-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
0.10.0 (1) - Throw error when passing arguments into getClient
.
#203
Conversation
getClient
.getClient
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another solid, quality of life improvement!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎉
4c1330e
to
407204a
Compare
getClient
.getClient
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💯
Uhh, wtf. deleted the parent branch and now this is closed 🤦 This will need some serious rebasing later... |
Co-authored-by: Jerel Miller <jerelmiller@gmail.com>
0abc532
to
d06e3c2
Compare
size-limit report 📦
|
Job #103: Bundle Size — 1.01MiB (0%).Warning Bundle contains 1 duplicate package – View duplicate packages Bundle metrics
|
Current Job #103 |
Baseline Job #99 |
|
---|---|---|
Initial JS | 890.59KiB |
890.59KiB |
Initial CSS | 0B |
0B |
Cache Invalidation | 0.03% |
0.03% |
Chunks | 24 |
24 |
Assets | 45 |
45 |
Modules | 512 |
512 |
Duplicate Modules | 30 |
30 |
Duplicate Code | 1.29% |
1.29% |
Packages | 29 |
29 |
Duplicate Packages | 1 |
1 |
Bundle size by type no changes
Current Job #103 |
Baseline Job #99 |
|
---|---|---|
JS | 1023.85KiB |
1023.85KiB |
Other | 5.99KiB |
5.99KiB |
View job #103 report View pr/getClient-forceNoParameters branch activity View project dashboard
It has come again and again that people are trying to do this, so we should be more strict about the fact that this is not supported.
Happy for any wording suggestions.