-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
element.webkitMatchesSelector in phantomjs does not report ":focus" accurately #10427
Comments
ste...@brandwatch.com commented:
|
cur...@ram9.cc commented:
|
philfreo@gmail.com commented:
|
philfreo@gmail.com commented:
|
+1 |
4 similar comments
+1 |
+1 |
+1 |
👍 |
Since this bug specifically mentions jQuery, I'll note that jQuery added a workaround for this WebKit bug in jQuery core 1.8.2: http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/12492 |
Though this has been fixed in jQuery, I'm using Poltergeist (a PhantomJS driver for Capybara, which is a browser testing driver for Ruby) for a lot of integration testing. I'd like to be able to test whether an element has focus and it seems like the natural way to do that would be to use the I'd also guess the cause of this is the same as #11432. |
+1 |
3 similar comments
+1 |
+1 |
+1 |
+1 |
+1 |
1 similar comment
+1 |
Please fix it! |
+1 |
+1 |
1 similar comment
+1 |
Any progress on fixing this bug? |
+1 Would be nice to test accessibly features but no can do without a :focus element or document.activeElement |
+1 |
1 similar comment
+1 |
+1 |
3 similar comments
+1 |
+1 |
+1 |
Another possible patch (rude)
|
+1 |
@garex I tried something like that at one point without much luck -- I don't think the |
+1 |
I experimented with this a bit using a 2.1 branch (master crashes for me). First I tried to fix it in PhantomJS itself, but calling Next I looked into WebKit sources, the P.S. I suggest owner of this repo to remove all junk +1 comments and block their authors. |
Can someone check it with recently released 2.5 beta version? Thanks! |
+1 |
@vitallium Where can I download a version of 2.5 that will work with Selenium/Nightwatch.js? What I downloaded from https://bitbucket.org/ariya/phantomjs/downloads/ wasn't recognized by Selenium. |
+1 |
+1 |
…d causing an infinite loop Addresses ariya/phantomjs#10427
+1 |
…d causing an infinite loop Addresses ariya/phantomjs#10427
Due to our very limited maintenance capacity (see #14541 for more details), we need to prioritize our development focus on other tasks. Therefore, this issue will be automatically closed. In the future, if we see the need to attend to this issue again, then it will be reopened. Thank you for your contribution! |
ryangree...@gmail.com commented:
Disclaimer:
This issue was migrated on 2013-03-15 from the project's former issue tracker on Google Code, Issue #427.
🌟 16 people had starred this issue at the time of migration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: