-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add gas fee payer by adding a new payload type #8904
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
31 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5bcb383
first update
gerben-stavenga 8993f16
Use RawTransactionWithData
gerben-stavenga 564c64f
fix all locations
gerben-stavenga 153c0b3
introduce the gas fee authenticator
davidiw 8035f1c
[fee-payer] plumb through the VM and framework
davidiw 529dfc1
move tests pass
davidiw 341a74c
fix prover
gerben-stavenga 04f3578
fix order
gerben-stavenga ae18471
Merge branch 'main' into gerben-fee-payer
gerben-stavenga 0f535ea
regen
gerben-stavenga 884b378
Add
gerben-stavenga e2dfc10
restore sdk/src/types.rs
gerben-stavenga 3ec2125
remove old comment
gerben-stavenga 7512ad2
split test/remove println
gerben-stavenga b7ad826
remove unnecessary payload
davidiw a08294b
Redo protos
gerben-stavenga 7512d0d
remove more
gerben-stavenga 531c014
undo changes
gerben-stavenga 2c2124e
Merge branch 'main' into gerben-fee-payer
gerben-stavenga 90d0465
Merge branch 'main' into gerben-fee-payer
gregnazario fc8bf30
Add spec
gerben-stavenga fcfdcfe
add test
gerben-stavenga ba958a0
rest api
gerben-stavenga 3b7dcbf
api test
gerben-stavenga 48e890d
regen
gerben-stavenga 9d41347
regen
gerben-stavenga 72e7a93
lint
gerben-stavenga 16b19c3
reinsert seq too big test
gerben-stavenga c789507
regen
gerben-stavenga 0a8302a
regen
gerben-stavenga b1f8bb8
prover improvement
gerben-stavenga File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need to verify that this signature matches the fee payer address here? Should at least be done in the execution flow somewhere
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's done in the prologue
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Found this in Move in fee_payer_script_prologue. I wonder if we should have a separate error here because it'd be hard to know which signature mismatches with the address - senders' or payer's. Users would see the same error for both cases and be confused