Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-50507][PYTHON][TESTS][FOLLOW-UP] Add refactored package into pure Python test #49106

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is a followup of #49074 that adds refactored package into pure Python test

Why are the changes needed?

In order to fix the pure Python build https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/12215379954/job/34077255570.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No, test-only.

How was this patch tested?

Will monitor the build.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon changed the title [SPARK-50507][PYTHON][TESTS][FOLLOw-UP] Add refactored package into pure Python test [SPARK-50507][PYTHON][TESTS][FOLLOW-UP] Add refactored package into pure Python test Dec 9, 2024
@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

Merged to master.

@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@
"pyspark.pandas.tests.connect.groupby",
"pyspark.pandas.tests.connect.indexes",
"pyspark.pandas.tests.connect.io",
"pyspark.pandas.tests.connect.pandas",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this be: pyspark.sql.tests.connect.pandas?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes :-). making a pr now

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants