fix(experiment): Allow service creation with configurable ports. Fixes #2233

[jeromeguiard]

Checklist:

• Either (a) I've created an enhancement proposal and discussed it with the community, (b) this is a bug fix, or (c) this is a chore.
• The title of the PR is (a) conventional, (b) states what changed, and (c) suffixes the related issues number. E.g. "fix(controller): Updates such and such. Fixes #1234".
• I've signed my commits with DCO
• I have written unit and/or e2e tests for my change. PRs without these are unlikely to be merged.
• My builds are green. Try syncing with master if they are not.
• My organization is added to USERS.md.

[github-actions]

Go Published Test Results

1 653 tests   1 652 ✔️  2m 20s ⏱️
   101 suites         0 💤
       1 files           1 ❌

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 85e6333.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
1 Code Smell

No Coverage information
6.9% Duplication

[github-actions]

E2E Tests Published Test Results

    1 files    1 suites   2h 9m 35s ⏱️
  89 tests 72 ✔️ 3 💤 14 ❌
171 runs  74 ✔️ 3 💤 94 ❌

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 85e6333.

[alexef]

see also #2357 where I'm allowing the entire ServiceSpec to be configured, not only the ports.

[zachaller]

Closed by #2397