-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: Removes the deprecated ENABLE_EXPLORE_JSON_CSRF_PROTECTION feature flag #26344
Merged
michael-s-molina
merged 7 commits into
apache:master
from
michael-s-molina:remove-csrf-protection-ff
Jan 18, 2024
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a3b8293
refactor: Removes the ENABLE_EXPLORE_JSON_CSRF_PROTECTION feature flag
michael-s-molina 4199b35
Fixes tests
michael-s-molina a00ac27
Fixes tests 2
michael-s-molina 5ab9a3e
Update UPDATING.md
michael-s-molina 1ed5013
Adds GET
michael-s-molina 423996b
Merge branch 'master' into remove-csrf-protection-ff
michael-s-molina f3a1ccd
Merge branch 'master' into remove-csrf-protection-ff
michael-s-molina File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As this was
False
by default, shouldn't we keep theEXPLORE_JSON_METHODS.append("GET")
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice catch! @dpgaspar can you confirm the expected behavior?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@geido Confirmed and added the
GET
method by default as you suggested.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To my understanding this feature flag would allow
explore_json
to accept HTTP GETs but still imposing CSRF protection. So whenFalse
this endpoint would only accept HTTP POSTs and so would be automatically protected to CSRF. Shouldn't we keep the same behaviour and just allow for POST and be always protected?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feature flag was
False
by default, allowingGET
. There's no other control than excludingGET
when this feature flag isTrue
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
missed the
not
on the feature flag check. Makes sense