You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There have been a couplerequests for making stdout available as an output for non-script steps.
Wrapping the container to pipe stdout to a file or refactoring to use a script step both feel hacky.
Motivation
When I don't have control of or don't want to modify an image to access stdout as an output.
The hacks/workarounds are simple enough. But adding this feature would reduce some (apparently common) onboarding friction, since people seem to expect stdout to be available on outputs.result.
Proposal
I think outputs.result should contain the stdout.
Message from the maintainers:
If you wish to see this enhancement implemented please add a 👍 reaction to this issue! We often sort issues this way to know what to prioritize.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Summary
There have been a couple requests for making stdout available as an output for non-script steps.
Wrapping the container to pipe stdout to a file or refactoring to use a script step both feel hacky.
Motivation
When I don't have control of or don't want to modify an image to access stdout as an output.
The hacks/workarounds are simple enough. But adding this feature would reduce some (apparently common) onboarding friction, since people seem to expect stdout to be available on
outputs.result
.Proposal
I think
outputs.result
should contain the stdout.Message from the maintainers:
If you wish to see this enhancement implemented please add a 👍 reaction to this issue! We often sort issues this way to know what to prioritize.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: