-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(viz-gallery): add 'feature' tag and fuzzy search weighting #18662
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7e33dfc
feat(viz-gallery): add 'feature' tag and fuzzy search weighting
stephenLYZ 8b2f857
add search weight
stephenLYZ 994c400
Update superset-frontend/src/explore/components/controls/VizTypeContr…
stephenLYZ aad71a0
Update superset-frontend/src/explore/components/controls/VizTypeContr…
stephenLYZ 88c6728
Update superset-frontend/src/explore/components/controls/VizTypeContr…
stephenLYZ 698f8cd
Update superset-frontend/src/explore/components/controls/VizTypeContr…
stephenLYZ 306ffb3
some improvements
stephenLYZ cab3d57
take metadata out
stephenLYZ 778b59a
use chartLabel enum to unify
stephenLYZ fb29a0f
Merge branch 'master' into feat-label-search
stephenLYZ b099697
add test chart
stephenLYZ 7c86a41
Merge branch 'master' into feat-label-search
stephenLYZ 18727a8
Merge branch 'feat-label-search' of github.com:stephenLYZ/superset in…
stephenLYZ 25a1cbe
fix cache
stephenLYZ 3f4a56f
Resolving TS Lint issue
rusackas 653667d
Appeasing the linter
rusackas 910bf2c
Removing one example implementation
rusackas cf7cb8c
Removing another example label implementation
rusackas e65142c
Removing the third example label implementation
rusackas File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This
sort
is new. Before we were using the numeric weighting. Does the weighting still work, or does this search "win" in terms of ranking things?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, now we use
CHART_LABEL_ORDER
array to determine the search weight, and the larger theindex
, the larger theweight
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe instead of using this sort based on the label's place in the array order, we can define the labels with some basic (flexible/configurable) weighting, like this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is better (and I think is sufficient for the feature), but I wish there was a way to avoid using
sort
and instead have this be just one more factor in the search result, like the weight for keys thatfuse
supports. This might be a bit heavy-handed in terms of search weighting, but... the feature works!