[fix][test] fix flaky test shouldProvideConsistentAnswerToTopicLookupsUsingAdminApi

[liangyepianzhou]

Fixes #22239

Motivation

The test shouldProvideConsistentAnswerToTopicLookupsUsingAdminApi failed too many times in the GitHub CI because of too many topics and too little runtime.
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/actions/runs/8245776074/job/22550815658?pr=22034
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/actions/runs/8234998047/job/22547427391?pr=22243

org.apache.pulsar.broker.loadbalance.AdvertisedListenersMultiBrokerLeaderElectionTest.shouldProvideConsistentAnswerToTopicLookupsUsingAdminApi  Time elapsed: 60.005 s  <<< FAILURE!
  org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method org.apache.pulsar.broker.loadbalance.MultiBrokerLeaderElectionTest.shouldProvideConsistentAnswerToTopicLookupsUsingAdminApi() didn't finish within the time-out 60000
  	at java.base@17.0.10/jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
  	at java.base@17.0.10/java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:211)
  	at java.base@17.0.10/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.awaitDone(FutureTask.java:447)
  	at java.base@17.0.10/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:190)
  	at 

Modifications

Increase the runtime of the shouldProvideConsistentAnswerToTopicLookupsUsingAdminApi

Verifying this change

• Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

• Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
• Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If the box was checked, please highlight the changes

• Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
• The public API
• The schema
• The default values of configurations
• The threading model
• The binary protocol
• The REST endpoints
• The admin CLI options
• The metrics
• Anything that affects deployment

Documentation

• doc
• doc-required
• doc-not-needed
• doc-complete

Matching PR in forked repository

PR in forked repository:

[lhotari]

btw. there's issue #22239 for tracking this.

The test shouldProvideConsistentAnswerToTopicLookupsUsingAdminApi failed too many times in the GitHub CI because of too many topics and too little runtime.

That's true, but why is it so slow is something to address. I've already investigated this and Mockito seems to be part of the story.

[lhotari]

I'm wondering if it's the switch to Corretto in CI (#22238) which is making things more flaky. It could also be a real production code issue. We can merge this in the meantime.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.59%. Comparing base (bbc6224) to head (af9e59f).
Report is 40 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #22249      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     73.57%   73.59%   +0.02%     
- Complexity    32624    32738     +114     
============================================
  Files          1877     1879       +2     
  Lines        139502   139791     +289     
  Branches      15299    15335      +36     
============================================
+ Hits         102638   102883     +245     
- Misses        28908    28912       +4     
- Partials       7956     7996      +40     

Flag	Coverage Δ
inttests	26.80% <ø> (+2.22%)	⬆️
systests	24.39% <ø> (+0.07%)	⬆️
unittests	72.86% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 94 files with indirect coverage changes