Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #8460] Improve the pop revive process when reading biz messages from a remote broker #8475

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 2, 2024

Conversation

imzs
Copy link
Contributor

@imzs imzs commented Jul 31, 2024

Enhancement #8460

  1. provide extra information to the call chain of remote message reading
  2. an exponential backoff and ending condition of CK rewrite

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 70.73171% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 46.59%. Comparing base (263f0fb) to head (603d361).
Report is 5 commits behind head on develop.

Files Patch % Lines
...a/org/apache/rocketmq/store/pop/PopCheckPoint.java 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
...he/rocketmq/broker/processor/PopReviveService.java 81.25% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
.../apache/rocketmq/broker/failover/EscapeBridge.java 92.30% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #8475      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      45.91%   46.59%   +0.68%     
- Complexity     11101    11431     +330     
=============================================
  Files           1274     1274              
  Lines          89002    89823     +821     
  Branches       11441    11560     +119     
=============================================
+ Hits           40863    41856     +993     
+ Misses         43031    42844     -187     
- Partials        5108     5123      +15     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants