Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MockZooKeeper shouldn't 'execute' while holding lock #7130

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2020

Conversation

merlimat
Copy link
Contributor

@merlimat merlimat commented Jun 1, 2020

Motivation

There was one particular bad code path where MockZooKeeper#delete
acquires the state mutex, submits to the executor and then releases
the lock. Normally this would be fine. However, MockZooKeeper is often
constructed with a direct executor. This means that the lock is still
held by the delete when it's acquired in the executed code block. So
even if we release before calling callbacks, the lock will still be
held until the end of the #delete() call.

There was one particular bad code path where MockZooKeeper#delete
acquires the state mutex, submits to the executor and then releases
the lock. Normally this would be fine. However, MockZooKeeper is often
constructed with a direct executor. This means that the lock is still
held by the delete when it's acquired in the executed code block. So
even if we release before calling callbacks, the lock will still be
held until the end of the #delete() call.
@sijie sijie merged commit 14873d3 into apache:master Jun 1, 2020
@merlimat merlimat deleted the pr-534da197db branch June 2, 2020 00:01
Huanli-Meng pushed a commit to Huanli-Meng/pulsar that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2020
There was one particular bad code path where MockZooKeeper#delete
acquires the state mutex, submits to the executor and then releases
the lock. Normally this would be fine. However, MockZooKeeper is often
constructed with a direct executor. This means that the lock is still
held by the delete when it's acquired in the executed code block. So
even if we release before calling callbacks, the lock will still be
held until the end of the #delete() call.

Co-authored-by: Ivan Kelly <ikelly@splunk.com>
huangdx0726 pushed a commit to huangdx0726/pulsar that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2020
There was one particular bad code path where MockZooKeeper#delete
acquires the state mutex, submits to the executor and then releases
the lock. Normally this would be fine. However, MockZooKeeper is often
constructed with a direct executor. This means that the lock is still
held by the delete when it's acquired in the executed code block. So
even if we release before calling callbacks, the lock will still be
held until the end of the #delete() call.

Co-authored-by: Ivan Kelly <ikelly@splunk.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants