Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-49883][SS] State Store Checkpoint Structure V2 Integration with RocksDB and RocksDBFileManager #48355
[SPARK-49883][SS] State Store Checkpoint Structure V2 Integration with RocksDB and RocksDBFileManager #48355
Changes from all commits
8eb89f4
1c27324
caf19dc
2609cd2
ca2e5d7
f7b4a29
e2bd070
59bda44
f563b26
a104ba9
8d0537d
d3f3201
3cc3c1f
f2f6059
3768855
073ebf1
30a19b1
8b2b7f7
cb16a31
fecd88e
1aaaba5
af20cdf
cdebd16
97c8356
e9dfe25
09f540c
0d32561
8e439fc
3f7c5de
0cb1787
d3fe0b4
64956d8
cd5941c
35074f7
9dd52d4
2f7abf7
d99d005
342710b
e93c70b
3245b62
456da51
473e0de
2ca656e
e3c5dc5
86e2fa8
1a8357f
9973b59
c559e5f
8201454
83f7fde
6fa4177
97d31af
a7ea81d
abe6056
72876a8
e7120d5
91d5e81
db0a304
a973c8e
0273e4c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it is V1, whaat is filled here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as #48355 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as commented above. It is better to fill a None if it is it is V1.
Did you validate that for V1, the commit log generated can be read by an older version?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Update: Did you mean an old spark version reading a new commit log created (but under V1)? This is not verified in the previous PR and I will verify and will file a separate PR if needed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[UPDATE: I was wrong. Ignore it.] Further clarify: I mean the commit log generated by the new code with V1 should be readable by older code. It is likely to be OK either way (if we doesn't work we need to bump up the version), but I think having a Noneable field is more straight-forward.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Never mind. I was wrong. I missed that you created
class CommitLogLegacy
in your unit test, so we are all good!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@WweiL there must be a misunderstanding here. My previous comment
is two different comments. Even if validation for V1 is done, I still hope None is used for V1, and I've explained it above. See my explanation above https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/48355/files#r1870082653
I didn't see it addressed yet.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@siying I will address this in another PR, depending on if this is merged or yet I might create a separate one:
#49063
Let's scope this PR and ignore this for now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@WweiL I perhaps overlooked it in the previous code review, but this is a format change, so we need to fix it as soon as we can. We can separate this to another PR if it can make the format fix merged sooner.