response from server is parsed and if there are server side exceptions the latency of the server is set to max as timeout ms. This will rank the server lower than healthy servers.

Unit test cases

• Response with no exception will have latency set to response time
• Response with client exceptions will have latency set to response time
• Response with at least one server exception will have latency set to timeout ms

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 84.61538% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 65.04%. Comparing base (59551e4) to head (339afd1).
Report is 1064 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...pache/pinot/core/transport/AsyncQueryResponse.java	84.61%	0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #14029      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     61.75%   65.04%   +3.29%     
- Complexity      207     1534    +1327     
============================================
  Files          2436     2564     +128     
  Lines        133233   140753    +7520     
  Branches      20636    21608     +972     
============================================
+ Hits          82274    91555    +9281     
+ Misses        44911    42456    -2455     
- Partials       6048     6742     +694     

Flag	Coverage Δ
custom-integration1	100.00% <ø> (+99.99%)	⬆️
integration	100.00% <ø> (+99.99%)	⬆️
integration1	100.00% <ø> (+99.99%)	⬆️
integration2	0.00% <ø> (ø)
java-11	64.99% <84.61%> (+3.28%)	⬆️
java-21	64.93% <84.61%> (+3.30%)	⬆️
skip-bytebuffers-false	65.01% <84.61%> (+3.26%)	⬆️
skip-bytebuffers-true	64.91% <84.61%> (+37.18%)	⬆️
temurin	65.04% <84.61%> (+3.29%)	⬆️
unittests	65.04% <84.61%> (+3.29%)	⬆️
unittests1	56.53% <84.61%> (+9.64%)	⬆️
unittests2	35.02% <0.00%> (+7.29%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.