[fix] Upgrade jose4j to 0.9.4

[merlimat]

Motivation

Pin Jose4j library lib to latest version. This is a dependency of K8S Java client API.
org.bitbucket.b_c:jose4j:jar:0.9.4:compile which has a fix for:

┌──────────────────────────────────────┬────────────────┬──────────┬────────┬───────────────────┬───────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│               Library                │ Vulnerability  │ Severity │ Status │ Installed Version │ Fixed Version │                            Title                            │
├──────────────────────────────────────┼────────────────┼──────────┼────────┼───────────────────┼───────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ org.bitbucket.b_c:jose4j             │ CVE-2023-51775 │ MEDIUM   │ fixed  │ 0.9.3             │ 0.9.4         │ jose4j: denial of service (CPU consumption) via a large p2c │
│ (org.bitbucket.b_c-jose4j-0.9.3.jar) │                │          │        │                   │               │ (aka PBES2...                                               │
│                                      │                │          │        │                   │               │ https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2023-51775                  │
└──────────────────────────────────────┴────────────────┴──────────┴────────┴───────────────────┴───────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Modifications

Verifying this change

• Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

• Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
• Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If the box was checked, please highlight the changes

• Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
• The public API
• The schema
• The default values of configurations
• The threading model
• The binary protocol
• The REST endpoints
• The admin CLI options
• The metrics
• Anything that affects deployment

Documentation

• doc
• doc-required
• doc-not-needed
• doc-complete

Matching PR in forked repository

PR in forked repository:

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.62%. Comparing base (bbc6224) to head (8ee7983).
Report is 54 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #22273      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     73.57%   73.62%   +0.04%     
- Complexity    32624    32722      +98     
============================================
  Files          1877     1887      +10     
  Lines        139502   139391     -111     
  Branches      15299    15287      -12     
============================================
- Hits         102638   102620      -18     
+ Misses        28908    28828      -80     
+ Partials       7956     7943      -13     

Flag	Coverage Δ
inttests	26.97% <ø> (+2.39%)	⬆️
systests	24.40% <ø> (+0.08%)	⬆️
unittests	72.88% <ø> (+0.04%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 104 files with indirect coverage changes

[lhotari]

LGTM